Literature DB >> 21755321

On encodings of phylogenetic networks of bounded level.

Philippe Gambette1, Katharina T Huber.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic networks have now joined phylogenetic trees in the center of phylogenetics research. Like phylogenetic trees, such networks canonically induce collections of phylogenetic trees, clusters, and triplets, respectively. Thus it is not surprising that many network approaches aim to reconstruct a phylogenetic network from such collections. Related to the well-studied perfect phylogeny problem, the following question is of fundamental importance in this context: When does one of the above collections encode (i.e. uniquely describe) the network that induces it? For the large class of level-1 (phylogenetic) networks we characterize those level-1 networks for which an encoding in terms of one (or equivalently all) of the above collections exists. In addition, we show that three known distance measures for comparing phylogenetic networks are in fact metrics on the resulting subclass and give the diameter for two of them. Finally, we investigate the related concept of indistinguishability and also show that many properties enjoyed by level-1 networks are not satisfied by networks of higher level.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21755321     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0456-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  17 in total

1.  Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny.

Authors:  Barbara R Holland; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Peter J Lockhart
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic networks with constrained recombination.

Authors:  Dan Gusfield; Satish Eddhu; Charles Langley
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf       Date:  2003

3.  Phylogenetic networks: modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy.

Authors:  Bernard M E Moret; Luay Nakhleh; Tandy Warnow; C Randal Linder; Anna Tholse; Anneke Padolina; Jerry Sun; Ruth Timme
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Uniqueness, intractability and exact algorithms: reflections on level-k phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Leo Van Iersel; Steven Kelk; Matthias Mnich
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.122

5.  All that glisters is not galled.

Authors:  Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Metrics for phylogenetic networks II: nodal and triplets metrics.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Mercè Llabrés; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Mitochondrial portraits of human populations using median networks.

Authors:  H J Bandelt; P Forster; B C Sykes; M B Richards
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A distance metric for a class of tree-sibling phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Mercè Llabrés; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Phylogenetic networks from multi-labelled trees.

Authors:  K T Huber; V Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Characterization of reticulate networks based on the coalescent with recombination.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas; Gabriel Valiente; David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Spaces of phylogenetic networks from generalized nearest-neighbor interchange operations.

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Simone Linz; Vincent Moulton; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Reconstruction of LGT networks from tri-LGT-nets.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Joan Carles Pons
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Leo van Iersel; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  On the challenge of reconstructing level-1 phylogenetic networks from triplets and clusters.

Authors:  Philippe Gambette; K T Huber; S Kelk
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Distinguishing level-1 phylogenetic networks on the basis of data generated by Markov processes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross; Leo van Iersel; Remie Janssen; Mark Jones; Colby Long; Yukihiro Murakami
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories?

Authors:  Katharina T Huber; Leo Van Iersel; Vincent Moulton; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Reconstructible phylogenetic networks: do not distinguish the indistinguishable.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Celine Scornavacca
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Yun Yu; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Uprooted Phylogenetic Networks.

Authors:  P Gambette; K T Huber; G E Scholz
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 1.758

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.