Literature DB >> 34457665

Influence of Student Feedback on the Quality of Teaching among Clinical Teachers in Bahrain.

Ahmed Al Ansari1,2, Kathryn Strachan1, Shaima Al Balooshi1, Amal Al-Qallaf1, Sameer Otoom1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of student feedback on teaching quality has been well-documented. However, only a few studies have examined the impact of feedback on clinical teachers delivering cross-border medical education in this geographical region. The aim of this study is to investigate (i) the quality of teaching among clinical teachers in a cross-border medical education setup, (ii) the impact of student feedback on teaching effectiveness, (iii) the differences in ratings among different groups of students, and (iv) factors that improve clinical teaching.
METHODS: Fifty-seven clinical teachers and 140 students participated in this study. Teachers received feedback on their performance and were allowed to reflect on them. Six months later, the teachers received feedback again. Additionally, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 5 selected clinical teachers working in 2 different hospitals to explore the factors that influenced clinical teaching. RESULT: Overall, nearly half of the clinical teachers (n = 25) showed a trend of greater scores in the second assessment, while most of the remaining teachers (n = 24) continued to have more or less the same score or marginal fall in the second assessment. Even though few clinical teachers demonstrated significantly lesser scores, careful observation of data showed that the mean value of the second score either remained above (n = 5) or closer (n = 2) to the cut-off value of 3.74, except one teacher who recorded the least mean score of 3.17 in the second assessment. In qualitative analysis, teachers emphasised that the student feedback allowed them to develop more effective teaching approaches and strategies.
CONCLUSION: The pattern of results suggests that the effect of student feedback on teaching quality can have multiple outcomes, mostly positive or neutral, and very rarely negative. This study also advocates that feedback can be more beneficial if strengthened by other interventions like faculty training. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical education; Feedback; Mixed method; Teaching quality; mSETQ

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457665      PMCID: PMC8368718          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00892-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  16 in total

1.  Expanding the horizon for feedback.

Authors:  Sharon K Krackov
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Sharon K Krackov
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  Feedback: an essential element of student learning in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mary P Clynes; Sara E C Raftery
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.281

4.  Transformative learning and research utilization in nursing practice: a missing link?

Authors:  Nancy Matthew-Maich; Jenny Ploeg; Susan Jack; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  The Implication of Using NVivo Software in Qualitative Data Analysis: Evidence-Based Reflections.

Authors:  F C Zamawe
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.875

6.  Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  K M Skeff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships.

Authors:  Harold G J Bok; Pim W Teunissen; Annemarie Spruijt; Joanne P I Fokkema; Peter van Beukelen; Debbie A D C Jaarsma; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Ansari; Kathryn Strachan; Sumaya Hashim; Sameer Otoom
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Student feedback experiences in a cross-border medical education curriculum.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Nawal BenSmail; Sanjida Ahkter
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-05-24

10.  Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers.

Authors:  Renée E Stalmeijer; Diana H J M Dolmans; Ineke H A P Wolfhagen; Wim G Peters; Lieve van Coppenolle; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.