Literature DB >> 34523110

Pharmacokinetically guided, once-daily intravenous busulfan in combination with fludarabine for elderly AML/MDS patients as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Chikako Ohwada1,2,3, Shingo Yamazaki4, Katsuhiro Shono5, Kensuke Kayamori6,7, Yutaro Hino6,7, Nagisa Oshima-Hasegawa6,7, Tomoya Muto6,7, Shokichi Tsukamoto6,7, Shio Mitsukawa6,7,8, Yusuke Takeda6,7, Naoya Mimura6,7,8, Masahiro Takeuchi9, Tohru Iseki6,7,8, Masahiro Onoda5, Akira Yokota5, Takaaki Suzuki4, Itsuko Ishii4, Chiaki Nakaseko6,10, Emiko Sakaida6,7.   

Abstract

The efficacy of pharmacokinetically (PK) guided, once-daily administration of busulfan (BU) was evaluated in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Twenty-one patients (median age 61) received 30 mg/m2 fludarabine for 6 days and BU for 4 days, starting from 3.2 mg/m2 and subsequently adjusted to the target area under the curve (AUC) of 6000 µmol-min/L. The median AUC of day 1 (AUC1), AUC4, and their average were 4871.3, 6021.0, and 5368.1 µmol-min/L, respectively. Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) occurred in five patients (24%) but all recovered well. Four patients (20%) had non-infectious pulmonary complications (NIPCs). Patients with high AUC1 had frequent gastrointestinal adverse events, but similar incidence of VOD/SOS and NIPCs. Two-year overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse rates were 44.4%, 28.6%, and 29.1%, respectively. Patients with high AUC1 had significantly high NRM (57.1% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.04) and inferior OS (14.3% vs. 60.1%, P = 0.002), while patients with high AUC4 had a significantly low relapse rate (8.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, once-daily BU and a PK-guided dose intensification were beneficial for reducing relapse in elderly patients with AML/MDS. However, caution should be exercised as rapid BU dose elevation may contribute to NRM.
© 2021. Japanese Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area under the curve; Busulfan; Conditioning; Pharmacokinetics; Transplant-related toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34523110     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-021-03188-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  2 in total

1.  Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Francine Attié de Castro; Vera Lucia Lanchote; Julio Cesar Voltarelli; Virgílio Antônio Rensi Colturato; Belinda Pinto Simões
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Pharmacologically-guided dose adjustment of busulfan in high-dose chemotherapy regimens: rationale and pitfalls (review).

Authors:  G Vassal
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact of busulfan pharmacokinetics on outcome in adult patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Claire Seydoux; Raphael Battegay; Joerg Halter; Dominik Heim; Katharina M Rentsch; Jakob R Passweg; Michael Medinger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.174

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.