Literature DB >> 34457917

A Tool for Evaluating Session-Level Integration in Medical Education.

Amber J Heck1, Amanda J Chase2.   

Abstract

Integration in medical education is generally defined as a multidisciplinary approach to the delivery of the basic and applied sciences. In medical education, the number of integrated curricula reported has steadily increased, yet the degree of integration often varies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a tool for medical educators to assess and improve the level of trans-disciplinary integration within an individual academic session. The Session Integration Tool (SIT) is an analytic, developmental rubric that allows the user to assess session-level integration given three criteria: development, delivery, and outcomes. To evaluate the tool, participants utilized the SIT to assess two exemplar case studies, and then their own educational session. A survey was administered to assess user satisfaction along with the instrument's usefulness and impact on practice. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant difference between user scores of the exemplar case studies for each paired set of criteria (p < 0.000) and for total scores (p = 0.043). Users also successfully used the instrument to assess their own session. The SIT was highly rated by users in terms of satisfaction, usefulness, and impact on practice, with average scores for each category ranging from agree to strongly agree. The SIT has statistical validity in its ability to discriminate between varied levels of integration. Users found the SIT to be useful and impactful for medical education practice and believe it to support peer- and self-assessment of curricular integration. The SIT is a useful, evidence-based, theory grounded tool for assessing session-level integration. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum development; Faculty development; Integration; Rubric; Session-level integration

Year:  2021        PMID: 34457917      PMCID: PMC8368370          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01241-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  8 in total

1.  The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation.

Authors:  R M Harden
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy.

Authors:  Ellen Goldman; W Scott Schroth
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning.

Authors:  Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram; Maria Athina Martimianakis; Maria Mylopoulos; Cynthia R Whitehead; Nicole N Woods
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education.

Authors:  Edward P Finnerty; Sheila Chauvin; Giulia Bonaminio; Mark Andrews; Robert G Carroll; Louis N Pangaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96.

Authors:  David G Brauer; Kristi J Ferguson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86.

Authors:  John Q Young; Jeroen Van Merrienboer; Steve Durning; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  The McMaster M.D. program: a case study of renewal in medical education.

Authors:  V R Neufeld; C A Woodward; S M MacLeod
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model.

Authors:  R M Harden; S Sowden; W R Dunn
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.