Literature DB >> 25712950

Factors associated with physician follow-up among patients with chest pain discharged from the emergency department.

Michael K Y Wong1, Julie T Wang1, Andrew Czarnecki1, Maria Koh1, Jack V Tu1, Michael J Schull1, Harindra C Wijeysundera1, Ching Lau1, Dennis T Ko2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chest pain do not receive follow-up from a physician after discharge from the emergency department despite significant survival benefit associated with follow-up care. Our objective was to evaluate factors associated with physician follow-up to understand this gap in practice.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study involving patients at high risk who were assessed for chest pain and discharged from an emergency department in Ontario between April 2004 and March 2010. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of clinical and nonclinical characteristics with physician follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 56 767 patients, of whom 25.1% did not receive any follow-up by a physician, 69.0% were seen by their primary care physician, and 17.3% were seen by a cardiologist within 30 days. Patients who had medical comorbidities and cardiac conditions such as myocardial infarction or heart failure were less likely to have follow-up. In contrast, a previous visit to a primary care physician was associated with the highest odds of having physician follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 6.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.91-7.01). Similarly, a previous visit to a cardiologist was strongly associated with follow-up by a cardiologist (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.85-3.17). Patients evaluated in emergency departments with the highest tertile of chest pain volume were more likely to receive follow-up from any physician (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.77) and from a cardiologist (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.61-2.57).
INTERPRETATION: Nonclinical factors are strongly associated with physician follow-up for patients with chest pain after discharge from the emergency department. However, patients with comorbidities and at higher risk for future adverse events are less likely to receive follow-up care.
© 2015 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25712950      PMCID: PMC4361126          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  17 in total

1.  Scheduled follow-up after a pediatric emergency department visit for asthma: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joseph J Zorc; Richard J Scarfone; Yuelin Li; Travis Hong; Melina Harmelin; Lev Grunstein; Jalal B Andre
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Quality measurement in the emergency department: past and future.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Renee Y Hsia; Helen Burstin; Michael J Schull; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Association between physician follow-up and outcomes of care after chest pain assessment in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Andrew Czarnecki; Alice Chong; Douglas S Lee; Michael J Schull; Jack V Tu; Ching Lau; Michael E Farkouh; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Use of postal codes and addresses in the analysis of health data.

Authors:  R Wilkins
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.796

5.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists.

Authors:  E L Hannan; M Racz; T J Ryan; B D McCallister; L W Johnson; D T Arani; A D Guerci; J Sosa; E J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm.

Authors:  Janet E Hux; Frank Ivis; Virginia Flintoft; Adina Bica
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Improved outcomes with early collaborative care of ambulatory heart failure patients discharged from the emergency department.

Authors:  Douglas S Lee; Thérèse A Stukel; Peter C Austin; David A Alter; Michael J Schull; John J You; Alice Chong; David Henry; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Emergency department crowding and thrombolysis delays in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael J Schull; Marian Vermeulen; Graham Slaughter; Laurie Morrison; Paul Daly
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Muhammad Mamdani; David A Alter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Randomized controlled trial of emergency department interventions to improve primary care follow-up for patients with acute asthma.

Authors:  Jill M Baren; Edwin D Boudreaux; Barry E Brenner; Rita K Cydulka; Brian H Rowe; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  9 in total

1.  Social equity in health care.

Authors:  Thomas D Brothers; Matthew J To; Colin Van Zoost; Jeffrey Turnbull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Shared Decision-Making as the Future of Emergency Cardiology.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Peter A Noseworthy; Juan P Brito; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: Predictors of deferred intervention and treatment choice.

Authors:  Rashid K Sayyid; Laurence Klotz; John Z Benton; Merry Ma; Phillip Woodruff; Raj Satkunasivam; Martha K Terris; Christopher J D Wallis; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Multimorbidity and Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Panagioti; Jonathan Stokes; Aneez Esmail; Peter Coventry; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Rahul Alam; Peter Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Volume Matters: Improved Outcomes for Patients Presenting to High-Volume Emergency Departments with Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation.

Authors:  Rhonda J Rosychuk; Michelle M Graham; Brian R Holroyd; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of Social Determinants of Health, Health Literacy, Self-perceived Risk, and Trust in the Emergency Physician on Compliance with Follow-up.

Authors:  James Sutton; Leon Gu; Deborah B Diercks
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-05

7.  The impact of telephone follow up on adverse events for Aboriginal people with chronic disease in new South Wales, Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda Jayakody; Erin Passmore; Christopher Oldmeadow; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Eunice Simons; Aaron Cashmore; Louise Maher; Kiel Hennessey; Jacinta Bunfield; Maurice Terare; Andrew Milat; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-05-18

8.  Factors Associated with Family Physician Follow-up 30 Days Post-discharge from a Local Canadian Community Emergency Department.

Authors:  Kelly Lien; Barrett A Grattan; Alexandra L Reynard; Jocelynn Peters; Jennifer L Parr
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-16

9.  Risk Stratification for Patients with Chest Pain Discharged Home from the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Peter A Kavsak; Joshua O Cerasuolo; Shawn E Mondoux; Jonathan Sherbino; Jinhui Ma; Brock K Hoard; Richard Perez; Hsien Seow; Dennis T Ko; Andrew Worster
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.