| Literature DB >> 34484579 |
Julia Yu-Fong Chang1,2,3, Feng-Chou Cheng4, Tsui-Hua Liu4, Tzu-Chiang Lin5, Yung-Ta Chang4, Chun-Pin Chiang1,2,3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Dental freshmen; Dental schools; Practicing dentists; Uneven distribution; Urban-rural gap
Year: 2021 PMID: 34484579 PMCID: PMC8403807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Distributions of enrolled dental freshmen by northern, central, and southern dental schools or practicing dentists per 100,000 people in 22 cities and counties of Taiwan in 2020.
| Northern dental schools | Central dental schools | Southern dental schools | Total | Dental student index (%) | Overall practicing dentists | Dentist index (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taipei City | 2.17 | 1.29 | 0.65 | 4.11 | 251.27 | 128.43 | 199.88 |
| New Taipei City | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.62 | 37.94 | 66.39 | 103.32 |
| Taoyuan City | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.80 | 48.74 | 53.97 | 84.00 |
| Taichung City | 0.75 | 1.14 | 0.53 | 2.41 | 147.53 | 70.26 | 109.36 |
| Tainan City | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 2.08 | 126.88 | 60.48 | 94.13 |
| Kaohsiung City | 0.61 | 0.29 | 0.83 | 1.73 | 105.78 | 67.33 | 104.79 |
| Keelung City | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0 | 0.81 | 49.72 | 50.45 | 78.52 |
| Hsinchu City | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.67 | 3.33 | 203.77 | 76.03 | 118.33 |
| Chiayi City | 3.37 | 1.87 | 2.25 | 7.48 | 457.37 | 86.83 | 135.13 |
| Hsinchu County | 0.18 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 21.58 | 44.31 | 68.97 |
| Miaoli County | 0 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 22.45 | 33.62 | 52.32 |
| Changhua County | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.55 | 1.34 | 81.80 | 46.22 | 71.94 |
| Nantou County | 0 | 0.20 | 0 | 0.20 | 12.40 | 33.88 | 52.73 |
| Yunlin County | 0.44 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.59 | 35.97 | 27.23 | 42.38 |
| Chiayi County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.94 | 34.15 |
| Pingtung County | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 0.37 | 22.46 | 25.48 | 39.66 |
| Penghu County | 1.90 | 0 | 0.95 | 2.86 | 174.55 | 34.28 | 53.35 |
| Yilan County | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.10 | 67.30 | 40.53 | 63.08 |
| Hualien County | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 18.78 | 45.78 | 71.25 |
| Taitung County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.55 | 47.55 |
| Kinmen County | 0 | 0.72 | 0 | 0.72 | 43.75 | 13.60 | 21.17 |
| Lienchiang County | 7.67 | 15.34 | 0 | 23.01 | 1406.22 | 30.68 | 47.76 |
| Nationwide (n = 22) | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.44 | 1.64 | 100 | 64.25 | 100 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.63 ± 0.88 | 0.45 ± 0.53 | 0.42 ± 0.52 | 1.50 ± 1.79 | – | 50.36 ± 26.29 | – |
| CV | 1.39 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.19 | – | 0.52 | – |
The item of Lienchiang County was excluded from the statistics of mean, SD and CV.
Mean ± SD = Mean ± Standard deviation; CV = Coefficient of variation.
Comparisons of enrolled dental freshmen or practicing dentists per 100,000 people in different regions of Taiwan in 2020.
| Northern dental schools | Central dental schools | Southern dental schools | Total | Overall practicing dentists | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipalities (n = 6) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.78 ± 0.71 | 0.66 ± 0.48 | 0.52 ± 0.28 | 1.96 ± 1.27 | 74.48 ± 27.06 |
| CV | 0.91 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.36 |
| Non-municipalities (n = 15) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.57 ± 0.95 | 0.37 ± 0.55 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 1.32 ± 1.97 | 29.08 ± 19.42 |
| CV | 1.66 | 1.48 | 1.57 | 1.49 | 0.67 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | 24 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 10∗∗ |
| Cities with dental schools (n = 4) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.03 ± 0.76 | 0.87 ± 0.45 | 0.69 ± 0.13 | 2.58 ± 1.06 | 81.63 ± 31.47 |
| CV | 0.74 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Cities and counties without dental schools (n = 17) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.54 ± 0.90 | 0.36 ± 0.52 | 0.36 ± 0.56 | 1.25 ± 1.85 | 34.81 ± 19.41 |
| CV | 1.66 | 1.45 | 1.57 | 1.48 | 0.56 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | 10∗ | 12 | 11∗ | 10∗ | 7∗ |
| Northern region (n = 6) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.80 ± 0.80 | 0.56 ± 0.59 | 0.31 ± 0.28 | 1.67 ± 1.62 | 69.93 ± 30.86 |
| CV | 1.00 | 1.05 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.44 |
| Central region (n = 5) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.32 ± 0.32 | 0.38 ± 0.44 | 0.28 ± 0.25 | 0.98 ± 0.91 | 42.24 ± 17.11 |
| CV | 1.01 | 1.16 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.40 |
| Southern region (n = 5) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.91 ± 1.40 | 0.65 ± 0.73 | 0.76 ± 0.92 | 2.33 ± 3.01 | 52.41 ± 27.95 |
| CV | 1.54 | 1.12 | 1.20 | 1.29 | 0.53 |
| Eastern region (n = 3) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.15 ± 0.25 | 0.07 ± 0.13 | 0.25 ± 0.23 | 0.47 ± 0.57 | 38.95 ± 7.74 |
| CV | 1.73 | 1.73 | 0.91 | 1.21 | 0.20 |
| Offshore islands (n = 2) | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.95 ± 1.35 | 0.36 ± 0.51 | 0.48 ± 0.67 | 1.79 ± 1.51 | 23.94 ± 14.62 |
| CV | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.85 | 0.61 |
| Kruskal–Wallis test | 2.54 | 3.44 | 0.97 | 3.07 | 6.26 |
∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; The item of Lienchiang County was excluded from the statistics of mean, SD and CV.
Mean ± SD = Mean ± standard deviation; CV = Coefficient of variation.
Figure 1Correlation of dentist index and dental student index according to municipalities and non-municipalities as well as cities with dental schools and cities and counties without dental schools in Taiwan in 2020. Upper: : The regression of municipalities (n = 6): y = 1.5964x – 65.357, R2 = 0.7521 (R = 0.87, P < 0.05). : The regression of non-municipalities (n = 15): y = 3.1635x – 119.67, R2 = 0.6332 (R = 0.80, P < 0.001). Lower: : The regression of cities with dental schools (n = 4): y = 1.2736x – 3.9321, R2 = 0.9334 (R = 0.97, P < 0.05). : The regression of cities and counties without dental schools (n = 17): y = 2.6278x – 99.498, R2 = 0.4925 (R = 0.70, P < 0.01). The regression for nationwide (n = 21): y = 1.8924x – 56.424, R2 = 0.5025 (R = 0.71, P < 0.001).