Literature DB >> 34482446

Distinguishing level-1 phylogenetic networks on the basis of data generated by Markov processes.

Elizabeth Gross1, Leo van Iersel2, Remie Janssen2, Mark Jones2, Colby Long3, Yukihiro Murakami4.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic networks can represent evolutionary events that cannot be described by phylogenetic trees. These networks are able to incorporate reticulate evolutionary events such as hybridization, introgression, and lateral gene transfer. Recently, network-based Markov models of DNA sequence evolution have been introduced along with model-based methods for reconstructing phylogenetic networks. For these methods to be consistent, the network parameter needs to be identifiable from data generated under the model. Here, we show that the semi-directed network parameter of a triangle-free, level-1 network model with any fixed number of reticulation vertices is generically identifiable under the Jukes-Cantor, Kimura 2-parameter, or Kimura 3-parameter constraints.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Identifiability; Markov processes; Phylogenetic networks; Reticulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34482446      PMCID: PMC8418599          DOI: 10.1007/s00285-021-01653-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  26 in total

1.  Reconstructing pedigrees: some identifiability questions for a recombination-mutation model.

Authors:  Bhalchandra D Thatte
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  The identifiability of tree topology for phylogenetic models, including covarion and mixture models.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; John A Rhodes
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  All that glisters is not galled.

Authors:  Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  On encodings of phylogenetic networks of bounded level.

Authors:  Philippe Gambette; Katharina T Huber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  A practical algorithm for reconstructing level-1 phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Leo van Iersel; Steven Kelk; Radosław Suchecki
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Inferring Phylogenetic Networks Using PhyloNet.

Authors:  Dingqiao Wen; Yun Yu; Jiafan Zhu; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 9.160

8.  How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories?

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Leo Van Iersel; Vincent Moulton; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Reconstructible phylogenetic networks: do not distinguish the indistinguishable.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Celine Scornavacca
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships.

Authors:  Cuong Than; Derek Ruths; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identifiability of species network topologies from genomic sequences using the logDet distance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; Hector Baños; John A Rhodes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.164

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.