Literature DB >> 34457357

Rapid and sustained decline in CXCL-10 (IP-10) annotates clinical outcomes following TNFα-antagonist therapy in hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19 respiratory failure.

Hilal Hachem1,2, Amandeep Godara1,3, Courtney Schroeder1, Daniel Fein1, Hashim Mann1, Christian Lawlor1, Jill Marshall1, Andreas Klein1, Debra Poutsiaka4, Janis L Breeze5, Raghav Joshi1, Paul Mathew1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A feedforward pathological signaling loop generated by TNFα and IFN-γ synergy in the inflamed lung, driving CXCL-10 (IP-10) and CXCL-9 chemokine-mediated activated T-cell and monocyte/macrophage tissue recruitment, may define the inflammatory biology of lethal COVID-19 respiratory failure.
METHODS: To assess TNFα-antagonist therapy, 18 hospitalized adults with hypoxic respiratory failure and COVID-19 pneumonia received single-dose infliximab-abda therapy 5 mg/kg intravenously between April and December 2020. The primary endpoint was time to increase in oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SpO2/FiO2) by ≥50 compared to baseline and sustained for 48 h. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality, dynamic cytokine profiles, secondary infections, duration of supplemental oxygen support, and hospitalization.
FINDINGS: Patients were predominantly in critical respiratory failure (15/18, 83%), male (14/18, 78%), above 60 years (median 63 years, range 31-80), race-ethnic minorities (13/18, 72%), lymphopenic (13/18, 72%), steroid-treated (17/18, 94%), with a median ferritin of 1953 ng/ml. Sixteen patients (89%) met the primary endpoint within a median of 4 days; 14/18 (78%) were discharged in a median of 8 days and were alive at 28-day follow-up. Three deaths were attributed to secondary lung infection. Mean plasma IP-10 levels declined sharply from 9183 to 483 pg/ml at Day 3 and 146 pg/ml at Day 14/discharge. Significant Day 3 declines in IFN-, TNFα, IL-27, CRP, and ferritin occurred. IP-10 and CXCL-9 declines were strongly correlated among patients with lymphopenia reversal (Day 3, Pearson r: 0.98, P-value 0.0006).
INTERPRETATION: Infliximab-abda may rapidly abrogate pathological inflammatory signaling to facilitate clinical recovery in severe and critical COVID-19. © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; CXCL-10; IP-10; TNFα; infliximababda; respiratory failure

Year:  2021        PMID: 34457357      PMCID: PMC8376916          DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 2059-8661


Introduction

Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that TNFα may fundamentally orchestrate the hyperinflammatory cytokine signature and adverse disease course of COVID-19 [1,2]. Elevated circulating levels of TNFα and its known regulatory targets including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and ferritin have been correlated with indices of disease severity, including intensive care needs, multisystem organ failure, and death [3-5]. A marked quantitative reduction in lymphocytes and natural killer cells in severe COVID-19 illness is accompanied by markers of immune exhaustion, which are inversely associated with levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα [6]. An aberrant hyperimmune response triggered by the synergy between TNFα and IFN-γ may underpin the markedly elevated T-cell chemokines CXCL-10 (IP-10) and CXCL-9, associated with immune exhaustion and adverse clinical outcomes [1,7,8]. TNFα has been previously implicated as a master regulator of immune exhaustion in other biological contexts [9]. In preclinical animal models of H1N1 influenza and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection, anti-TNFα monotherapy resolved inflammation, restored immune surveillance, suppressed or cleared viral infection, and prolonged survival [9,10]. Based on the hypothesis that TNFα-antagonists may abrogate the adverse inflammatory cytokine profile of COVID-19 disease and reduce the need for advanced cardiorespiratory support, a pilot study of the infliximab biosimilar, infliximab-abda, was initiated in COVID-19 respiratory failure (NCT04425538). The goal of the study was to generate early efficacy, toxicity, and cytokine correlative data to inform the next generation of studies.

