| Literature DB >> 34463172 |
Cheng Deng1,2, Qiaofeng Jin1,2, Ya Wu1,2, Huiling Li1,2, Luyang Yi1,2, Yihan Chen1,2, Tang Gao1,2, Wenyuan Wang1,2, Jing Wang1,2, Qing Lv1,2, Yali Yang1,2, Jia Xu1,2, Wenpei Fu1,2, Li Zhang1,2, Mingxing Xie1,2.
Abstract
FK506, a first-line immunosuppressant, is routinely administered orally and intravenously to inhibit activation and proliferation of T cells after heart transplantation (HT). Current administration route is not conducive enough to exert its efficacy in lymphatic system. Herein, we proposed that subcutaneous (SC) administration of FK506-loaded nanoparticles (PLGA-FK506-NPs) would be valuable for treating acute rejection after HT. The biodistribution and pharmacokinetic study revealed that it could effectively deliver FK506 to the lymph nodes (LNs) due to their suitable particle size, especially in inguinal LNs. Subsequently, the therapeutic efficacy of PLGA-FK506-NPs on the HT model was evaluated using intravenous (IV), intragastric (IG), or SC injection. Histopathological analysis revealed that 80% of allografts exhibited only grade 1R rejection with negligible lymphocyte infiltration in the SC group. The IV group exhibited 40% 1R rejection with mild lymphocyte infiltration and 20% grade 3R that require further intervention, and the IG group exhibited grades 40% 3R rejection with more lymphocyte infiltration. Moreover, the infiltration of T cells and the secretion of IL-2 and IFN-γ were significantly reduced in the SC group compared with the IG or IV group. The mean survival time (MST) further revealed that 50% of grafts treated with PLGA-FK506-NPs via SC injection survived longer than IG and IV groups. Moreover, the MST of single-dose SC injection of PLGA-FK506-NPs demonstrated that it would effectively reduce the required dose for a similar therapeutic effect. Overall, these results indicate that SC administration of PLGA-FK506-NPs is a more effective route for chronic FK506 treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Heart transplantation; acute rejection; administration route; nanoparticles; subcutaneous drug delivery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34463172 PMCID: PMC8409942 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1968978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.Characterization of PLGA-FK506-NPs. (A) Redispersibility of PLGA-FK506-NPs in PBS. (B) SEM and (C) TEM images of PLGA-FK506-NPs. (D) Size distribution and morphology. (E) FTIR spectra of PLGA, FK506, and PLGA-FK506-NPs. (F) In vitro release profile of PLGA-FK506-NPs in PBS at pH 7.4.
Figure 2.Biodistribution of DiR-labeled PLGA-NPs following various administration routes. (A) Ex vivo fluorescence image of major organs. (B) Quantitative analysis of NPs in major organs and LNs. MLNs: mesenteric lymph nodes; ILNs: inguinal lymph nodes; ALNs: axillary lymph nodes. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6).
Figure 3.Blood concentration profiles of FK506 in normal rats after different administration of the PLGA-FK506-NPs. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of FK506 after injection of PLGA-FK506-NPs in different administration routes.
| Parameters | IG | IV | SC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 164.93 ± 13.40 | 323.76 ± 10.31 | 186.14 ± 47.29 | |
| 1 | 0.25 | 1 | |
|
| 0.61 ± 0.40 | 0. 36 ± 0.09 | 1.2 ± 0.91 |
|
| 7.11 ± 2.14 | 4.35 ± 1.16 | 6.92 ± 2.02 |
| AUC0– | 861.23 ± 232.15 | 1058.90 ± 225.98 | 920.95 ± 127.91 |
| MRT0– | 6.81 ± 1.54 | 5.32 ± 0.66 | 6.08 ± 1.34 |
Cmax: peak concentration; Tmax: peak time; t1/2α: distribution half-life; t1/2β: elimination half-life; AUC0–: area under the whole blood concentration–time curve; MRT: mean residence time.
Figure 4.Lymphatic organs concentration profiles of FK506 in normal rats after different administration of the PLGA-FK506-NPs at 24 h. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 4). *p< .05, ***p< .001.
Figure 5.Histological and immunohistochemistry analysis of PLGA-FK506-NPs treatment via various administration on POD 7. (A) H&E staining of the tissue sections. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Immunohistochemistry staining with CD3+ T lymphocytes. Scale bar = 20 μm. Areas in black dotted lines indicate the areas of lymphocyte infiltration and myocyte damage.
Graft rejection grades in the groups after seven days.
| Groups | Acute rejection grades | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0R | 1R | 2R | 3R | |
| PBS | 1 | 4 | ||
| IG | 3 | 2 | ||
| IV | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| SC | 4 | 1 | ||
| ISO | 5 | |||
Figure 6.(A) Immunofluorescence staining of IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-6 secretion in allografts or isograft. (B) Quantification analysis of fluorescence images. Scale bar = 50 μm. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). *p< 05, **p< .01, ***p< .001.
Figure 7.Kaplan–Meier’s survival curve of cardiac allograft treated with PLGA-FK506-NPs with different administration routes (A) and different doses via SC injection (B).
Graft survival time of heterotopic abdominal cardiac transplantation rats treated with different routes of administration.
| Groups |
| Mean survival time (days) |
|---|---|---|
| PBS | 6 | 7 |
| IG | 5 | 16.2 |
| IV | 6 | 17 |
| SC | 6 | >26.8 |
| ISO | 4 | >28 |
Administered doses of FK506 were 1 mg/kg, five times. Graft survival time plotted at >28 means that the graft survived more than 28 days.
p< .05 vs. PBS.
p< .01 vs. PBS, IG, IV.
p< .05 vs. PBS, IG, IV.
Graft survival time of heterotopic abdominal cardiac transplantation rats treated with subcutaneous administration.
| Group | Dose |
| Mean survival time (days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 1 mg/kg once | 7 | 8.7 |
| II | 2 mg/kg once | 4 | 19.2 |
| III | 3 mg/kg once | 5 | >23.2 |