Literature DB >> 31709614

Examining the functional range of commercially available low-cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences.

Yangyang Zou1, Matthew Young2, Jiawei Chen1, Jiaqi Liu1, Andrew May1,2, Jordan D Clark1,2.   

Abstract

Low-cost airborne particle sensors are gaining attention for monitoring human exposure to indoor particulate matter. This study aimed to establish the concentrations at which these commercially available sensors can be expected to report accurate concentrations. We exposed five types of commercial integrated devices and three types of "bare" low-cost particle sensors to a range of concentrations generated by three different sources. We propose definitions of upper and lower bounds of functional range based on the relationship between a given sensor's output and that of a reference instrument during a laboratory experiment. Experiments show that the lower bound can range from approximately 3 to 15 μg/m3 . At greater concentrations, sensor output deviates from linearity at approximately 300-3000 μg/m3 . We also conducted a simulation campaign to analyze the effect of this limitation on functional range on the accuracy of exposure readings given by these devices. We estimate that the upper bound results in minimal inaccuracy in exposure quantification, and the lower bound can result in as much as a 50% error in approximately 10% of US homes.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indoor Air Quality; air quality sensors; building simulation; exposure monitoring; low-cost sensors; smart buildings

Year:  2019        PMID: 31709614     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  4 in total

1.  Development and Application of a United States wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor.

Authors:  Karoline K Barkjohn; Brett Gantt; Andrea L Clements
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.184

Review 2.  Towards Personalization of Indoor Air Quality: Review of Sensing Requirements and Field Deployments.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Hui Ci Goh; Ehsan Mousavi; Hamed Nabizadeh Rafsanjani; Zubin Varghese; Yogesh Pandit; Ali Ghahramani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems.

Authors:  Matthew S Landis; Russell W Long; Jonathan Krug; Maribel Colón; Robert Vanderpool; Andrew Habel; Shawn P Urbanski
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Features and Practicability of the Next-Generation Sensors and Monitors for Exposure Assessment to Airborne Pollutants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giacomo Fanti; Francesca Borghi; Andrea Spinazzè; Sabrina Rovelli; Davide Campagnolo; Marta Keller; Andrea Cattaneo; Emanuele Cauda; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.