Literature DB >> 34524823

Reversible Click Chemistry Tag for Universal Proteome Sample Preparation for Top-Down and Bottom-Up Analysis.

Stephanie Biedka1, Brigitte F Schmidt2,3, Nolan M Frey3, Sarah M Boothman3, Jonathan S Minden1,3, Amber Lee Wilson1.   

Abstract

Successful proteome analysis requires reliable sample preparation beginning with protein solubilization and ending with a sample free of contaminants, ready for downstream analysis. Most proteome sample preparation technologies utilize precipitation or filter-based separation, both of which have significant disadvantages. None of the current technologies are able to prepare both intact proteins or digested peptides. Here, we introduce a reversible protein tag, ProMTag, that enables whole proteome capture, cleanup, and release of intact proteins for top-down analysis. Alternatively, the addition of a novel Trypsin derivative to the workflow generates peptides for bottom-up analysis. We show that the ProMTag workflow yields >90% for intact proteins and >85% for proteome digests. For top-down analysis, ProMTag cleanup improves resolution on 2D gels; for bottom-up exploration, this methodology produced reproducible mass spectrometry results, demonstrating that the ProMTag method is a truly universal approach that produces high-quality proteome samples compatible with multiple downstream analytical techniques. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027799.

Entities:  

Keywords:  click chemistry; protein; protein chemistry; protein mass spectrometry; protein modification; proteomics; reversible chemistry; sample cleanup; sample preparation; two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34524823      PMCID: PMC9392872          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   5.370


  41 in total

1.  In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice.

Authors:  Raffaella Rossin; Pascal Renart Verkerk; Sandra M van den Bosch; Roland C M Vulders; Iris Verel; Johan Lub; Marc S Robillard
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin filters.

Authors:  Linda L Manza; Sheryl L Stamer; Amy-Joan L Ham; Simona G Codreanu; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  In-gel equilibration for improved protein retention in 2DE-based proteomic workflows.

Authors:  Phu T Van; Vinitha Ganesan; Victor Bass; Amritha Parthasarathy; Danielle Schlesinger; Jonathan S Minden
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Micro-NMR for rapid molecular analysis of human tumor samples.

Authors:  Jered B Haun; Cesar M Castro; Rui Wang; Vanessa M Peterson; Brett S Marinelli; Hakho Lee; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Quantitative assay of the binding of small molecules to protein: comparison of dialysis and membrane filter assays.

Authors:  J E Lever
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range.

Authors:  Malte Sielaff; Jörg Kuharev; Toszka Bohn; Jennifer Hahlbrock; Tobias Bopp; Stefan Tenzer; Ute Distler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Bioorthogonal turn-on probes for imaging small molecules inside living cells.

Authors:  Neal K Devaraj; Scott Hilderbrand; Rabi Upadhyay; Ralph Mazitschek; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Fast and sensitive pretargeted labeling of cancer cells through a tetrazine/trans-cyclooctene cycloaddition.

Authors:  Neal K Devaraj; Rabi Upadhyay; Jered B Haun; Scott A Hilderbrand; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.

Authors:  Katelyn R Ludwig; Monica M Schroll; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.370

10.  Protease-resistant streptavidin for interaction proteomics.

Authors:  Mahmoud-Reza Rafiee; Gianluca Sigismondo; Mathias Kalxdorf; Laura Förster; Britta Brügger; Julien Béthune; Jeroen Krijgsveld
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mass spectrometry-based draft of the mouse proteome.

Authors:  Piero Giansanti; Patroklos Samaras; Yangyang Bian; Chen Meng; Andrea Coluccio; Martin Frejno; Hannah Jakubowsky; Sophie Dobiasch; Rashmi R Hazarika; Julia Rechenberger; Julia Calzada-Wack; Johannes Krumm; Sebastian Mueller; Chien-Yun Lee; Nicole Wimberger; Ludwig Lautenbacher; Zonera Hassan; Yun-Chien Chang; Chiara Falcomatà; Florian P Bayer; Stefanie Bärthel; Tobias Schmidt; Roland Rad; Stephanie E Combs; Matthew The; Frank Johannes; Dieter Saur; Martin Hrabe de Angelis; Mathias Wilhelm; Günter Schneider; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 47.990

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.