Literature DB >> 26996541

Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.

Mohamed Estai1, Stuart Bunt2.   

Abstract

In this report we review the range of teaching resources and strategies used in anatomy education with the aim of coming up with suggestions about the best teaching practices in this area. There is much debate about suitable methods of delivering anatomical knowledge. Competent clinicians, particularly surgeons, need a deep understanding of anatomy for safe clinical procedures. However, because students have had very limited exposure to anatomy during clinical training, there is a concern that medical students are ill-prepared in anatomy when entering clerkships and residency programs. Therefore, developing effective modalities for teaching anatomy is essential to safe medical practice. Cadaver-based instruction has survived as the main instructional tool for hundreds of years, however, there are differing views on whether full cadaver dissection is still appropriate for a modern undergraduate training. The limitations on curricular time, trained anatomy faculty and resources for gross anatomy courses in integrated or/and system-based curricula, have led many medical schools to abandon costly and time-consuming dissection-based instruction in favour of alternative methods of instruction including prosection, medical imaging, living anatomy and multimedia resources. To date, no single teaching tool has been found to meet curriculum requirements. The best way to teach modern anatomy is by combining multiple pedagogical resources to complement one another, students appear to learn more effectively when multimodal and system-based approaches are integrated. Our review suggests that certain professions would have more benefit from certain educational methods or strategies than others. Full body dissection would be best reserved for medical students, especially those with surgical career intentions, while teaching based on prosections and plastination is more suitable for dental, pharmacy and allied health science students. There is a need to direct future research towards evaluation of the suitability of the new teaching methodologies in new curricula and student perceptions of integrated and multimodal teaching paradigms, and the ability of these to satisfy learning outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anatomy; Curriculum; Education; Learning; Modality; Teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26996541     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  86 in total

1.  The influence of online review videos on gross anatomy course performance among doctor of chiropractic students.

Authors:  Nicole M Zipay; Christopher B Roecker; Dustin C Derby; Lia M Nightingale
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 2.  Outcomes of the use of plastination in anatomy education: current evidence.

Authors:  Dimitrios Chytas; Maria Piagkou; Elizabeth O Johnson; George Tsakotos; Antonios Mazarakis; George C Babis; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Maria-Kyriaki Kaseta; Konstantinos Natsis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls.

Authors:  Wee Sim Khor; Benjamin Baker; Kavit Amin; Adrian Chan; Ketan Patel; Jason Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  Analysis of immediate student outcomes following a change in gross anatomy laboratory teaching methodology.

Authors:  Salman Afsharpour; Abigail Gonsalves; Ronald Hosek; Eric Partin
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2018-04-24

5.  Contrast-enhanced cadaver-specific computed tomography in gross anatomy teaching.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Kerstin Klopries; Sara Doll; Ralph Nawrotzki; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Frederik L Giesel; Thomas Kuner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  3D Models of Female Pelvis Structures Reconstructed and Represented in Combination with Anatomical and Radiological Sections.

Authors:  L Asensio Romero; M Asensio Gómez; A Prats-Galino; J A Juanes Méndez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  [Interactive augmented reality systems : Aid for personalized patient education and rehabilitation].

Authors:  F Bork
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  The Various Applications of 3D Printing in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Abdallah El Sabbagh; Mackram F Eleid; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Nandan S Anavekar; David R Holmes; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Gustavo S Oderich; Stephen D Cassivi; Sameh M Said; Charanjit S Rihal; Jane M Matsumoto; Thomas A Foley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Is a Three-Dimensional Printing Model Better Than a Traditional Cardiac Model for Medical Education? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Zhongmin Wang; Yuhao Liu; Hongxing Luo; Chuanyu Gao; Jing Zhang; Yuya Dai
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  Producing three-dimensional printed models of the hepatobiliary system from computed tomography imaging data.

Authors:  R W Smillie; M A Williams; M Richard; T Cosker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.