Literature DB >> 34467389

Education and Income Show Heterogeneous Relationships to Lifespan Brain and Cognitive Differences Across European and US Cohorts.

Kristine B Walhovd1,2, Anders M Fjell1,2, Yunpeng Wang1, Inge K Amlien1, Athanasia M Mowinckel1, Ulman Lindenberger3,4, Sandra Düzel3, David Bartrés-Faz5, Klaus P Ebmeier6, Christian A Drevon7,8, William F C Baaré9, Paolo Ghisletta10,11,12, Louise Baruël Johansen9,13, Rogier A Kievit14,15, Richard N Henson14, Kathrine Skak Madsen9,16, Lars Nyberg1,17,18,19, Jennifer R Harris20, Cristina Solé-Padullés5, Sara Pudas17,19, Øystein Sørensen1, René Westerhausen1, Enikő Zsoldos6,21, Laura Nawijn22, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad23, Sana Suri6,21, Brenda Penninx22, Ole J Rogeberg24, Andreas M Brandmaier3,4.   

Abstract

Higher socio-economic status (SES) has been proposed to have facilitating and protective effects on brain and cognition. We ask whether relationships between SES, brain volumes and cognitive ability differ across cohorts, by age and national origin. European and US cohorts covering the lifespan were studied (4-97 years, N = 500 000; 54 000 w/brain imaging). There was substantial heterogeneity across cohorts for all associations. Education was positively related to intracranial (ICV) and total gray matter (GM) volume. Income was related to ICV, but not GM. We did not observe reliable differences in associations as a function of age. SES was more strongly related to brain and cognition in US than European cohorts. Sample representativity varies, and this study cannot identify mechanisms underlying differences in associations across cohorts. Differences in neuroanatomical volumes partially explained SES-cognition relationships. SES was more strongly related to ICV than to GM, implying that SES-cognition relations in adulthood are less likely grounded in neuroprotective effects on GM volume in aging. The relatively stronger SES-ICV associations rather are compatible with SES-brain volume relationships being established early in life, as ICV stabilizes in childhood. The findings underscore that SES has no uniform association with, or impact on, brain and cognition.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain; cognitive function; lifespan; socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34467389      PMCID: PMC8841563          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  69 in total

1.  Age-related differences in default-mode network connectivity in response to intermittent theta-burst stimulation and its relationships with maintained cognition and brain integrity in healthy aging.

Authors:  Kilian Abellaneda-Pérez; Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar; Dídac Vidal-Piñeiro; Ali Jannati; Elisabeth Solana; Núria Bargalló; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stuart J Ritchie; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  Biological Psychiatry and Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Martha J Farah
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Task-dependent activity and connectivity predict episodic memory network-based responses to brain stimulation in healthy aging.

Authors:  Dídac Vidal-Piñeiro; Pablo Martin-Trias; Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo; Roser Sala-Llonch; Imma C Clemente; Isaias Mena-Sánchez; Núria Bargalló; Carles Falcón; Álvaro Pascual-Leone; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Neuroinflammation and Tau Interact with Amyloid in Predicting Sleep Problems in Aging Independently of Atrophy.

Authors:  Anders Martin Fjell; Ane-Victoria Idland; Roser Sala-Llonch; Leiv Otto Watne; Tom Borza; Anne Brækhus; Tarjei Lona; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Torgeir Bruun Wyller; Kristine Beate Walhovd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Genetic architecture of subcortical brain regions: common and region-specific genetic contributions.

Authors:  M E Rentería; N K Hansell; L T Strike; K L McMahon; G I de Zubicaray; I B Hickie; P M Thompson; N G Martin; S E Medland; M J Wright
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  The influence of socioeconomic status on children's brain structure.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jednoróg; Irene Altarelli; Karla Monzalvo; Joel Fluss; Jessica Dubois; Catherine Billard; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Franck Ramus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neurocognitive reorganization between crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence and white matter microstructure in two age-heterogeneous developmental cohorts.

Authors:  Ivan L Simpson-Kent; Delia Fuhrmann; Joe Bathelt; Jascha Achterberg; Gesa Sophia Borgeest; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Role of Educational Exposure in the Association Between Myopia and Birth Order.

Authors:  Jeremy A Guggenheim; Cathy Williams
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 10.  Is intracranial volume a suitable proxy for brain reserve?

Authors:  Anna Catharina van Loenhoud; Colin Groot; Jacob William Vogel; Wiesje Maria van der Flier; Rik Ossenkoppele
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Human brain anatomy reflects separable genetic and environmental components of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Hyeokmoon Kweon; Gökhan Aydogan; Alain Dagher; Danilo Bzdok; Christian C Ruff; Gideon Nave; Martha J Farah; Philipp D Koellinger
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 14.957

2.  Brain aging differs with cognitive ability regardless of education.

Authors:  Kristine B Walhovd; Lars Nyberg; Ulman Lindenberger; Inge K Amlien; Øystein Sørensen; Yunpeng Wang; Athanasia M Mowinckel; Rogier A Kievit; Klaus P Ebmeier; David Bartrés-Faz; Simone Kühn; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Paolo Ghisletta; Kathrine Skak Madsen; Willliam F C Baaré; Enikő Zsoldos; Fredrik Magnussen; Didac Vidal-Piñeiro; Brenda Penninx; Anders M Fjell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.