Literature DB >> 34457725

The Inability to Calculate Predictive Values: an Old Problem that Has Not Gone Away.

Steven D Stovitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that many physicians and medical trainees have trouble calculating the probability that a patient has a condition, also known as the predictive value. ACTIVITY: Two questions from the medical literature were administered to medical students, residents (post-medical school), fellows (post-residency), and faculty physicians.
RESULTS: Only 6% answered both questions correctly. Most commonly, the participants grossly overestimated the probability of disease. DISCUSSION: Physicians still struggle with the ability to calculate predictive values, a skill that affects all branches of medicine and will become more consequential as new tests are administered to patients at low risk for disease. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical education; Predictive values; Replication

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457725      PMCID: PMC8368592          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-00954-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  13 in total

1.  How do individuals apply risk information when choosing among health care interventions?

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Jørgen Nexøe; Jesper Bo Nielsen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  Vivianne H M Visschers; Ree M Meertens; Wim W F Passchier; Nanne N K de Vries
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Communication in acute ambulatory care.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; John Oetzel; David P Sklar
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

5.  Shared decision making: Physicians' preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components.

Authors:  Ellen M Driever; Anne M Stiggelbout; Paul L P Brand
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-08-12

6.  Shared decision making requires statistical literacy.

Authors:  Chandra Y Osborn
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2009-04-01

7.  Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results.

Authors:  W Casscells; A Schoenberger; T B Graboys
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; A H Pieterse; J C J M De Haes
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-15

9.  Statistical illiteracy undermines informed shared decision making.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2008

Review 10.  Communicating evidence for participatory decision making.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Brian S Alper; Timothy E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.