Rashid K Sayyid1, Laurence Klotz2, John Z Benton3, Merry Ma1, Phillip Woodruff1, Raj Satkunasivam4, Martha K Terris1,5, Christopher J D Wallis6, Zachary Klaassen1,5. 1. Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States. 2. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, United States. 4. Department of Urology and Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States. 5. Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, United States. 6. Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly used for favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to determine oncological and sociodemographic predictors of deferred definitive therapy and decision for radical prostatectomy (RP) vs. radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify all FIR PCa diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 opting for AS for at least one year following diagnosis. We sought to determine predictors of treatment and treatment type using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 20 334 patients were identified. An annual decrease in incident FIR patients managed initially with AS between 2010 (4061) and 2015 (2947) was noted (p for trend <0.001); 17 895 (88.0%) patients underwent deferred RP and/or RT. Patients with higher baseline cancer volume and clinical stage were significantly more likely to discontinue AS. Patients of higher socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo deferred therapy, with increased odds for RT over RP. African American patients had lower odds of undergoing definitive intervention (odds ratio 0.83, p=0.030) and were significantly more likely to opt for XRT. Oncological characteristics leading to FIR classification influenced treatment choice at the time of deferred intervention: RT was treatment of choice in 86.3% and 86.0% of Gleason group 2 and prostate-specific antigen 10-20 FIR patients, respectively; 96.1% of treated cT2b-c FIR patients opted for RP. CONCLUSIONS: Most FIR PCa patients initially managed with AS eventually undergo deferred definitive therapy, with choice of treatment significantly influenced by patients' baseline oncological and sociodemographic characteristics.
INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly used for favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to determine oncological and sociodemographic predictors of deferred definitive therapy and decision for radical prostatectomy (RP) vs. radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify all FIR PCa diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 opting for AS for at least one year following diagnosis. We sought to determine predictors of treatment and treatment type using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 20 334 patients were identified. An annual decrease in incident FIR patients managed initially with AS between 2010 (4061) and 2015 (2947) was noted (p for trend <0.001); 17 895 (88.0%) patients underwent deferred RP and/or RT. Patients with higher baseline cancer volume and clinical stage were significantly more likely to discontinue AS. Patients of higher socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo deferred therapy, with increased odds for RT over RP. African American patients had lower odds of undergoing definitive intervention (odds ratio 0.83, p=0.030) and were significantly more likely to opt for XRT. Oncological characteristics leading to FIR classification influenced treatment choice at the time of deferred intervention: RT was treatment of choice in 86.3% and 86.0% of Gleason group 2 and prostate-specific antigen 10-20 FIR patients, respectively; 96.1% of treated cT2b-c FIR patients opted for RP. CONCLUSIONS: Most FIR PCa patients initially managed with AS eventually undergo deferred definitive therapy, with choice of treatment significantly influenced by patients' baseline oncological and sociodemographic characteristics.
Authors: Mina M Fam; Jonathan G Yabes; Liam C Macleod; Jathin Bandari; Robert M Turner; Samia H Lopa; Alessandro Furlan; Christopher P Filson; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs Journal: Urology Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Michael K Y Wong; Julie T Wang; Andrew Czarnecki; Maria Koh; Jack V Tu; Michael J Schull; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Ching Lau; Dennis T Ko Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Alexandre R Zlotta; Shin Egawa; Dmitry Pushkar; Alexander Govorov; Takahiro Kimura; Masahito Kido; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Cynthia Kuk; Marta Kovylina; Najla Aldaoud; Neil Fleshner; Antonio Finelli; Laurence Klotz; Jenna Sykes; Gina Lockwood; Theodorus H van der Kwast Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sigrid Carlsson; Nicole Benfante; Ricardo Alvim; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michal Wiseman; Maha Mamoor; Behfar Ehdaie; Vincent Laudone; Peter Scardino; James Eastham; Karim Touijer Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 7.450