Literature DB >> 34473883

A case of an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with distinctive histology in the pineal region in an adult patient.

Masatomo Doi1, Junki Koike1, Yasuyuki Yoshida2, Hisao Nakamura3, Motohiro Chosokabe1, Saeko Naruki1, Shinya Tajima1, Akira Endo1, Takashi Matsumori2, Yuichiro Tanaka2.   

Abstract

A 31-year-old man suffered from headaches and presented at a hospital after the symptom worsened. Obstructive hydrocephalus and a pineal tumor were identified, and he was transferred to our hospital for further investigation and treatment. Cranial computed tomography revealed a hypodense mass lesion on the right of the pineal region, and calcifications and enlargement of the lateral and third cerebral ventricles were also evident. Blood tests were negative for all tumor markers. Laparoscopic biopsy and third-ventricle fenestration were performed that day as an emergency surgery to treat the obstructive hydrocephalus. Postoperative cranial magnetic resonance imaging revealed a solid tumor that was hypointense on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging, and heterogeneously enhanced by Gd. Subsequently, the tumor increased in size, and craniotomy and tumorectomy were performed. Histologically, the tumor proliferated as round or short spindle-shaped cells in a myxoid matrix, forming arrays that surrounded the blood vessels. As a few cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were also present and immunostaining for INI-1 was negative, the patient was diagnosed with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT). AT/RT of the pineal region in adults is rare, and herein, we report the morphological characteristics of this case and reviewed the relevant literature.
© 2021 The Authors. Pathology International published by Japanese Society of Pathology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT); craniotomy; headache; obstructive hydrocephalus; pineal region

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34473883      PMCID: PMC9292907          DOI: 10.1111/pin.13159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Int        ISSN: 1320-5463            Impact factor:   2.121


α‐smooth muscle actin teratoid/rhabdoid tumor computed tomography desmoplastic myxoid tumor epithelial membrane antigen glial fibrillary acidic protein integrase interactor 1 magnetic resonance imaging oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 World Health Organization

INTRODUCTION

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is an exceptionally malignant childhood tumor of the central nervous system, and it was first proposed as a disease concept by Rorke et al. in 1996. It appears as rhabdoid cells, exhibits diverse tendencies to differentiate, and is classified as grade IV according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Epidemiologically, it most often occurs in children under 3 years of age, affecting a slightly higher number of males with a tendency to be more common in Caucasians. , According to a survey by Lau et al., adults accounted for 3 out of 174 cases (1.7%), and the pineal gland was extremely small in six cases (3.4%). We treated an adult patient with AT/RT of the pineal region that exhibited distinctive histology. Herein, we report this case together with a review of relevant literature. This was an extremely rare case in which the age at onset, site, and histological presentation were all atypical of AT/RT.

CLINICAL SUMMARY

A 31‐year‐old man presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of headache. His medical history was not significant, and he had no relevant medication history. He and his family had no history of malignancy. The patient had suffered from dull, non‐pulsatile headaches for 1 month before the admission. His symptom worsened 3 days before admission, and the pain became extreme, limiting his mobility; therefore, he visited a hospital. Cranial computed tomography (CT) scan revealed obstructive hydrocephalus and a pineal tumor; thus, he was transferred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. On arrival, a cranial CT (Figure 1a) scan revealed a hypodense mass lesion on the right of the pineal region. Calcifications and enlargement of the lateral and third cerebral ventricles were also evident. Blood tests were negative for all tumor markers. Endoscopic biopsy and third‐ventricle fenestration were performed that day as an emergency surgery to treat the obstructive hydrocephalus. Postoperative CT (Figure 1b) scan showed that the ventricle had decreased in size, and the patient's headache was also significantly ameliorated. Postoperative cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a solid tumor that was hypointense on T1‐weighted imaging, hyperintense on T2‐weighted imaging, and heterogeneously enhanced by Gd (Figure 1c–e). The tumor subsequently increased in size, and craniotomy and tumorectomy were performed. After surgery, treatment with a modified IRS‐III protocol was selected. However, cerebrospinal fluid dissemination was observed 4 months after the biopsy, and the patient died in 13 months. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Figure 1

Imaging results. (a) Cranial CT scan on admission. A hypodense mass lesion can be seen in the pineal region. (b) CT scan after the third cerebral ventricle fenestration. The size of the ventricle had decreased. (c–e) Cranial MRI scan. The mass was hypointense on T1‐weighted imaging (c). On T2‐weighted imaging, it was hyperintense, with punctate hypointensities in its interior (d). It was heterogeneously enhanced by Gd (e). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

