Literature DB >> 34504625

Development and Application of a United States wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor.

Karoline K Barkjohn1, Brett Gantt2, Andrea L Clements1.   

Abstract

PurpleAir sensors, which measure particulate matter (PM), are widely used by individuals, community groups, and other organizations including state and local air monitoring agencies. PurpleAir sensors comprise a massive global network of more than 10,000 sensors. Previous performance evaluations have typically studied a limited number of PurpleAir sensors in small geographic areas or laboratory environments. While useful for determining sensor behavior and data normalization for these geographic areas, little work has been done to understand the broad applicability of these results outside these regions and conditions. Here, PurpleAir sensors operated by air quality monitoring agencies are evaluated in comparison to collocated ambient air quality regulatory instruments. In total, almost 12,000 24-hour averaged PM2.5 measurements from collocated PurpleAir sensors and Federal Reference Method (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) PM2.5 measurements were collected across diverse regions of the United States (U.S.), including 16 states. Consistent with previous evaluations, under typical ambient and smoke impacted conditions, the raw data from PurpleAir sensors overestimate PM2.5 concentrations by about 40% in most parts of the U.S. A simple linear regression reduces much of this bias across most U.S. regions, but adding a relative humidity term further reduces the bias and improves consistency in the biases between different regions. More complex multiplicative models did not substantially improve results when tested on an independent dataset. The final PurpleAir correction reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) of the raw data from 8 μg m-3 to 3 μg m-3 with an average FRM or FEM concentration of 9 μg m-3. This correction equation, along with proposed data cleaning criteria, has been applied to PurpleAir PM2.5 measurements across the U.S. in the AirNow Fire and Smoke Map (fire.airnow.gov) and has the potential to be successfully used in other air quality and public health applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34504625      PMCID: PMC8422884          DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech        ISSN: 1867-1381            Impact factor:   4.184


  44 in total

1.  Estimating hourly PM2.5 concentrations at the neighborhood scale using a low-cost air sensor network: A Los Angeles case study.

Authors:  Yougeng Lu; Genevieve Giuliano; Rima Habre
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  A review on the direct effect of particulate atmospheric pollution on materials and its mitigation for sustainable cities and societies.

Authors:  Hanadi Al-Thani; Muammer Koç; Rima J Isaifan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Fulizi Xiong; Drew Gentner; Branko Kerkez; Joseph Kohrman-Glaser; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors.

Authors:  Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Michael Brauer; N Christina Hsu; Ralph A Kahn; Robert C Levy; Alexei Lyapustin; Andrew M Sayer; David M Winker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Examining the functional range of commercially available low-cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences.

Authors:  Yangyang Zou; Matthew Young; Jiawei Chen; Jiaqi Liu; Andrew May; Jordan D Clark
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

Authors:  Marina Zusman; Cooper S Schumacher; Amanda J Gassett; Elizabeth W Spalt; Elena Austin; Timothy V Larson; Graeme Carvlin; Edmund Seto; Joel D Kaufman; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Deliberating Performance Targets: Follow-on workshop discussing PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2 air sensor targets.

Authors:  R M Duvall; G S W Hagler; A L Clements; K Benedict; K Barkjohn; V Kilaru; T Hanley; N Watkins; A Kaufman; A Kamal; S Reece; P Fransioli; M Gerboles; G Gillerman; R Habre; M Hannigan; Z Ning; V Papapostolou; R Pope; P J E Quintana; J Lam Snyder
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Connecting Air Quality with Emotional Well-Being and Neighborhood Infrastructure in a US City.

Authors:  Raj M Lal; Kirti Das; Yingling Fan; Karoline K Barkjohn; Nisha Botchwey; Anu Ramaswami; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2020-05-03

9.  Future Fire Impacts on Smoke Concentrations, Visibility, and Health in the Contiguous United States.

Authors:  B Ford; M Val Martin; S E Zelasky; E V Fischer; S C Anenberg; C L Heald; J R Pierce
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  Establishing a Community Air Monitoring Network in a Wildfire Smoke-Prone Rural Community: The Motivations, Experiences, Challenges, and Ideas of Clean Air Methow's Clean Air Ambassadors.

Authors:  Amanda Durkin; Rico Gonzalez; Tania Busch Isaksen; Elizabeth Walker; Nicole A Errett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  10 in total

1.  Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California.

Authors:  Yutong Liang; Deep Sengupta; Mark J Campmier; David M Lunderberg; Joshua S Apte; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Hao Lei; Abhirup Datta; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  Calibration of PurpleAir PA-I and PA-II Monitors Using Daily Mean PM2.5 Concentrations Measured in California, Washington, and Oregon from 2017 to 2021.

Authors:  Lance Wallace; Tongke Zhao; Neil E Klepeis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Short-Term Exposure to Wildfire Smoke and PM2.5 and Cognitive Performance in a Brain-Training Game: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Adults.

Authors:  Stephanie E Cleland; Lauren H Wyatt; Linda Wei; Naman Paul; Marc L Serre; J Jason West; Sarah B Henderson; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 11.035

5.  Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Nancy Carmona; Magali N Blanco; Amanda J Gassett; Edmund Seto; Adam A Szpiro; Timothy V Larson; Paul D Sampson; Joel D Kaufman; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Indoor-Generated PM2.5 During COVID-19 Shutdowns Across California: Application of the PurpleAir Indoor-Outdoor Low-Cost Sensor Network.

Authors:  Amirhosein Mousavi; Jun Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  Towards the Development of a Sensor Educational Toolkit to Support Community and Citizen Science.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Vasileios Papapostolou; Brandon Feenstra; Berj Der Boghossian; Andrea Polidori
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Leveraging Citizen Science and Low-Cost Sensors to Characterize Air Pollution Exposure of Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California.

Authors:  Tianjun Lu; Yisi Liu; Armando Garcia; Meng Wang; Yang Li; German Bravo-Villasenor; Kimberly Campos; Jia Xu; Bin Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Indoor Air Quality Considerations for Laboratory Animals in Wildfire-Impacted Regions-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Adam Schuller; Ethan S Walker; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Matthew Lundgren; Luke Montrose
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 10.  Digital Healthcare for Airway Diseases from Personal Environmental Exposure.

Authors:  Youngmok Park; Chanho Lee; Ji Ye Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.