Literature DB >> 7825973

Pharmacologically-guided dose adjustment of busulfan in high-dose chemotherapy regimens: rationale and pitfalls (review).

G Vassal1.   

Abstract

High-dose busulfan is used in conditioning regimens before allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in adults and children. During the last six years, several studies have established the wide inter- and intrapatient variability of high-dose busulfan disposition. Clearance rate ranges from 0.8 to 20 ml/min/kg. Some factors of variability have been identified: age, alteration in hepatic functions, disease, circadian rhythmicity, drug interactions. Using a fixed dose of busulfan, wide interpatient variability in systemic exposure is thus expected, with eventual consequences on toxicity and efficacy. In adults, a pharmacodynamic relationship between a high busulfan systemic exposure and the occurrence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) has been established. A prospective controlled study demonstrated that busulfan dose-adjustment decreased the morbidity and mortality of HVOD in adults. So far, pharmacodynamic studies in children have failed to establish a toxic level. The present paper analyses the rationale for busulfan dose adjustment, and focuses on the eventual pitfalls that may jeopardize its reliability (drug absorption, chronopharmacology, drug interaction within the conditioning regimen, complex pathophysiology of HVOD). Further pharmacodynamic studies are required to establish a minimum therapeutic threshold in systemic exposure for bone marrow engraftment, especially in children undergoing HLA-compatible or incompatible allogeneic BMT for non malignant disease. The definition of a therapeutic window according to the disease and the type of BMT, along with the development of iv-busulfan, will allow accurate and effective pharmacologically-guided dose adjustment of high-dose busulfan. By the end of the century, busulfan plasma level monitoring and dose adjustment at the individual level may improve the outcome of patients undergoing BMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7825973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

1.  Intravenous busulfan: in the conditioning treatment of pediatric patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Comparison of algorithms for oral busulphan area under the concentration-time curve limited sampling estimate.

Authors:  Fredrik Sjöö; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Jon Enestig; Jonas Mattsson; Johan Liwing; Moustapha Hassan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Busulfan dosing algorithm and sampling strategy in stem cell transplantation patients.

Authors:  Francine A de Castro; Chiara Piana; Belinda P Simões; Vera L Lanchote; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  The role of busulfan in bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  M Hassan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Once daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine (i.v. Bu-Flu) compares favorably with i.v. busulfan and cyclophosphamide (i.v. BuCy2) as pretransplant conditioning therapy in AML/MDS.

Authors:  Borje S Andersson; Marcos de Lima; Peter F Thall; Xuemei Wang; Daniel Couriel; Martin Korbling; Soonja Roberson; Sergio Giralt; Betty Pierre; James A Russell; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roy B Jones; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Oral chemotherapy agents in the treatment of leukaemia.

Authors:  R B Geller; S P Dix
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Better leukemia-free and overall survival in AML in first remission following cyclophosphamide in combination with busulfan compared with TBI.

Authors:  Edward A Copelan; Betty K Hamilton; Belinda Avalos; Kwang Woo Ahn; Brian J Bolwell; Xiaochun Zhu; Mahmoud Aljurf; Koen van Besien; Christopher Bredeson; Jean-Yves Cahn; Luciano J Costa; Marcos de Lima; Robert Peter Gale; Gregory A Hale; Joerg Halter; Mehdi Hamadani; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Rammurti T Kamble; Mark R Litzow; Alison W Loren; David I Marks; Eduardo Olavarria; Vivek Roy; Mitchell Sabloff; Bipin N Savani; Matthew Seftel; Harry C Schouten; Celalettin Ustun; Edmund K Waller; Daniel J Weisdorf; Baldeep Wirk; Mary M Horowitz; Mukta Arora; Jeff Szer; Jorge Cortes; Matt E Kalaycio; Richard T Maziarz; Wael Saber
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Pharmacokinetically guided, once-daily intravenous busulfan in combination with fludarabine for elderly AML/MDS patients as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Chikako Ohwada; Shingo Yamazaki; Katsuhiro Shono; Kensuke Kayamori; Yutaro Hino; Nagisa Oshima-Hasegawa; Tomoya Muto; Shokichi Tsukamoto; Shio Mitsukawa; Yusuke Takeda; Naoya Mimura; Masahiro Takeuchi; Tohru Iseki; Masahiro Onoda; Akira Yokota; Takaaki Suzuki; Itsuko Ishii; Chiaki Nakaseko; Emiko Sakaida
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Assessing the Efficacy of Alkylating Agent Regimens in the Treatment of Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis: Cyclophosphamide, Busulfan, or Thiotepa.

Authors:  Himanshu Wagh; Amber Arif; Akshay J Reddy; Ethan Tabaie; Aditya Shekhar; Mildred Min; Neel Nawathey; Mark Bachir; Hetal Brahmbhatt
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-06

10.  Evaluation of a Nanoparticle-Based Busulfan Immunoassay for Rapid Analysis on Routine Clinical Analyzers.

Authors:  Mary Rose Hilaire; Regina V Gill; Jodi B Courtney; Irina Baburina; JoAnn Gardiner; Michael C Milone; Leslie M Shaw; Qing H Meng; Salvatore J Salamone
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.681

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.