Methods

Patients (Fig. 1): Eligible subjects were at least 18 years old, could provide informed consent, had pneumonia evidenced by chest X-ray or computerized tomography, and laboratory (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) confirmed infection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with at least one of the following: respiratory frequency ≥30/min, blood oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air, partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) < 300, worsening of lung involvement defined as an increase in number and/or extension of pulmonary areas of consolidation, need for increased FiO2 to maintain stable oxygen saturation, or worsening oxygen saturation of >3% with stable FiO2. These represent patients with both severe and critical COVID-19 illness as defined by the Food and Drug Administration (https://www.fda.gov/media/137926/download; Appendix A). Exclusion criteria included treatment with any TNFα inhibitor in the past 30 days, absolute neutrophil count less than 1000 mm3, hemoglobin < 7.0 g/L, platelets < 50,000 per mm3, or aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase greater than five times the upper limit of normal, known active or latent hepatitis B, known or suspected active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of incompletely treated or latent TB, pregnancy, uncontrolled systemic bacterial or fungal infections (prior positive bacterial or fungal cultures on appropriate therapy with negative repeat cultures was permissible), myocardial infarction (within last month), moderate or severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), acute stroke (within last month), uncontrolled malignancy, Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) at baseline. Prior and concurrent remdesivir, dexamethasone, and convalescent plasma therapy were permitted. No limits to the level and duration of oxygenation support or hospitalization were specified. Infliximab-abda therapy was sanctioned as part of a COVID-19 care pathway for hospitalized patients by an institutional task force and by infectious disease and critical care medicine consultation for each patient. Patients who were judged to be improving on standard therapy or suspected to have active concomitant infection were not sanctioned for study consideration.
Fig. 1.

Consort diagram. Hospitalized patients with SARS-COV2 infection and pneumonia were referred to the infliximab-abda study team for evaluation.

Consort diagram. Hospitalized patients with SARS-COV2 infection and pneumonia were referred to the infliximab-abda study team for evaluation.

Therapy

Treatment with infliximab-abda 5 mg/kg IV was planned within 6 h of enrollment, and no more than 24 h following enrollment. Premedication with acetaminophen 650 mg once, 30 min prior to infusion, was recommended. Retreatment with infliximab-abda was permitted at the treating physician’s discretion 7–21 days following primary therapy. One patient (TMC-Pre) who met the eligibility criteria and was treated on the care pathway prior to the formal activation of the pilot study was included in the analysis and reporting. The choice of TNFα-antagonist for the study was based on availability, cost, rapid onset of action when delivered parenterally, potency, and a relatively short half-life (7–10 days for infliximab-abda, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761054orig1s000lbl.pdf) [11,12].

Laboratory Studies

Included complete blood counts and leucocyte differential, complete metabolic panels which included electrolytes, creatinine, and liver function tests, inflammatory markers including serum ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) and a panel of cytokines performed at baseline prior to infliximab-abda (Day 1) in all enrolled patients and on Days 3 and 14 or discharge if earlier. Luminex xMAP technology was employed for multiplexed quantification of 48 human cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. The multiplexing analysis was performed using the Luminex™ 200 system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) by Eve Technologies Corp. (Calgary, Alberta). Forty-eight markers were simultaneously measured in the samples using Eve Technologies’ Human Cytokine 48-Plex Discovery Assay® (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The 48-plex consisted of sCD40L, EGF, Eotaxin, FGF-2, FLT-3 Ligand, Fractalkine, G-CSF, GM-CSF, GROα, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-12(p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A, IL-17E/IL-25, IL-17F, IL-18, IL-22, IL-27, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-3, M-CSF, MDC, MIG/CXCL9, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, RANTES, TGFα, TNF-α, TNF-β, and VEGF-A. Assay sensitivities of these markers range from 0.14 to 50.78 pg/ml.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the pilot study was time to improvement in oxygenation (increase in oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio SpO2/FiO2 of 50 or greater compared to the baseline SpO2/FiO2) sustained for a minimum of 48 h. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality, assessment of dynamic changes in cytokine and inflammatory profile after therapy, qualitative and quantitative toxicity, incidence and duration of supplementation oxygen support including mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), duration of hospitalization, and frequency and spectrum of secondary infections. COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) diagnoses were annotated by consensus criteria [13]. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to annotate toxicity including infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and unanticipated outcomes in the critical care setting potentially attributable to the study therapy.

Statistics

Mean ferritin, CRP, and cytokine levels on Day 1 and the mean dynamic change on Day 3 and Day 14 were compared using pairwise ratio t-tests (GraphPad Prism). Given the number of comparisons (50 at each timepoint), a 5% false-discovery rate (FDR) was applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg method, and those cytokines that met statistical significance at the adjusted thresholds are also reported. Given that post-steroid therapy IL-6 levels at different cut-off levels have been shown to correlate with adverse outcomes [14,15], the impact of infliximab-abda on IL-6 levels at Day 3 and Day 14 stratified by degree of baseline elevation in the largely steroid-pretreated population was separately analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for fold changes (log2 transformed ratio) in expression from baseline to Day 3 between each pair of cytokines. In all statistical comparisons, values for samples whose cytokine levels were below the assay detection limits were replaced by the sensitivity of the assay for each respective cytokine. Descriptive statistics annotate the remaining endpoints.

