| Literature DB >> 33854705 |
Feng-Chou Cheng1, Tsui-Hua Liu1, Julia Yu-Fong Chang2,3,4, Tzu-Chiang Lin5, Po-Fang Tsai6, Yung-Ta Chang1, Chun-Pin Chiang2,3,4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Dental admission way; Dental freshmen; Surplus of dentists; Uneven distribution; Urban-rural gap
Year: 2020 PMID: 33854705 PMCID: PMC8025223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Distributions of enrolled dental freshmen in 22 cities and counties of Taiwan in 2020.
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipalities (n = 6) | ||||
| Taipei City | 50 | 5 | 53 | 108 |
| New Taipei City | 7 | 1 | 17 | 25 |
| Taoyuan City | 8 | 2 | 8 | 18 |
| Taichung City | 28 | 3 | 37 | 68 |
| Tainan City | 10 | 13 | 16 | 39 |
| Kaohsiung City | 21 | 3 | 24 | 48 |
| Non-municipalities (n = 16) | ||||
| Keelung City | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Hsinchu City | 3 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| Chiayi City | 6 | 4 | 10 | 20 |
| Hsinchu County | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Miaoli County | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Changhua County | 7 | 2 | 8 | 17 |
| Nantou County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Yunlin County | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Chiayi County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pingtung County | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Penghu County | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Yilan County | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Hualien County | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Taitung County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kinmen County | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lienchiang County | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nationwide (n = 22) | 146 | 41 | 199 | 386 |
| Mean | 6.64 | 1.86 | 9.05 | 17.55 |
Comparisons of enrolled dental freshmen in different regions of Taiwan in 2020.
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipalities (n = 6) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 124 (32.12) | 27 (6.99) | 155 (40.16) | 306 (79.27) |
| Mean | 20.67 | 4.5 | 25.83 | 51 |
| Non-municipalities (n = 16) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 22 (5.70) | 14 (3.63) | 44 (11.40) | 80 (20.73) |
| Mean | 1.38 | 0.88 | 2.75 | 5 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | 0.5∗∗∗ | 10.5∗∗ | 2.5∗∗∗ | 1∗∗∗ |
| Cities with dental schools (n = 4) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 109 (28.24) | 24 (6.22) | 130 (33.68) | 263 (68.13) |
| Mean | 27.25 | 6 | 32.5 | 65.75 |
| Cities and counties without dental schools (n = 18) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 37 (9.59) | 17 (4.40) | 69 (17.88) | 123 (31.87) |
| Mean | 2.06 | 0.94 | 3.83 | 6.83 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | <0.001∗∗∗ | 2∗∗ | 1∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Northern region (n = 6) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 69 (17.88) | 11 (2.85) | 91 (23.58) | 171 (44.30) |
| Mean | 11.5 | 1.83 | 15.17 | 28.5 |
| Central region (n = 5) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 37 (9.59) | 7 (1.81) | 48 (12.44) | 92 (23.83) |
| Mean | 7.4 | 1.4 | 9.6 | 18.4 |
| Southern region (n = 5) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 37 (9.59) | 20 (5.18) | 53 (13.73) | 110 (28.50) |
| Mean | 7.4 | 4 | 10.6 | 22 |
| Eastern region (n = 3) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 3 (0.78) | 2 (0.52) | 1 (0.26) | 6 (1.55) |
| Mean | 1 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 2 |
| Offshore islands (n = 3) | ||||
| Dental freshmen (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.26) | 6 (1.55) | 7 (1.81) |
| Mean | 0 | 0.33 | 2 | 2.33 |
| Kruskal–Wallis test | 5.48 | 3.92 | 6.13 | 4.69 |
∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Distributions of enrolled dental freshmen per 100,000 people in 22 cities and counties of Taiwan in 2020.
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taipei City | 1.90 | 0.19 | 2.02 | 4.11 |
| New Taipei City | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 0.62 |
| Taoyuan City | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.80 |
| Taichung City | 0.99 | 0.11 | 1.31 | 2.41 |
| Tainan City | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 2.08 |
| Kaohsiung City | 0.76 | 0.11 | 0.87 | 1.73 |
| Keelung City | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.81 |
| Hsinchu City | 0.67 | 0.22 | 2.45 | 3.33 |
| Chiayi City | 2.25 | 1.50 | 3.74 | 7.48 |
| Hsinchu County | 0 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.35 |
| Miaoli County | 0.18 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.37 |
| Changhua County | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.63 | 1.34 |
| Nantou County | 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 0.20 |
| Yunlin County | 0 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.59 |
| Chiayi County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pingtung County | 0 | 0 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Penghu County | 0 | 0.95 | 1.90 | 2.86 |
| Yilan County | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 1.10 |
| Hualien County | 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 |
| Taitung County | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kinmen County | 0 | 0 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Lienchiang County | 0 | 0 | 23.01 | 23.01 |
| Nationwide (n = 22) | 0.62 | 0.17 | 0.84 | 1.64 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.46 ± 0.61 | 0.25 ± 0.38 | 0.80 ± 0.98 | 1.50 ± 1.79 |
| CV | 1.34 | 1.52 | 1.22 | 1.19 |
The item of Lienchiang County was excluded from the statistics of mean, SD and CV.
Mean ± SD = Mean ± Standard Deviation; CV = Coefficient of Variance.
Comparisons of enrolled dental freshmen per 100,000 people in different regions of Taiwan in 2020.
