Literature DB >> 34507932

The public's attitude towards doctors' use of Twitter and perceived professionalism: an exploratory study.

Yakup Kilic1, Devkishan Chauhan1, Pearl Avery2, Nigel Horwood3, Radislav Nakov4, Ben Disney5, Jonathan P Segal1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical professionals use social media to interact with other healthcare professionals, discuss medical issues and promote healthcare information. These platforms have tremendous power to promote healthcare messages but also have potential to damage the profession if used inappropriately. It is currently unknown how others perceive medical doctors' Twitter activity and, therefore, we conducted an online survey exploring these views.
METHODS: We used a Google Forms questionnaire consisting of 21 questions, which we distributed on Twitter, exploring doctors', patients', the public's and other healthcare professionals' views of doctors' Twitter activities. We investigated factors that were associated with mistrust by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Seven-hundred and twenty-six respondents completed the survey. By univariate analysis, a higher proportion of non-doctors reported witnessing unprofessional behaviour and potential breaches of patient confidentiality compared with doctors (p<0.01). In addition, a significantly higher proportion of non-doctors felt that doctors' Twitter accounts should be monitored by both their employer and regulator when compared with doctors. By multivariate analysis, the main predictor of mistrust in the profession were those that had previously witnessed unprofessional behaviour (odds ratio 2.70; 95% confidence interval 2.08-3.33; p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies in how doctors and non-doctors view Twitter activity and significant mistrust in the profession was brought about by doctors' Twitter activity. To help limit this, adherence to current guidelines set out by the General Medical Council and British Medical Association is vital and doctors should be cautious about how their Twitter activity is professionally perceived by others before posting. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confidentiality; healthcare professionals; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34507932      PMCID: PMC8439510          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   5.410


  10 in total

1.  What social media offers to health professionals and citizens.

Authors:  Christine McNab
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Legal and ethical issues regarding social media and pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Joseph L Fink
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Over 1200 NHS staff have been disciplined for social media use.

Authors:  Abi Rimmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 4.  Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology.

Authors:  Olena Zimba; Olena Radchenko; Larysa Strilchuk
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine.

Authors:  Daniel R George; Liza S Rovniak; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  The evolving role of social media in health-care delivery: measuring the perception of health-care professionals in Eastern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Fatimah Alshakhs; Turki Alanzi
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 7.  Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare.

Authors:  Yash Pershad; Patrick T Hangge; Hassan Albadawi; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Medical images, social media and consent.

Authors:  Jonathan P Segal; Richard Hansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication.

Authors:  Wen-ying Sylvia Chou; Yvonne M Hunt; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Medical information and social media in the time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Siobhain Mulrennan; Henri Colt
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.424

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology Professionals.

Authors:  Anusha Chidharla; Audun Utengen; Deanna J Attai; Emily K Drake; G J van Londen; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Elizabeth Henry; Martina Murphy; Maura M Barry; Rami Manochakian; Scott Moerdler; Stacy Loeb; Stephanie L Graff; Yan Leyfman; Michael A Thompson; Merry J Markham
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-21

2.  Twitter Usage Among Physicians From 2016 to 2020: Algorithm Development and Longitudinal Analysis Study.

Authors:  Keisuke Nakagawa; Nuen Tsang Yang; Machelle Wilson; Peter Yellowlees
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 7.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.