Study Approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was received from participants or designees prior to inclusion.

Results

The demographics, comorbidities, clinical features, inflammatory markers, and outcomes of 18 patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure treated with infliximab-abda between April and December 2020 are represented in Table 1. The median age was 63 years (range 31–80), largely male (78%), and race-ethnic minority (Asian, South Asian, Black, Hispanic, or Latino, 72%), with at least one significant medical comorbidity (72%). Comorbidities included hypertension (67%), diabetes (28%), smoking history (22%), or chronic lung disease, including asthma (22%). Half were obese or morbidly obese; the median body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2 (range 18.0–41.8). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.5 (range 0–9). Sixteen patients (89%) had received both remdesivir and steroid therapy (median 2 days, range 0–7 days) with infliximab-abda therapy supported by the infectious disease consultative service. Five patients (28%) received prior convalescent plasma (median 2 days, range 0–4 days). Fifteen patients (83%) were on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), MV, and/or ECMO and four (22%) were receiving vasopressor support. The median ferritin level was 1953 ng/ml and 13/18 (72%) of patients were lymphopenic. The median baseline SpO2/FiO2 was 202 (range 110–336). The median duration from symptom onset to infliximab-abda therapy was 10 days (range: 5–29 days), and the median duration from hospitalization to infliximab-abda therapy was 2 days (range: 0–7 days).
Table 1.

Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes following infliximab-abda

TMC-OFFTMC-001TMC-002TMC-003TMC-004TMC-005TMC-006TMC-007TMC-008TMC-009TMC-010TMC-011TMC-012TMC-013TMC-014TMC-015TMC-016TMC-017
Age (range, years)>60>6021–40>6041–60>6041–60>6041–60>60>6041–60>60>6041–6041–60>6041–60
SexFemaleMaleMaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleMaleMale
Race or ethnic group minority (Yes/No)YesYesNoYesYesNoYesNoYesYesYesNoYesNoYesYesNoYes
Charlson Comorbidity Index660413031231942252
Baseline laboratory values
Lymphocyte vount (K/ul)0.80.81.40.71.30.20.40.40.50.90.70.811.20.40.50.71
LDH (IU/l)503372544403375313431493415321613490595835313361599339
Ferritin (ng/ml)47731407224415981273201335221283436279206320082782189822123691122626
D-dimer (ng/ml)1969710264420183353343267491<1504859982199531176194843<150
CRP (mg/l)33.6243.264.1200.154.4108.6233.6104.358.457.9164.454.3140.329.7214.326.950.77.87
  Vasopressor supportYesNoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNoNo
  Baseline SpO2/FiO223018833211121414526120919618213427111093336220243139
  Oxygenation support*
  Time of enrollmentMVHFNCNCMVNCMVHFNCHFNCMVHFNCMVHFNCECMOMVNCHFNCHFNCHFNC
Maximum supportMVHFNCNCMVNCMVHFNCHFNCMVHFNCMVHFNCECMOMVNCMVMVHFNC
Discharge or deathNCRARARARARARANCRANCMVNCRAMVRARAMVRA
Symptom onset to infliximab-abda (days)291512135275910107810121182012
Admission toInfliximab-abda (days)635137222201231215
Hospital duration following infliximab-abda (days)2181145477121272245210437349
Primary endpoint met(days)Yes (12)Yes (3)Yes (1)Yes (3)Yes (3)Yes (3)Yes (6)NoYes (6)Yes (3)Yes (6)Yes (5)Yes (4)Yes (2)Yes (4)NoYes (12)Yes (4)
Secondary infectionsYesNoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesYesNoYesYesNo
Survival to dischargeNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesNoYesYesNoYes

RA, Room air; NC, Nasal Cannula; HFNC, High-Flow Nasal Cannula; MV, mechanical ventilator; ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Within 24 h of trial enrollment.

Via tracheostomy.

Ventilated at Day 28.

Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes following infliximab-abda RA, Room air; NC, Nasal Cannula; HFNC, High-Flow Nasal Cannula; MV, mechanical ventilator; ECMO, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Within 24 h of trial enrollment. Via tracheostomy. Ventilated at Day 28. Following infliximab-abda therapy, 16 patients (89%) met the primary endpoint of sustained improvement in SpO2/FiO2 of ≥50 for at least 48 h and 15 patients (83%) had resolution of respiratory failure to room air or nasal cannula (NC) oxygen supplementation. The median time to the primary endpoint was 4 days (range: 1–12 days). The median support duration among patients requiring NC was 3 days (range: 1–4 days), for HFNC 2.5 days (range: 2–6 days), and MV 10 days (range: 5–45 days) (Fig. 2). One patient on ECMO was successfully de-cannulated after 16 days. One patient on MV, with prior steroid and tocilizumab-failure, was successfully extubated to full recovery of respiratory failure on room air. No patient received a second dose of infliximab-abda. Fifteen patients (83%) were alive at the end of the 28-day study period, with one death occurring on Day 34. Fourteen patients (78%) were discharged after a median of 8 days (range 1–52 days), 3 on oxygen supplementation via NC, and 11 on room air.
Fig. 2.

Changes in oxygen support status following infliximab-abda treatment. Colored bars indicate the maximal level of oxygen support for each individual following treatment with infliximab-abda. The status of the patient at the last follow-up (discharged, alive, or dead) is indicated. ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Changes in oxygen support status following infliximab-abda treatment. Colored bars indicate the maximal level of oxygen support for each individual following treatment with infliximab-abda. The status of the patient at the last follow-up (discharged, alive, or dead) is indicated. ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. By Day 3, there was a significant decline from elevated baseline levels in a subset of pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory cytokines, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis and/or adverse outcomes from severe COVID-19 illness, including IP-10, IL-10, IL-27, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [1,5,8,16-18] (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1). Among patients with elevated IL-6 levels at baseline, including one without steroid exposure, sharp declines at Day 3 were uniformly observed (Fig. 3, Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2). CRP and ferritin were significantly lower as well. Reduction of the CXCR3-ligands IP-10 and CXCL-9 [8,16], IL-27, CRP, and ferritin at Day 14 were sustained although only IP-10 stood up to adjustment for multiple comparisons among the 50 cytokines and markers assessed. The majority of cytokines assessed did not change significantly, either on Day 3 or Day 14 (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 1).
Fig. 3.

Decline in key cytokines and inflammatory markers following infliximab-abda therapy. Values from individuals are connected with solid lines, with deceased individuals indicated in red. Statistics: n = 18, paired ratio t-test compared to baseline; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, n.s., not significant.

