Literature DB >> 30714890

Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.

Falk Lieder1, Thomas L Griffiths2.   

Abstract

Modeling human cognition is challenging because there are infinitely many mechanisms that can generate any given observation. Some researchers address this by constraining the hypothesis space through assumptions about what the human mind can and cannot do, while others constrain it through principles of rationality and adaptation. Recent work in economics, psychology, neuroscience, and linguistics has begun to integrate both approaches by augmenting rational models with cognitive constraints, incorporating rational principles into cognitive architectures, and applying optimality principles to understanding neural representations. We identify the rational use of limited resources as a unifying principle underlying these diverse approaches, expressing it in a new cognitive modeling paradigm called resource-rational analysis. The integration of rational principles with realistic cognitive constraints makes resource-rational analysis a promising framework for reverse-engineering cognitive mechanisms and representations. It has already shed new light on the debate about human rationality and can be leveraged to revisit classic questions of cognitive psychology within a principled computational framework. We demonstrate that resource-rational models can reconcile the mind's most impressive cognitive skills with people's ostensive irrationality. Resource-rational analysis also provides a new way to connect psychological theory more deeply with artificial intelligence, economics, neuroscience, and linguistics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bounded rationality; cognitive biases; cognitive mechanisms; cognitive modeling; representations; resource rationality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30714890     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  39 in total

1.  Computational evidence for hierarchically structured reinforcement learning in humans.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Young children combine sensory cues with learned information in a statistically efficient manner: But task complexity matters.

Authors:  Vikranth R Bejjanki; Emily R Randrup; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-10-31

3.  REFRESH: A new approach to modeling dimensional biases in perceptual similarity and categorization.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Katherine Heller; Joseph L Austerweil; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Gated recurrence enables simple and accurate sequence prediction in stochastic, changing, and structured environments.

Authors:  Cédric Foucault; Florent Meyniel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Humans adaptively resolve the explore-exploit dilemma under cognitive constraints: Evidence from a multi-armed bandit task.

Authors:  Vanessa M Brown; Michael N Hallquist; Michael J Frank; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-07-30

6.  Continuous decisions.

Authors:  Seng Bum Michael Yoo; Benjamin Yost Hayden; John M Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Cognitive Control as a Multivariate Optimization Problem.

Authors:  Harrison Ritz; Xiamin Leng; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Toward a formal theory of proactivity.

Authors:  F Lieder; G Iwama
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 10.  The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure.

Authors:  Jordan E Theriault; Liane Young; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.