Literature DB >> 22534596

Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy.

Ellen Goldman1, W Scott Schroth.   

Abstract

In response to historical criticism, evolving accreditation standards, and recent reports on curricula, medical educators and medical schools have been eagerly pursuing integration as a goal of curricular reform. The general education literature broadly considers integration to be the deliberate unification of separate areas of knowledge, and it provides support for the concept that integration better meets the needs of adult learners in professional education. The use of integration as a curricular goal is not without its critics, however, nor is it free of difficulties in implementation. In this perspective, the authors propose that most of these difficulties arise from a failure to recognize that integration is a strategy for curricular development rather than a goal in itself, and they argue that adopting a systematic approach to integration offers many potential benefits. They articulate the conceptual and practical issues that they believe are critical to consider in order to achieve successful curricular integration, and they suggest that integration should be approached as a subset of broader curriculum development decisions. They propose a three-level framework for applying integration as a guiding curricular strategy, in which decisions about integration must follow curricular decisions made at the program level, the course level, and then the individual session level.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534596     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cad4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  17 in total

1.  Legitimizing Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): Navigating Rationality in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Terry D Stratton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Integration of Basic and Clinical Science Courses in US PharmD Programs.

Authors:  Mohammed A Islam; Rahmat M Talukder; Reza Taheri; Nicholas Blanchard
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Curricular Reform in Pharmacy Education Through the Lens of the Flexner Report of 1910.

Authors:  Ryan L Crass; Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Faculty reflections on the process of building an integrated preclerkship curriculum: a new school perspective.

Authors:  Mohammed K Khalil; Jonathan D Kibble
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Survey of Pharmacy Schools' Approaches and Attitudes toward Curricular Integration.

Authors:  Therese I Poirier; Jingyang Fan; Marcelo J Nieto
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  A Tool for Evaluating Session-Level Integration in Medical Education.

Authors:  Amber J Heck; Amanda J Chase
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-04-02

7.  Precision Cancer Medicine: Dynamic Learning of Cancer Biology in a Clinically Meaningful Context.

Authors:  Xuanyi Li; Kaustav P Shah; Catherine Zivanov; Lourdes Estrada; William B Cutrer; Mary Hooks; Vicki Keedy; Kimberly Brown Dahlman
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-04-02

8.  Extending the theoretical framework for curriculum integration in pre-clinical medical education.

Authors:  John Vergel; Diana Stentoft; Juny Montoya
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-08

9.  Integrating Foundational Sciences in a Clinical Context in the Post-Clerkship Curriculum.

Authors:  Kimberly Brown Dahlman; Matthew B Weinger; Kimberly D Lomis; Lillian Nanney; Neil Osheroff; Donald E Moore; Lourdes Estrada; William B Cutrer
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2018-01-02

10.  Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sophie Eisenbarth; Thomas Tilling; Eva Lueerss; Jelka Meyer; Susanne Sehner; Andreas H Guse; Jennifer Guse Nee Kurré
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.