Imaging results. (a) Cranial CT scan on admission. A hypodense mass lesion can be seen in the pineal region. (b) CT scan after the third cerebral ventricle fenestration. The size of the ventricle had decreased. (c–e) Cranial MRI scan. The mass was hypointense on T1‐weighted imaging (c). On T2‐weighted imaging, it was hyperintense, with punctate hypointensities in its interior (d). It was heterogeneously enhanced by Gd (e). CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS

In the initial biopsy, areas of small cells that formed arrays that encircled the surrounding blood vessels were observed, but only a small part of the lesion was sampled, and a definitive diagnosis was not reached (Figure 2a). After tumor removal, histological examination revealed the proliferation of relatively small tumor cells against the background of a large amount of myxoid matrix. The tumor cells formed arrays that surrounded the blood vessels via the proliferation of round to short spindle‐shaped cells that were loosely bound together (Figure 2b). A few small rhabdoid cells were also present (Figure 2c).
Figure 2

HE staining and special staining. (a) HE of initial biopsy. A few small tumor cells surrounding the blood vessels were evident. (b) Resected specimen. Circular to short spindle‐shaped tumor cells proliferated in regions around the blood vessels. The myxoid matrix can also be discerned in the background. (c) A few tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were also present (arrow). (d) Alcian blue staining. A large amount of mucus matrix can be seen in the background. HE, hematoxylin and eosin

HE staining and special staining. (a) HE of initial biopsy. A few small tumor cells surrounding the blood vessels were evident. (b) Resected specimen. Circular to short spindle‐shaped tumor cells proliferated in regions around the blood vessels. The myxoid matrix can also be discerned in the background. (c) A few tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were also present (arrow). (d) Alcian blue staining. A large amount of mucus matrix can be seen in the background. HE, hematoxylin and eosin Alcian blue staining revealed a mucus matrix in the background of the tumor (Figure 2d). Immunohistochemical staining was performed with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor sections. Table 1 summarizes the antibodies used and the staining conditions. Some antibodies were activated by heat treatment at 96°C for 40 min using a water bath. In immunohistochemical staining, although the tumor cells were diffusely positive for vimentin (Figure 3a), they were negative for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S‐100, CD34, and oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (olig2). A few tumor cells were also positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) or α‐smooth muscle actin (αSMA) (Figure 3b,c), and approximately 10% for Ki‐67. The tumor cells were also negative for integrase interactor 1 (INI‐1) staining, which was conducted simultaneously (Figure 3d). From these findings, the patient was diagnosed with AT/RT in the pineal region.
Table 1

Antibodies used for immunohistochemical staining

AntibodyCloneDilution rateManufacturerLocationActivation
INI‐125/BAF471:50BD BiosciencesSan Jose, CA, USACitric acid buffer (pH 6)
VimentinV9Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USADistilled water
EMAE29Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USA
αSMA1A41:500Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USA
GFAP6F21:2000Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USADistilled water
CK (CAM5.2)CAM5.2BD BiosciencesSan Jose, CA, USA
NFP2F111:200Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USADistilled water
Ki‐67MIB‐11:200Agilent DakoSanta Clara, CA, USACitric acid buffer (pH 9)

Abbreviations: αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1; NFP, neurofilament protein.

Figure 3

Immunohistochemical staining. (a) Vimentin. Diffuse positive staining was apparent. (b) EMA. Some tumor cells were stained positive (approximately 3%). (c) αSMA. A few positive‐stained cells were present (< 1%). (d) INI‐1. The tumor cells were negative. αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1

Antibodies used for immunohistochemical staining Abbreviations: αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1; NFP, neurofilament protein. Immunohistochemical staining. (a) Vimentin. Diffuse positive staining was apparent. (b) EMA. Some tumor cells were stained positive (approximately 3%). (c) αSMA. A few positive‐stained cells were present (< 1%). (d) INI‐1. The tumor cells were negative. αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1