Decline in key cytokines and inflammatory markers following infliximab-abda therapy. Values from individuals are connected with solid lines, with deceased individuals indicated in red. Statistics: n = 18, paired ratio t-test compared to baseline; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, n.s., not significant. Among 13 patients who were lymphopenic at baseline, six (46%) had complete resolution of lymphopenia by Day 3, and 11 recovered by Day 14. Absolute lymphocyte counts (normal 1.0–4.0 K/µl) increased from an average baseline of 0.8–1.0 K/µl by Day 3 (P = 0.038, n = 17) and 1.7 K/µl by Day 14/discharge (P = 0.0004, n = 13). Absolute monocyte counts (normal 0.2–0.8 K/µl) also increased from an average baseline of 0.5–0.8 K/µl by Day 3 (P = 0.0045, n = 17) and 1.1 K/µl by Day 14/discharge (P = 0.002, n = 13). Accordingly, the strongest correlation between dynamic changes in IP-10 among all tested cytokines between baseline and Day 3 (Supplemental Table 2) was with CXCL-9 (Pearson r: 0.653, P-value: 0.004, n = 17), in particular among lymphopenic patients (Pearson r: 0.843, P-value: 0.0003, n = 13) and those that recovered by Day 3 (Pearson r: 0.98, P-value: 0.0006, n = 6) and Day 14 (Pearson r: 0.85, P-value 0.008, n = 8 evaluable), whereas this correlation was not detectable among the small number of non-lymphopenic patients (Pearson r: −0.217, P-value: 0.782, n = 4). Among the non-lymphopenic patients, IP-10 decline correlated instead with IL12p40, a homodimeric inhibitory subunit of IL-12. Infliximab-abda was well tolerated. Two patients experienced transient Grade 1 infusion-related reactions. Transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) elevations occurred in 11 patients (16 events, 2 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3, 1 Grade 4), but the association with infliximab-abda could not be clearly inferred given the comorbidities and concurrent remdesivir use. The Grade 3 and Grade 4 events resolved fully. Two cases of transient asymptomatic bradycardia (Grade 1) were noted. There were no cases of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism; all patients were managed per institutional guidelines for prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. Two cases of asymptomatic bradycardia (Grade 1) were noted, of uncertain association with infliximab-abda. Transient clinical worsening among two patients following rapid lymphocyte recovery in the absence of identifiable infection raised suspicions of an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). One patient with suspected IRIS received high-dose steroids with subsequent clinical improvement, but later succumbed to secondary infection. All active infections were considered as controlled at the time of infliximab-abda administration. Seventeen secondary infections were encountered in eight patients (44%), all of whom were mechanically ventilated or on ECMO for critical respiratory failure. Four patients were diabetic, three had chronic lung disease, seven had hypertension, and all had prior steroid therapy for a median duration of 5 days. The majority of enrolled patients with diabetes (4/5), chronic lung disease (3/4), hypertension (7/12), and those on MV/ECMO support (8/9) were eventually diagnosed with secondary infections. Nine infections (53%) were bacterial, four (24%) were fungal, and four (24%) were viral in etiology (Supplemental Table 3). Median time to diagnosis was 9 days (range: 1–35 days). The most common diagnosis was ventilator-associated pneumonia (41%). Two instances of herpes simplex virus pneumonitis were observed, one of which was diagnosed at autopsy with concomitant necrotizing pyogenic infection in a patient with underlying diabetes, hypertension, and obesity who had received high-dose parenteral steroids. One possible and two probable instances of COVID-19-associated CAPA were encountered, of whom two died. Both deaths occurred in patients with preexisting chronic lung disease. Two patients (11%) were diagnosed with low-level cytomegalovirus viremia, not requiring treatment. One death was attributed to aspiration and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a frail elderly patient, following recovery after prolonged MV. The deaths in the study did not correlate with the improvements with oxygenation as specified in the primary endpoint (Table 1), but with late-emerging events during hospitalization as described.

Discussion

Notwithstanding the uncontrolled nature of these observations, the clinical and translational outcomes following infliximab-abda administration are consistent with the hypothesis that TNFα is a major regulator of the adverse cytokine signature and pathobiology of severe and critical COVID-19 respiratory failure. One of the most striking outcomes was the rapid and sustained decline in the markedly elevated levels of IP-10, potentially generated by the aberrantly amplified synergy between IFN-γ and TNFα as previously proposed from preclinical modeling [7], and which has strongly correlated with adverse outcomes [8,19]. IP-10 has been mechanistically implicated in the pathogenesis of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [20] and elevations of IP-10 in COVID-19 may predict the duration of MV [21]. Our pilot data predict that TNFα-antagonist therapy, specifically infliximab-abda, may rapidly control IP-10 and associated pathological inflammatory signaling. Rapid resolution of lymphopenia in our study may reflect the concordant drop in IP-10 and CXCL-9 which drive tissue redistribution of activated memory T-lymphocytes via CXCR3 receptors [7,22]. Upregulation of these CXCR3 ligands in the lung microenvironment may similarly drive peripheral depletion of CXCR3+ monocytes with induction of macrophage differentiation, which progressively replaces resident alveolar macrophages [23,24]. Further release of IFN-γ and TNFα by extravasated T-cells [24] and monocytes/macrophages [25] respectively, sustain and amplify the feedforward pathological signaling loop, driving a major escalation in IP-10 and inflammatory cytokines. In this regard, single-cell transcriptomic profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens has identified a striking abundance of CXCL10 + CCL-2+ inflammatory macrophages, a phenotype that is shared across tissues from inflammatory diseases that respond to TNF-antagonists, including rheumatoid arthritis synovium, inflamed Crohn’s disease ileum, and ulcerative colitis specimens. Furthermore, this transcriptional phenotype was experimentally induced in human blood-derived macrophages by costimulation with IFN-γ and TNFα specifically, and demonstrated the activation of a combination of JAK-STAT and NF-kappa B signaling pathways which upregulate multiple inflammatory mediators [26]. As with peripheral blood lymphocyte counts, increasing monocyte counts following infliximab-abda therapy in our study may reflect the reversal of this process. The study observations and mechanistic considerations described here (Fig. 4), align with a proposed chemokine immune signature in severe COVID-19, dominated by IP-10/CXCL-9 [19]. Prospective validation of chemokine signatures may allow disease stratification by severity, predict survival outcomes and permit future individualization of therapeutic strategies.
Fig. 4.