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipalities (n = 6) | 0.76 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 1.88 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.79 ± 0.62 | 0.20 ± 0.25 | 0.97 ± 0.62 | 1.96 ± 1.27 |
| CV | 0.79 | 1.22 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| Non-municipalities (n = 15) | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.32 ± 0.58 | 0.27 ± 0.43 | 0.73 ± 1.10 | 1.32 ± 1.97 |
| CV | 1.77 | 1.59 | 1.51 | 1.49 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | 18∗ | 40 | 22 | 23 |
| Cities with dental schools (n = 4) | 1.08 | 0.24 | 1.29 | 2.61 |
| Mean ± SD | 1.05 ± 0.60 | 0.27 ± 0.28 | 1.26 ± 0.55 | 2.58 ± 1.06 |
| CV | 0.57 | 1.03 | 0.43 | 0.41 |
| Cities and counties without dental schools (n = 17) | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 0.91 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.32 ± 0.54 | 0.24 ± 0.40 | 0.69 ± 1.04 | 1.25 ± 1.85 |
| CV | 1.70 | 1.67 | 1.50 | 1.48 |
| Mann–Whitney U test | 6∗∗ | 24 | 11∗ | 10∗ |
| Northern region (n = 6) | 0.67 | 0.11 | 0.88 | 1.66 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.56 ± 0.69 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 1.01 | 1.67 ± 1.62 |
| CV | 1.23 | 0.56 | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| Central region (n = 5) | 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.83 | 1.59 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.39 ± 0.39 | 0.11 ± 0.12 | 0.48 ± 0.52 | 0.98 ± 0.91 |
| CV | 1.02 | 1.42 | 1.05 | 0.82 |
| Southern region (n = 5) | 0.59 | 0.32 | 0.85 | 1.76 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.71 ± 0.92 | 0.46 ± 0.65 | 1.17 ± 1.49 | 2.33 ± 3.01 |
| CV | 1.30 | 1.41 | 1.27 | 1.29 |
| Eastern region (n = 3) | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.60 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.25 ± 0.23 | 0.15 ± 0.25 | 0.07 ± 0.13 | 0.47 ± 0.57 |
| CV | 0.91 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.21 |
| Offshore islands (n = 2) | 0 | 0.41 | 1.23 | 1.63 |
| Mean ± SD | 0 | 0.48 ± 0.67 | 1.31 ± 0.84 | 1.79 ± 1.51 |
| CV | – | 1.41 | 0.64 | 0.85 |
| Kruskal–Wallis test | 3.26 | 1.23 | 6.38 | 3.07 |
∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01; The item of Lienchiang County was excluded from the statistics of mean, SD and CV.
Mean ± SD = Mean ± Standard Deviation; CV = Coefficient of Variance.
The distribution of enrolled dental freshmen in 5 different regions of Taiwan according to three different admission ways and the locations of dental schools in Taiwan in 2020.
| Enrolled dental freshmen | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern region | Central region | Southern region | Eastern region | Offshore islands | Total | ||
| Northern dental schools | Examination admission | 28 | 8 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 52 |
| Numerous stars initiatives admission | 4 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 16 | |
| Individual application admission | 51 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 86 | |
| Total | 83 | 29 | 37 | 2 | 3 | 154 | |
| Central dental schools | Examination admission | 30 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 64 |
| Numerous stars initiatives admission | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| Individual application admission | 21 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 53 | |
| Total | 55 | 39 | 30 | 1 | 3 | 128 | |
| Southern dental schools | Examination admission | 11 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 30 |
| Numerous stars initiatives admission | 3 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 14 | |
| Individual application admission | 19 | 13 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 60 | |
| Total | 33 | 24 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 104 | |
| Nationwide | Total | 171 | 92 | 110 | 6 | 7 | 386 |
The relationships between the regions of dental freshmen and the regions with dental schools or the three ways of admission for dental freshmen in Taiwan in 2020.
| Numbers of dental freshmen (%, AR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern dental freshmen | Central dental freshmen | Southern dental freshmen | |
| Northern dental schools | 86 (48.59%, 3.3) | 29 (29.29%, −2.4) | 41 (34.75%, −1.3) |
| Central dental schools | 57 (32.20%, −0.3) | 42 (42.42%, 2.3) | 31 (26.27%, −1.9) |
| Southern dental schools | 34 (19.21%, −3.3) | 28 (28.28%, 0.2) | 46 (38.98%, 3.4) |
| Total | 177 (100%) | 99 (100%) | 118 (100%) |
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | |
| Northern dental schools | 52 (35.62%, −1.3) | 28 (40%, 0.0) | 83 (42.78%, 1.2) |
| Central dental schools | 64 (43.84%, 3.5) | 18 (25.71%, −1.4) | 53 (27.42%, −2.3) |
| Southern dental schools | 30 (20.55%, −2.3) | 24 (34.29%, 1.4) | 58 (29.90%, 1.1) |
| Total | 146 (100%) | 70 (100%) | 194 (100%) |
| Examination admission | Numerous stars initiatives admission | Individual application admission | |
| Northern dental freshmen | 69 (48.25%, 1.0) | 18 (28.57%, −2.8) | 90 (47.87%, 1.1) |
| Central dental freshmen | 37 (25.87%, 0.3) | 15 (23.81%, −0.3) | 47 (25%, −0.1) |
| Southern dental freshmen | 37 (25.87%, −1.3) | 30 (47.62%, 3.3) | 51 (27.13%, −1.2) |
| Total | 143 (100%) | 63 (100%) | 188 (100%) |
AR = adjusted residual.
Pearson's chi-square analysis was used to determine whether there was a significant higher number of dental freshmen (AR value ≥ 2) or a significant smaller number of dental freshmen (AR value ≤ −2).