Literature DB >> 34457921

Are Clerks Proficient in the Basic Sciences? Assessment of Third-Year Medical Students' Basic Science Knowledge Prior to and at the Completion of Core Clerkship Rotations.

Madeleine E Norris1, Mark A Cachia1, Marjorie I Johnson1, Charys M Martin1, Kem A Rogers1.   

Abstract

Basic sciences are a cornerstone of undergraduate medical education (UME), yet research indicates that students' basic science knowledge is not well retained. Many UME curricula are increasing the integration between the basic and clinical sciences with the goal of enhancing students' knowledge levels; however, the impact of clerkship training on students' basic science knowledge remains inconclusive. Thus, using clerkship directors' expectations as framework, we aimed to assess third-year medical students' basic science knowledge during clerkship training and evaluate the influence of clerkship training on their basic science knowledge. Using concepts deemed necessary by clerkship directors, we created a basic science assessment for each clerkship rotation. Assessments were distributed to third-year medical students as a pre- and post-test to assess their basic science knowledge prior to and at the completion of each rotation. On average, students retained ≥ 60% of relevant basic science knowledge from pre-clerkship, and neither clerkship rotation order, nor the basic science discipline being assessed, impacted students' basic science knowledge levels. Post-test data revealed that students, on average, reinforced fundamental concepts during clerkship. Interestingly, even though lower-performing students demonstrated the greatest post-test improvement, they still left each rotation with knowledge deficits compared with their highest-performing peers, suggesting that the clinical experience of clerkship appears to be particularly beneficial for lower-performing students, in regard to enhancing their basic science knowledge. Overall, results indicate that earlier exposure to clinical learning in UME, along with integration of basic science education into clerkship, could promote students' basic science knowledge acquisition and retention. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic science education; Basic science knowledge reinforcement; Basic science knowledge retention; Undergraduate medical education

Year:  2021        PMID: 34457921      PMCID: PMC8368550          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01249-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  58 in total

1.  The Scottish doctor--learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners.

Authors:  J G Simpson; J Furnace; J Crosby; A D Cumming; P A Evans; M Friedman Ben David; R M Harden; D Lloyd; H McKenzie; J C McLachlan; G F McPhate; I W Percy-Robb; S G MacPherson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  The requirement for bioscience knowledge in medical education.

Authors:  Geoffrey J McColl; Justin Bilszta; Stephen Harrap
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Do prior knowledge, personality and visual perceptual ability predict student performance in microscopic pathology?

Authors:  Laura Helle; Markus Nivala; Pauliina Kronqvist; K Anders Ericsson; Erno Lehtinen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Relationship of rotation timing to pattern of clerkship performance in psychiatry.

Authors:  Robin S Park; John T Chibnall; Andrew Morrow
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

5.  Medical education reimagined: a call to action.

Authors:  Charles G Prober; Salman Khan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Retention of basic science information by fourth-year medical students.

Authors:  D B Swanson; S M Case; R M Luecht; G F Dillon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  H Carrie Chen; W E Sjoukje van den Broek; Olle ten Cate
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96.

Authors:  David G Brauer; Kristi J Ferguson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 9.  Can new doctors be prepared for practice? A review.

Authors:  Cameron Alexander; Alexander Cameron; James Millar; Natasha Szmidt; Katie Hanlon; Jennifer Cleland
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2014-06

10.  Reflections on competency-based education and training for surgical residents.

Authors:  Ranil R Sonnadara; Carween Mui; Sydney McQueen; Polina Mironova; Markku Nousiainen; Oleg Safir; William Kraemer; Peter Ferguson; Benjamin Alman; Richard Reznick
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.