Concept map of a feed-forward signaling loop implicating TNFα in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 respiratory failure.

Concept map of a feed-forward signaling loop implicating TNFα in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 respiratory failure. The rapid decreases in TNFα and IL-6 from their elevated baseline values by Day 3 appeared to correlate well with the median time to improvement in oxygenation as defined by the primary endpoint, at Day 4. TNFα and IL-6 may exert endothelial toxicity, generate widespread capillary leak, interstitial and alveolar edema, and prothrombotic cascades [27-31] in pulmonary vascular beds. Rapid reversal of these effects may be at least one explanation for the recovery from respiratory failure. The study was conducted during a time in which the standards of care among hospitalized patients evolved to integrate remdesivir and dexamethasone, which nearly all patients received prior to infliximab-abda administration. Although clinicopathological outcomes arguably reflect the combination of these agents, in addition to convalescent plasma and supportive antimicrobial therapies, one patient did not receive prior remdesivir or glucocorticoid therapy. The cytokine profile following infliximab-abda therapy in this steroid-naïve patient exemplifies the rapid and sustained reductions from markedly elevated baseline values of IP-10, IL-6, IL-10, CXCL-9, and TNFα (Supplemental Fig. 2) seen in the majority of patients, demonstrating that this response can be independent of steroid therapy. In vitro models demonstrate the lack of impact of glucocorticoids on IP-10 and CXCL-9 secretion induced by IFNγ and TNFα in airway epithelial cells [7]. This suggests that TNFα-blockade may represent a therapeutic strategy that could offer more precise and durable control of the hyperinflammatory cytokine signature of COVID-19 than broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory effects of steroid therapy. Furthermore, IL-6 could not induce IP-10 and CXCL-9 secretion [7], which may infer a limit to the effectiveness of IL-6-directed therapies in controlling the broader hyperinflammatory picture of serious COVID-19 illness. Importantly, serial cytokine profiling from steroid and IL-6-directed randomized clinical trials have not been reported to allow formal assessment of these points [32-34]. The high rate of clinical recovery in our study population and the favorable results of cytokine profiling discussed above, suggests that dual TNFα and IFN-γ targeting, which has been proposed based on preclinical modeling of lethal COVID-19 [1], may not be required. The attenuated yet elevated levels of CXCL-9 contrasted with uniformly diminished IP-10 levels at Day 14 may reflect restoration of physiological IFN-γ-mediated immunosurveillance, rather than persistent pathological signaling [7,22]. In contrast to the lymphopenic subgroup, a strong association between IP-10 and IL12p40 (and not IL12p70) declines was suggested among the small number of non-lymphopenic patients. IL-12 directs the proliferation of activated T lymphocytes toward a Th1 phenotype. The heterodimeric molecule IL-12p70, equates with IL-12 biological activity, whereas IL-12p40 may antagonize IL-12 and inhibit cytotoxic T lymphocyte generation [35]. Increased IL-12 levels derived from macrophages and dendritic cells contribute to the heterogeneity of cytokine storms [36] and restoration of physiological IL12p40:IL-12p70 ratios may recover T-cell function. Another noteworthy finding was the early and sustained decline in IL-27 (Fig. 2) which has been co-implicated with TNFα in association with disease severity among older patients, but in a cytokine network distinct from TNFα [18]. IL-27 may drive an IFN-γ/TNFα-independent program of immune exhaustion, via potent induction of Tim-3 and IL-10 [37]. In keeping with this potential mechanism of treatment resistance to TNFα-antagonists, two of four patients who died were evaluable with cytokine assays at Day 14; both had rising levels of IL-10, one with a rising IL-27 (Fig. 3). It should be noted that the primary endpoint of the study, an arbitrary threshold of sustained improvement in oxygenation in patients with severe and critical respiratory failure, did not eventually predict for recovery or survival at 28 days. Furthermore, variable deployment of measures such as proning, airway management, positive airway pressure, and flow rates, independent of estimated Fi02 may further mitigate the predictive value of this endpoint. The secondary endpoints of sustained recovery from severe and critical respiratory failure and 28-day mortality are more definitive outcomes. Historically, short-term TNF-antagonist therapy has been studied in the critical care setting of septic shock, with a small survival benefit as assessed in meta-analyses [38,39]. Longer term use of TNF-antagonists has been associated with an increased risk of a variety of infections including fungal and mycobacterial illnesses, particularly when combined with steroid therapy [40,41]. The frequency and spectrum of secondary infections and related deaths observed in this study require additional scrutiny in randomized studies of TNF-antagonists in severe and critical COVID-19, with particular caution among patients with preexisting lung disease and/or multiple comorbid factors such as diabetes or prolonged/high doses of steroids, while on MV [42,43]. Herpes simplex reactivation has been associated with prolonged MV and may be routinely underdiagnosed [44,45]. Prospective polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based evaluation of tracheal aspirates in patients with critical COVID-19 illness on MV for longer than 7 days demonstrated herpesviridae (herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus, or both) reactivation in 18/38 (47%) patients. Patients with herpesviridae reactivation had longer durations of MV (23 vs. 9 days) [44]. Although a retrospective analysis suggested that the use of antiviral therapy improved outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with evidence of herpes simplex reactivation in the respiratory tract [46], a prospective randomized trial of acyclovir among mechanically ventilated patients with oropharyngeal reactivation of herpes simplex could not demonstrate clinical benefit [47]. The value of routine surveillance is therefore uncertain. Taken together, an association with infliximab-therapy with herpesviridae reactivation in the COVID-19 population cannot be readily inferred. Similarly, estimates of CAPA in COVID-19 have varied widely, from 3–5% to 35% of patients with ARDS with only a small subset of these meeting a stringent tissue-based definition of proven infection [13,43]. Diffuse inflammatory lung injury, chronic lung disease, steroids, antibiotics, lymphopenia, and immune exhaustion may all predispose to colonization and invasive aspergillus infections. Unfortunately, autopsy permission was granted in only one of three infection-related deaths on study and suspected cases of CAPA remained formally unproven. Recommendations for surveillance, prophylaxis, and therapy for CAPA in COVID-19 are evolving and harmonization of practice may generate more reliable outcomes data [13,43]. Altogether three patients on our study had documented bloodstream infections, two with cytomegalovirus viremia and one with a positive serum PCR result for herpes simplex. A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted by the National Institutes of Health (ACTIV-1, NCT04593940) features eligibility criteria and a treatment plan similar to this study, integrating an infliximab arm combined with remdesivir, and permitting dexamethasone and convalescent plasma. The principal endpoint of ACTIV-1 is an improvement in time to recovery within 29 days with mortality as a secondary endpoint. Given that dexamethasone is likely to be widely employed in both control and experimental arms, whether TNFα-antagonist monotherapy will offer greater precision, clinical efficacy, and safety over dexamethasone or other cytokine-directed therapeutics in severe and critical COVID-19 respiratory failure may remain an open question. While serial cytokine assays tethered to cellular markers of immune exhaustion can shed additional light on disease heterogeneity, with correlates of response and resistance to TNFα-antagonists, the importance of survival as the optimal principal endpoint of adequately powered trials has been emphasized [34].
  46 in total