DISCUSSION

A typical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors are rare tumors, accounting for only approximately 1%–2% of childhood brain tumors. , It is a highly malignant brain tumor that is classified as grade IV according to the WHO classification. In most cases, it appears before the age of 3 years, but it also rarely occurs in adults. It may occur in various supratentorial and infratentorial locations, but most cases are in the posterior cranial fossa; in the supratentorial region, it tends to be found in the cerebral hemispheres. It commonly occurs in the frontal lobe in adults, and its occurrence in the pineal region is exceptionally rare. It has been reported that the frequency of adult‐onset AT/RT is approximately 1.7% of AT/RT cases. Furthermore, according to a survey by Mathkour et al., only 9 of the 85 adult‐onset AT/RTs occurred in the pineal gland, establishing its rarity. Morphologically, it is characterized by predominantly undifferentiated elements, a diverse variety of histological presentations, and the appearance of rhabdoid cells. These cells possess unevenly distributed nuclei and a large amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm; they typically contain eosinophilic inclusion bodies within their cytoplasm. In terms of molecular genetics, they are characterized by the inactivation of the SMARCB1 (INI1) gene and that of the SMARCA4 (BRG1) gene in extremely rare cases. SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 are nuclear proteins that are expressed in cells throughout the body. Immunohistochemical staining revealed the lack of INI1 and BRG1 expression, reflecting the inactivation of these genes. Another characteristic is that a wide range of different cell lineage markers is expressed in varying proportions, with cells staining positive for vimentin, EMA, and αSMA in many cases and sometimes expressing cytokeratin, GFAP, and neurofilament protein. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the pineal region in adults was first reported in 1999 by Sugita et al. as a pineal malignant rhabdoid tumor; thereafter, only nine cases have been reported to date, making our patient 10th in the list (Table 2). , , , , , , , , Considering the radiographic images, adult pineal AT/RT examined by Kanoto et al. in 2015 was considered to be the same as the case reported by Kuge et al. in 2012; therefore, it was counted as one case. The age of these patients ranged from 19 to 45 years and comprised four men and six women. On immunohistochemical staining, 7/7 patients were positive for vimentin, 10/10 for EMA, and 8/10 for αSMA. Approximately 60% of the patients were positive for GFAP (5/8) and cytokeratin (3/5), and 25% of the patients (1/4) were positive for neurofilament protein. INI‐1 expression was not observed in 9/9 cases.
Table 2

Reported adult cases of AT/RT in the pineal region

YearAuthorAge (years)SexINI‐1VimentinEMAαSMAGFAPCKNFP
1999Sugita et al. 7 27MN/A
2006Ingold et al. 8 45FN/AN/A
2010Takei et al. 9 33F
2011Shonka et al. 10 33FN/AN/AN/AN/A
2012Kuge et al. 11 20FN/A
2014Yang et al. 12 40FN/A
2017Liebigt et al. 13 19MN/AN/AN/A
2020Monteiro et al. 14 41FN/AN/A
2020Mathkour et al. 6 29MN/AN/AN/A
2021Present case31M

Abbreviations: αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; AT/RT, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; F, female; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1; M, male; N/A, not available; NFP, neurofilament protein.

Reported adult cases of AT/RT in the pineal region Abbreviations: αSMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; AT/RT, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor; CK, cytokeratin; EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; F, female; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; INI‐1, integrase interactor 1; M, male; N/A, not available; NFP, neurofilament protein. Overall, rhabdoid cells were unclear in our patient, and the main growth pattern consisted of comparatively small, short spindle‐shaped tumor cells proliferating around the blood vessels against the background of a mucus matrix. From the morphological perspective, we first considered the possibility of pilomyxoid astrocytoma or another form of glioma. However, the neuroepithelial markers of GAFP, olig2, and S‐100 were all negative on immunohistochemical staining, and therefore, glioma was excluded. AT/RT was included in the differential diagnosis because vimentin, EMA, and αSMA were all positive to varying extents, and the tumor contained a few small eosinophilic cells. This diagnosis became definitive when screening for INI‐1, revealing the lack of INI‐1 expression. AT/RT may be considered when rhabdoid cells account for the majority of tumor cells or if the growth pattern consists of classic medulloblasts or PNET‐type undifferentiated cells, but the presence of a large amount of mucus matrix in the background and a growth pattern that superficially resembles that of glioma are both atypical of AT/RT, and it was difficult to reach a definitive diagnosis. Recently, Thomas et al. reported desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT), SMARCB1‐mutant as an INI‐1‐negative tumor that develops in the pineal gland from adolescence to adulthood. Histologically, the tumor cells are small to medium sized, oval to spindle shaped, and epithelioid like. They are characterized by highly desmoplastic stromal components and mucoid substances. Hence, AT/RT of the pineal region in adults, consisting of small short spindle‐shaped cells with abundant mucus matrix as in the present case, must be carefully distinguished from DMT, SMARCB1‐mutant. Clinically, DMT, SMARCB1‐mutant has a better prognosis than AT/RT, and no metastasis or dissemination has been reported to date. , , However, in this case, cerebrospinal fluid dissemination occurred 4 months after the initial surgery, the disease progressed rapidly, and the patient died in 13 months. Histologically, although there were similarities in the cell images of hematoxylin and eosin staining, the desmoplastic change was unclear and contained a small amount of rhabdoid cells. In addition, in the nine cases of DMT , , reported to date, six out of eight cases were CD34‐positive, and in seven of the nine cases, Ki‐67 level was 5% or less. However, in the present case, CD34 was negative and Ki‐67 was as high as approximately 10%. Hence, these are the clinical pathologies that should be noted in AT/RT occurring in the pineal region in adults, and they are different from those of DMT, SMARCB1‐mutant. As AT/RT occurring in the pineal gland is extremely rare, even in pediatric cases, there are only a few case reports. , According to a report of Meyers et al., out of 17 cases, one showed the occurrence of tumor in the pineal gland and two from the pineal gland to the dorsal midbrain, which also spread to the cerebellum. In general, AT/RT may partially exhibit proliferation of spindle‐shaped cells and the presence of mucus matrix. However, as there are no reports of such morphologies, caution should be exerted during differentiation. To the best of our knowledge, reports on AT/RT with abundant spindle‐shaped cells are extremely rare, and the only case report that focused on and emphasized its morphological images is in an adult patient. The patient had a lesion in the left occipital lobe with abundant spindle‐shaped cells that exhibited a characteristic histology showing nuclear palisading and perivascular pseudorosettes. On the contrary, in the present case, the lesion was fully composed of short spindle‐shaped cells and mucus matrix, which can be considered a very rare morphological image. However, no clear nuclear palisading or perivascular pseudorosettes were observed. In conclusion, we treated an adult patient with AT/RT in the pineal region that exhibited distinctive histology. This case apprised us of the difficulty in reaching a definitive diagnosis as pathologists.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Masatomo Doi and Junki Koike performed histological evaluation and drafted the manuscript and figures. Motohiro Chosokabe, Saeko Naruki, Shinya Tajima, and Akira Endo performed histological evaluation. Hisao Nakamura performed image analysis and provided image data. Yasuyuki Yoshida, Takashi Matsumori, and Yuichiro Tanaka provided clinical information of the patient. All authors contributed to discussions and agreed on the final version of the submitted manuscript.
  23 in total

