| Literature DB >> 34513553 |
S Suganyadevi1, V Seethalakshmi1, K Balasamy2.
Abstract
Ongoing improvements in AI, particularly concerning deep learning techniques, are assisting to identify, classify, and quantify patterns in clinical images. Deep learning is the quickest developing field in artificial intelligence and is effectively utilized lately in numerous areas, including medication. A brief outline is given on studies carried out on the region of application: neuro, brain, retinal, pneumonic, computerized pathology, bosom, heart, breast, bone, stomach, and musculoskeletal. For information exploration, knowledge deployment, and knowledge-based prediction, deep learning networks can be successfully applied to big data. In the field of medical image processing methods and analysis, fundamental information and state-of-the-art approaches with deep learning are presented in this paper. The primary goals of this paper are to present research on medical image processing as well as to define and implement the key guidelines that are identified and addressed.Entities:
Keywords: Accuracy; Deep learning; Image classes; Medical image analysis; Survey
Year: 2021 PMID: 34513553 PMCID: PMC8417661 DOI: 10.1007/s13735-021-00218-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Multimed Inf Retr
Fig. 1Types of learning
Fig. 2General architecture of neural network and deep learning
Deep learning architecture with suitable application
| Architecture | Application |
|---|---|
| DNN | Visual art processing |
| CNN | Natural language processing, image recognition, and video analysis |
| RNN | Speech recognition, handwriting recognition |
| DC-ELM | Image classification, handwriting recognition |
| DBM | Image recognition, video recognition, motion-capture data |
| DBN | Failure prediction, image recognition, natural language understanding, and information retrieval |
| DAN | Image generation, dimensionality reduction, recommendation system, image denoising, sequence to sequence prediction, image compression, feature extraction |
| DSN | Information retrieval, continuous speech recognition |
| LSTM/GRU | Gesture recognition, handwriting recognition, image captioning, speech recognition, and text/image translation |
Fig. 3Medical image analysis
Fig. 4Taxonomy of literature review
Fig. 5Classification algorithms
Fig. 6Evolution in deep learning techniques
Summary of previous research works associated with COVID-19 classification and detection
| Literature | Method used | Training model | Dataset | Image classes | Performance measure (accuracy) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apostopoulos and Bessiana (2020) | Deep Transfer Learning | VGG 19, Mobile Net | Totally 1427 images of data including 224 Covid-19 +ve images, 700 data images of bacterial-infected pneumonia, and 504 data images of normal healthy people | +ve case of Covid-19, pneumonia cases, normal cases | 96.95 |
| Ozturk (2020) | Deep Learning | DarkCovidNet | 1125 data images (125 +ve Covid-19, 500 Pneumonia-infected cases and 500 no findings i.e., normal cases) | Covid+, pneumonia, no findings | 86.85 |
| Chaimae ouchicha (2020) | Deep Learning | CVDNet | 219 cases of Covid-19 infected, 1341 cases of normal infection, and 1345 cases of viral pneumonia | Covid-19 +ve cases, pneumonia-infected cases, normal people | 96.20 |
| Sethy (2020) | Deep Learning | ResNet50 + SVM | 127 COVID-19 images, 127 pneumonia images, and 127 stable images were verified | +ve cases versus –ve cases | 95.46 |
| Yoo (2020) | Deep Learning | ResNet 18 | 162 images of Covid-19 cases, 326 TB, and 226 normal cases | Tuberculosis versus Covid-19 | 94.95 |
| Panwar (2020) | Deep Learning | nCOVnet withVGG16 | 192 images of Covid-19, 5863 images of normal images, bacterial images, pneumonia images, and viral pneumonia images | Covid-19 versus others | 88 |
| Albahli(2020) | Deep Learning | ResNet152 | 108,948 X-ray images (frontal-view) of 32,717 patients | Covid-19 versus other chest diseases | 87 |
| Mesut Togacar (2020) | Deep Learning | MobileNetV2, SqueezeNet + SVM | Dataset collected from GitHub and Kaggle comprising 76 cases with COVID-19 and 53 cases with virus and bacterial pneumonia and 166 normal cases | Covid-19, pneumonia, normal | 94 |
| Shervin minaee (2020) | Deep Transfer Learning | ResNet18,ResNet50,SqueezeNet,DenseNet-121 | 200 Covid-19-infected cases and 5000 non-Covid cases | Covid-19, normal | 92.5 |
| Govardhan Jain | Deep Learning | ResNet50, ResNet-101,DenceNet121,VGG-16 | CheXpert is an open access repository that includes 224,316 frontal view chest X-ray photos of 14 disease groups obtained from 65,240 specific subjects | Pneumonia due to Covid-19 virus versus bacterial pneumonia and normal healthy people | 97.77 |
| Harsh Panwar | Deep Learning | VGG 19 + Grad CAM | 206 cases with Covid-19 and 364 normal healthy cases | Covid-19 versus non-Covid-19 | 95.61 |
| Civit-Masot (2020) | Deep Learning | VGG16 | 132 Covid 19 cases, 132 healthy cases, 132 pneumonia | Covid-19 +versus Other | 85.67 |
| Wang (2020 | Deep Learning | DeCovNet | 51 confirmed Covid-19, pneumonia, and 55 control patients | Covid-19, pneumonia, normal | 90.1 |
| Singh (2020) | Deep Learning | MODE-based CNN | Confirmed, death and recovered cases of COVID-19 | Covid-19 versus NO Covid-19 versus normal healthy people | 93.29 |
| Ahuja (2020) | Deep Learning | ResNet 18 | 349 CT COVID19 +ve CT images in 216 infected patients and 397 CT images from non-COVID patients | Normal and Covid-19 versus Non- Covid-19 | 99.4 |
Fig. 7Deep learning algorithms with accuracy