Review 1.  CXCR3 ligands: redundant, collaborative and antagonistic functions.

Authors:  Joanna R Groom; Andrew D Luster
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 2.  Serious infection during etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A literature review.

Authors:  Colum Downey
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Herpes simplex virus lung infection in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Charles-Edouard Luyt; Alain Combes; Claire Deback; Marie-Hélène Aubriot-Lorton; Ania Nieszkowska; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Frédérique Capron; Henri Agut; Claude Gibert; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Thrombin and tumor necrosis factor alpha synergistically stimulate tissue factor expression in human endothelial cells: regulation through c-Fos and c-Jun.

Authors:  Yuchuan Liu; Katrina Pelekanakis; Marilyn J Woolkalis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Interleukin-6, CXCL10 and Infiltrating Macrophages in COVID-19-Related Cytokine Storm: Not One for All But All for One!

Authors:  Francesca Coperchini; Luca Chiovato; Mario Rotondi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Plasma IL-6 levels following corticosteroid therapy as an indicator of ICU length of stay in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Samir Awasthi; Tyler Wagner; A J Venkatakrishnan; Arjun Puranik; Matthew Hurchik; Vineet Agarwal; Ian Conrad; Christian Kirkup; Raman Arunachalam; John O'Horo; Walter Kremers; Rahul Kashyap; William Morice; John Halamka; Amy W Williams; William A Faubion; Andrew D Badley; Gregory J Gores; Venky Soundararajan
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 7.  Cytokine Storms: Understanding COVID-19.