1.  Primary intracranial atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood: MRI features and patient outcomes.

Authors:  S P Meyers; Z P Khademian; J A Biegel; S H Chuang; D N Korones; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-mutant: a new variant of SMARCB1-deficient tumor of the central nervous system preferentially arising in the pineal region.

Authors:  Nozomi Matsumura; Naoki Goda; Konomi Yashige; Masashi Kitagawa; Tatsuya Yamazaki; Sumihito Nobusawa; Hideaki Yokoo
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A case of desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1 mutant, in the pineal region.

Authors:  Yue-E Wang; Jing-Jing Chen; Wei Wang; An-Li Zhang; Wenchao Zhou; Hai-Bo Wu
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.906

4.  Desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-mutant: clinical, histopathological and molecular characterization of a pineal region tumor encountered in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Christian Thomas; Annika Wefers; Susanne Bens; Karolina Nemes; Abbas Agaimy; Florian Oyen; Silke Vogelgesang; Fausto J Rodriguez; Francesca M Brett; Roger McLendon; Istvan Bodi; Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; Kathy Keyvani; Stefan Tippelt; Frantz R Poulsen; Eric S Lipp; Caterina Giannini; Guido Reifenberger; Klaus Kuchelmeister; Torsten Pietsch; Uwe Kordes; Reiner Siebert; Michael C Frühwald; Pascal D Johann; Martin Sill; Marcel Kool; Andreas von Deimling; Werner Paulus; Martin Hasselblatt
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Pineal Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor in a 5-Month-Old Child.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Gendle; Madhivanan Karthigeyan; Pravin Salunke; Kirti Gupta
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.162

6.  Primary pediatric brain tumors: statistics of Taipei VGH, Taiwan (1975-2004).

Authors:  Tai-Tong Wong; Donald M Ho; Kai-Ping Chang; Sang-Hue Yen; Wan-You Guo; Feng-Chi Chang; Muh-Lii Liang; Hung-Chi Pan; Wen-Yuh Chung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood: definition of an entity.

Authors:  L B Rorke; R J Packer; J A Biegel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor of the Pineal Region in a Young Adult Male Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Susan Liebigt; Axel Florschütz; Nicole Arndt; Karsten Stock; Christof Renner
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 1.268

9.  Paediatric atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour of the pineal region mimicking a meningioma: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xuanyu Tan; Mengliang Xiao; Wei Jiang; Cao Yue; Limei Qu; Gang Zhao
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors in adults: a case report and treatment-focused review.

Authors:  Nicole A Shonka; Terri S Armstrong; Sujit S Prabhu; Amanda Childress; Shauna Choi; Lauren A Langford; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-04-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A case of an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor with distinctive histology in the pineal region in an adult patient.

Authors:  Masatomo Doi; Junki Koike; Yasuyuki Yoshida; Hisao Nakamura; Motohiro Chosokabe; Saeko Naruki; Shinya Tajima; Akira Endo; Takashi Matsumori; Yuichiro Tanaka
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.121

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.