Literature DB >> 30660801

Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2: Current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible.

John E Doe1, Alan R Boobis2, Vicki Dellarco3, Penelope A Fenner-Crisp4, Angelo Moretto5, Timothy P Pastoor6, Rita S Schoeny7, Jennifer G Seed8, Douglas C Wolf9.   

Abstract

Developments in the understanding of the etiology of cancer have undermined the 1970s concept that chemicals are either "carcinogens" or "non-carcinogens". The capacity to induce cancer should not be classified in an inflexible binary manner as present (carcinogen) or absent (non-carcinogen). Chemicals may induce cancer by three categories of mode of action: direct interaction with DNA or DNA replication including DNA repair and epigenetics; receptor-mediated induction of cell division; and non-specific induction of cell division. The long-term rodent bioassay is neither appropriate nor efficient to evaluate carcinogenic potential for humans and to inform risk management decisions. It is of questionable predicitiveness, expensive, time consuming, and uses hundreds of animals. Although it has been embedded in practice for over 50 years, it has only been used to evaluate less than 5% of chemicals that are in use. Furthermore, it is not reproducible because of the probabilisitic nature of the process it is evaluating combined with dose limiting toxicity, dose selection, and study design. The modes of action that lead to the induction of tumors are already considered under other hazardous property categories in classification (Mutagenicity/Genotoxicity and Target Organ Toxicity); a separate category for Carcinogenicity is not required and provides no additional public health protection.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinogenicity; Classification; Long term bioassay; Mode of action; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30660801     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  The modification of cancer risk by chemicals.

Authors:  David J Harrison; John E Doe
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.680

3.  A graph neural network approach for molecule carcinogenicity prediction.

Authors:  Philip Fradkin; Adamo Young; Lazar Atanackovic; Brendan Frey; Leo J Lee; Bo Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

4.  A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity.

Authors:  John E Doe; Alan R Boobis; Samuel M Cohen; Vicki L Dellarco; Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Rita S Schoeny; Jennifer G Seed; Douglas C Wolf
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.168

5.  A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.

Authors:  Nicholas Ball; Remi Bars; Philip A Botham; Andreea Cuciureanu; Mark T D Cronin; John E Doe; Tatsiana Dudzina; Timothy W Gant; Marcel Leist; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.