Authors:  Nilam Mangalmurti; Christopher A Hunter
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Trials of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for COVID-19 are urgently needed.

Authors:  Marc Feldmann; Ravinder N Maini; James N Woody; Stephen T Holgate; Gregory Winter; Matthew Rowland; Duncan Richards; Tracy Hussell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A dynamic COVID-19 immune signature includes associations with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Adam G Laing; Anna Lorenc; Irene Del Molino Del Barrio; Abhishek Das; Matthew Fish; Leticia Monin; Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz; Duncan R McKenzie; Thomas S Hayday; Isaac Francos-Quijorna; Shraddha Kamdar; Magdalene Joseph; Daniel Davies; Richard Davis; Aislinn Jennings; Iva Zlatareva; Pierre Vantourout; Yin Wu; Vasiliki Sofra; Florencia Cano; Maria Greco; Efstathios Theodoridis; Joshua D Freedman; Sarah Gee; Julie Nuo En Chan; Sarah Ryan; Eva Bugallo-Blanco; Pärt Peterson; Kai Kisand; Liis Haljasmägi; Loubna Chadli; Philippe Moingeon; Lauren Martinez; Blair Merrick; Karen Bisnauthsing; Kate Brooks; Mohammad A A Ibrahim; Jeremy Mason; Federico Lopez Gomez; Kola Babalola; Sultan Abdul-Jawad; John Cason; Christine Mant; Jeffrey Seow; Carl Graham; Katie J Doores; Francesca Di Rosa; Jonathan Edgeworth; Manu Shankar-Hari; Adrian C Hayday
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 87.241

10.  Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Chenguang Shen; Jinxiu Li; Jing Yuan; Jinli Wei; Fengmin Huang; Fuxiang Wang; Guobao Li; Yanjie Li; Li Xing; Ling Peng; Minghui Yang; Mengli Cao; Haixia Zheng; Weibo Wu; Rongrong Zou; Delin Li; Zhixiang Xu; Haiyan Wang; Mingxia Zhang; Zheng Zhang; George F Gao; Chengyu Jiang; Lei Liu; Yingxia Liu
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.290

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the role of chemokines and chemokine receptors involved in coronavirus infection.

Authors:  Gema Olivarria; Thomas E Lane
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.124

Review 2.  Cell deaths: Involvement in the pathogenesis and intervention therapy of COVID-19.

Authors:  Xue Li; Ziqi Zhang; Zhenling Wang; Pedro Gutiérrez-Castrellón; Huashan Shi
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 3.  COVID-19 therapeutics: Challenges and directions for the future.

Authors:  Philip C Robinson; David F L Liew; Helen L Tanner; John R Grainger; Raymond A Dwek; Ronald B Reisler; Lawrence Steinman; Marc Feldmann; Ling-Pei Ho; Tracy Hussell; Paul Moss; Duncan Richards; Nicole Zitzmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  A Peek into Pandora's Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Abhishek Chandra; Ashu Johri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-30

Review 5.  Targeting TNF-α for COVID-19: Recent Advanced and Controversies.

Authors:  Yi Guo; Ke Hu; Yuxuan Li; Chanjun Lu; Ken Ling; Chuanqi Cai; Weici Wang; Dawei Ye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 6.  Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Idecabtagene Vicleucel in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Evidence to Date.

Authors:  Hashim Mann; Raymond L Comenzo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Inflammatory pathways in COVID-19: Mechanism and therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Yujie Jiang; Tingmei Zhao; Xueyan Zhou; Yu Xiang; Pedro Gutierrez-Castrellon; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Changes in lactate dehydrogenase on admission throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and possible impacts on prognostic capability.

Authors:  Elba O Medina-Hernández; Lucía M Pérez-Navarro; Joselín Hernández-Ruiz; Alma Villalobos-Osnaya; María L Hernández-Medel; Catalina Casillas-Suárez; Adolfo Pérez-García
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.498

9.  IL27 gene expression distinguishes multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children from febrile illness in a South African cohort.

Authors:  Timothy F Spracklen; Simon C Mendelsohn; Claire Butters; Heidi Facey-Thomas; Raphaella Stander; Debbie Abrahams; Mzwandile Erasmus; Richard Baguma; Jonathan Day; Christiaan Scott; Liesl J Zühlke; George Kassiotis; Thomas J Scriba; Kate Webb
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 8.786

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.