Literature DB >> 34464250

Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: Predictors of deferred intervention and treatment choice.

Rashid K Sayyid1, Laurence Klotz2, John Z Benton3, Merry Ma1, Phillip Woodruff1, Raj Satkunasivam4, Martha K Terris1,5, Christopher J D Wallis6, Zachary Klaassen1,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly used for favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to determine oncological and sociodemographic predictors of deferred definitive therapy and decision for radical prostatectomy (RP) vs. radiotherapy (RT).
METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify all FIR PCa diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 opting for AS for at least one year following diagnosis. We sought to determine predictors of treatment and treatment type using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 20 334 patients were identified. An annual decrease in incident FIR patients managed initially with AS between 2010 (4061) and 2015 (2947) was noted (p for trend <0.001); 17 895 (88.0%) patients underwent deferred RP and/or RT. Patients with higher baseline cancer volume and clinical stage were significantly more likely to discontinue AS. Patients of higher socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo deferred therapy, with increased odds for RT over RP. African American patients had lower odds of undergoing definitive intervention (odds ratio 0.83, p=0.030) and were significantly more likely to opt for XRT. Oncological characteristics leading to FIR classification influenced treatment choice at the time of deferred intervention: RT was treatment of choice in 86.3% and 86.0% of Gleason group 2 and prostate-specific antigen 10-20 FIR patients, respectively; 96.1% of treated cT2b-c FIR patients opted for RP.
CONCLUSIONS: Most FIR PCa patients initially managed with AS eventually undergo deferred definitive therapy, with choice of treatment significantly influenced by patients' baseline oncological and sociodemographic characteristics.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34464250      PMCID: PMC8937595          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  29 in total

1.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

2.  Increasing Utilization of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Mina M Fam; Jonathan G Yabes; Liam C Macleod; Jathin Bandari; Robert M Turner; Samia H Lopa; Alessandro Furlan; Christopher P Filson; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Seeking the Truth: Understanding the Impact of Missing Data on the Validity of the New Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting Database.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Christopher J D Wallis
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend.

Authors:  J Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Factors associated with physician follow-up among patients with chest pain discharged from the emergency department.

Authors:  Michael K Y Wong; Julie T Wang; Andrew Czarnecki; Maria Koh; Jack V Tu; Michael J Schull; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Ching Lau; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Patterns and predictors of metastases-A contemporary population-based series.

Authors:  Thenappan Chandrasekar; Zachary Klaassen; Hanan Goldberg; Girish S Kulkarni; Robert J Hamilton; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prevalence of prostate cancer on autopsy: cross-sectional study on unscreened Caucasian and Asian men.

Authors:  Alexandre R Zlotta; Shin Egawa; Dmitry Pushkar; Alexander Govorov; Takahiro Kimura; Masahito Kido; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Cynthia Kuk; Marta Kovylina; Najla Aldaoud; Neil Fleshner; Antonio Finelli; Laurence Klotz; Jenna Sykes; Gina Lockwood; Theodorus H van der Kwast
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Nicole Benfante; Ricardo Alvim; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michal Wiseman; Maha Mamoor; Behfar Ehdaie; Vincent Laudone; Peter Scardino; James Eastham; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.