Literature DB >> 34457922

Is Augmented Reality the New Way for Teaching and Learning Veterinary Cardiac Anatomy?

W Brady Little1, Cristian Dezdrobitu1, Anne Conan1, Elpida Artemiou1.   

Abstract

Strong understanding of cardiac anatomy and function are essential components of veterinary medical education; however, the heart is considered challenging to comprehend due to its complexity. This study introduced and assessed a new learning resource, the IVALA® augmented reality (AR) heart program in a cohort of pre-veterinary students. Students were randomly divided into traditional textbook learning and AR learning groups. All students underwent a pre- and post-intervention testing assessing baseline cardiac anatomy knowledge, as well as pre-intervention evaluation of inherent spatial awareness. Teaching and learning included a 60-min cadaveric learning experience guided by either traditional learning resources or the IVALA® program. All students completed a participant survey about their learning experiences. Seventy-four students (36 in the control, and 38 in the IVALA® group) participated in the research. Overall, students improved in cardiac knowledge by an average of 24.5% after intervention regardless of study methodology. No significant difference in post-test improvement was noted between the two groups. On a 20-question assessment, students in the IVALA® group improved by an average of 4.9 questions correct over their pre-intervention test, and the control group improved by an average of 4.8 questions (p = 0.9). A positive correlation was found between spatial awareness scores and post-test improvement regardless of cohort group (p = 0.03). Sixty-two individuals (83.8%) completing the participant survey reported an overwhelming preference for learning with AR compared to traditional methods. This study illustrates student preference of IVALA® program in learning anatomy of the heart and supports its use is as effective as traditional methods of teaching with the benefit of increased enthusiasm and engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01260-8. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Augmented reality; Cardiac; Education; Teaching; Veterinary

Year:  2021        PMID: 34457922      PMCID: PMC8368292          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01260-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  45 in total

1.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers.

Authors:  John C McLachlan; John Bligh; Paul Bradley; Judy Searle
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students.

Authors:  Jane Kerby; Zena N Shukur; Joseph Shalhoub
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students.

Authors:  S W Waterston; I J Stewart
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Spatial abilities in an elective course of applied anatomy after a problem-based learning curriculum.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; George A Wells; Marc Lecourtois; Germain Bergeron; Elizabeth Yetisir; Marcel Martin
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.

Authors:  Christopher R Davis; Anthony S Bates; Harold Ellis; Alice M Roberts
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy--the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource.

Authors:  B H Fruhstorfer; J Palmer; S Brydges; P H Abrahams
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Virtual reality anatomy: is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy?

Authors:  Anthony M Codd; Bipasha Choudhury
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.

Authors:  Mohamed Estai; Stuart Bunt
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomy.

Authors:  Ruth Fernandez; Itiel E Dror; Claire Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Stéphane Champely; Christophe Batier; Patrice Thiriet; Christian Collet
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.