Literature DB >> 34457866

A Novel USMLE Step 1 Projection Model Using a Single Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment Taken During a Brief Intense Study Period.

Stephen D Bigach1,2, Robert D Winkelman2, Jonathan C Savakus2,3, Klara K Papp2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessments (CBSSAs) offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) are used by students to gauge preparedness for the United States Medical Licensing (USMLE) Step 1. Because residency programs value Step 1 scores, students expend many resources attempting to score highly on this exam. We sought to generate a predicted Step 1 score from a single CBSSA taken several days out from a planned exam date to inform student testing and study plans.
METHODS: 2016 and 2017 Step 1 test takers at one US medical school were surveyed. The average daily score improvement from CBSSA to Step 1 during the 2016 study period was calculated and used to generate a predicted Step 1 score as well as mean absolute prediction errors (MAPEs). The predictive model was validated on 2017 data.
RESULTS: In total, 43 of 61 respondents totaling 141 CBSSAs in 2016 and 37 of 43 respondents totaling 122 CBSSAs in 2017 were included. The final prediction model was [Predicted Step 1 = 292 - (292 - CBSSA score) * 0.987527 ^ (number of days out)]. In 2016, the average difference between predicted and actual scores was -0.81 (10.2) and the MAPE was 7.8. In 2017, 88 (72.1%) and 118 (96.7%) of true Step 1 scores fell within one and two standard deviations of a student's predicted score. There was a MAPE of 7.7. Practice form used (p = 0.19, 0.07) and how far out from actual Step 1 it was taken (p = 0.82, 0.38) were not significant in either year of study.
CONCLUSION: This projection model is reasonable for students to use to gauge their readiness for Step 1 while it remains a scored exam and provides a framework for future predictive model generation as the landscape of standardized testing changes in medical education. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Projection modeling; Step 1; Testing; USMLE

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457866      PMCID: PMC8368818          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01097-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  13 in total

1.  A preliminary analysis of different approaches to preparing for the USMLE step 1.

Authors:  R A Thadani; D B Swanson; R M Galbraith
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Using the NBME self-assessments to project performance on USMLE Step 1 and Step 2: impact of test administration conditions.

Authors:  Amy Sawhill; Aggie Butler; Douglas Ripkey; David B Swanson; Raja Subhiyah; John Thelman; William Walsh; Kathleen Z Holtzman; Kathy Angelucci
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The predictive value of general surgery application data for future resident performance.

Authors:  Daniel Mark Alterman; Thomas M Jones; Robert E Heidel; Brian J Daley; Mitchell H Goldman
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  A Plea to Reassess the Role of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scores in Residency Selection.

Authors:  Charles G Prober; Joseph C Kolars; Lewis R First; Donald E Melnick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  How we select our residents--a survey of selection criteria in general surgery residents.

Authors:  George Makdisi; Tetsuya Takeuchi; Jennifer Rodriguez; James Rucinski; Leslie Wise
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  A Cross-sectional Analysis of Minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 Criteria Used by Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs in Screening Residency Applications.

Authors:  John B Schrock; Matthew J Kraeutler; Michael R Dayton; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 Scores Predict Neuroradiology Fellowship Success.

Authors:  Ilyssa J Yousem; Li Liu; Nafi Aygun; David M Yousem
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Study Behaviors and USMLE Step 1 Performance: Implications of a Student Self-Directed Parallel Curriculum.

Authors:  Jesse Burk-Rafel; Sally A Santen; Joel Purkiss
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Use of NBME and USMLE examinations to evaluate medical education programs.

Authors:  R G Williams
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  A Predictive Model for USMLE Step 1 Scores.

Authors:  Christin Giordano; David Hutchinson; Richard Peppler
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.