| Literature DB >> 34479523 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is a rare genetic disorder of poor telomere maintenance. Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) related to DC is rarely reported. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Case report; Clinical features; Dyskeratosis congenita; Gene mutations; Prognosis; Pulmonary fibrosis; Systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34479523 PMCID: PMC8418029 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01645-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Fig. 1Typical mucocutaneous changes in a 23-year-old man: a, b Atrophic and dystrophic finger and toe nails. c Leukoplakia on the tongue. d Fine reticular pigmentation on the body
Fig. 2High resolution computed tomography manifestation of the patient. Chest high resolution computed tomography scan showed mid- and upper-zone predominant bilateral peripheral reticulolinear shadows, interlobular septal thickening with associated traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing, compatible with pulmonary fibrosis
Fig. 3Procedure of publication retrieval and inclusion and exclusion of cases displayed in a flow chart
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with DC-related PF (n = 27)
| Data | |
|---|---|
| Age at PF (years) | 32 (8–65) |
| Age at BMF (years) | 20 (1–65) |
| Male | 13/18 (72.2%) |
| Smoker | 8/17 (47.1%) |
| BMF | 20/24(83.3%) |
| Mild | 5 (25%) |
| Moderate | 3 (15%) |
| Severe | 12 (60%) |
| DC triad features* | |
| 0–1 | 3/18(16.7%) |
| 2–3 | 15/18 (83.3%) |
| Family history of DC | 8/16 (50%) |
| PFT | |
| FEV1, %pred † | 47 ± 15 |
| FVC, %pred ‡ | 47 ± 20 |
| FEV1/FVC ratio§ | 93 ± 7 |
| TLC, %pred§ | 54 ± 14 |
| DLCO, %pred|| | 38 ± 14 |
Data are presented as mean (range) or mean ± standard deviation or number/total number of patients with available data (%). PF: pulmonary fibrosis; BMF: bone marrow failure
DC: dyskeratosis congenital; PFT: pulmonary function test; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; TLC: total lung capacity; DLCO: diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide
*DC triad features refer to oral leukoplakia, dysplastic nails and abnormal skin pigmentation
†FEV1 was available in 9 patients
‡FVC was available in 11 patients
§FEV1/FVC and TLC was available in 8 patients
||DLCO was available in 15 patients
Fig. 4Frequency of radiological patterns on chest CT of patients with DC-related PF (n = 26). The bars indicated the frequencies of each radiological pattern with the percentage displayed within the bars
Relationship between radiological patterns and histopathological patterns (n = 10)
| CT patterns | Histopathological patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UIP (n = 6) | Probable UIP (n = 1) | Not-UIP (n = 2) | Possible UIP (n = 1) | |
| UIP (n = 3) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Possible UIP (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Compatible with NSIP (n = 2) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Inconsistent with UIP (n = 4) | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
UIP: unusual interstitial pneumonia; NSIP: nonspecific interstitial pneumonia;
Clinical characteristics of patients with early-onset or later-onset PF (n = 27) and with different gene mutations (n = 16)
| Variable | Early-onset (n = 16) | Later-onset (n = 11) | TERC/TERT (n = 5) | TINF2 (n = 6) | DKC1/NHP2 (n = 5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at BMF* (year) | 9 ± 8 | 30 ± 23 | 43 ± 14 | 4 ± 4 | 23 ± 21 | ||
| Age at PF (year) | / | / | 56 ± 8 | 24 ± 13 | 36 ± 16 | ||
| BMF (moderate to severe) | 13/16 (81.3) | 2/8 (25.0) | 1/2 (50.0) | 4/6 (66.7) | 3/5 (60.0) | 1.000 | |
| CT patterns | |||||||
| UIP/possible UIP | 7/15 (46.6) | 6/11 (54.5) | 1.000 | 4/5 (80.0) | 3/6 (50.0) | 2/5 (40.0) | > 0.05# |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number/total number of the patients with available data (%)
DC: dyskeratosis congenital; BMF: bone marrow failure; PF: pulmonary fibrosis; CT: computed tomography; UIP: unusual interstitial pneumonia;/: not applicable
*Age at BMF was unavailable in 1 patient with later-onset PF and 1 patient with TINF2 variants
†TERC/TERT versus TINF2, P = 0.006; TINF2 versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 0.277; TERC/TERT versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 0.266
‡TERC/TERT versus TINF2, P = 0.001; TINF2 versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 0.137; TERC/TERT versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 0.028
#TERC/TERT versus TINF2, P = 0.545; TINF2 versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 1.000; TERC/TERT versus DKC1/NHP2, P = 0.524
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of telomere maintenance gene mutations in DC-related PF patients. Patients with mutations in TINF2 gene or DKC1/NHP2 gene had significantly worse transplant-free survival than those with variants in TERC/TERT/RTEL1/PARN gene (TINF2 gene vs TERC/TERT/RTEL1/PARN gene p = 0.013; DKC1/NHP2 gene vs TERC/TERT/RTEL1/PARN gene p = 0.027); No survival difference between TINF2 gene and DKC1/NHP2 gene was found (p = 0.684)
Fig. 6Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of surgical lung biopsy and immunosuppression therapy in DC-related PF patients: a patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy (“SLB”) had significantly worse transplant-free survival than those without (p = 0.042). b A worse survival was found in the patients with immunosuppression (“IS”) therapy compared to those without (p = 0.012)