Charles-Edouard Luyt1, Jean-Marie Forel2, David Hajage3, Samir Jaber4, Sophie Cayot-Constantin5, Thomas Rimmelé6, Elisabeth Coupez7, Qin Lu8, Mamadou Hassimiou Diallo9, Christine Penot-Ragon10, Marc Clavel11, Carole Schwebel12, Jean-François Timsit13, Jean-Pierre Bedos14, Caroline Hauw-Berlemont15, Jérémy Bourenne16, Julien Mayaux17, Jean-Yves Lefrant18, Jean-Paul Mira19, Alain Combes1, Michel Wolff20, Jean Chastre1, Laurent Papazian2. 1. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 2. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Aix-Marseille Université, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. 3. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie, Paris, France. 4. Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital St-Eloi, Montpellier, France. 5. Département de médecine periopératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 6. Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. 7. Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 8. Réanimation Chirurgicale Polyvalente, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 9. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Paris, France. 10. Pharmacie, Hôpitaux Sud, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. 11. Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France. 12. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France. 13. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 14. Service de Réanimation, Hôpital Mignot, Versailles, France. 15. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 16. Réanimation des Urgences et Médicale, Aix-Marseille Université, Hôpital Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. 17. Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 18. Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, Nîmes, France. 19. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 20. Réanimation Neurochirurgicale, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Abstract
Importance: The role of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation on morbidity and mortality in patients in the intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether preemptive treatment with intravenous acyclovir reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 16 intensive care units in France. Participants included 239 adults (age, >18 years) who receivedmechanical ventilation for at least 96 hours and continued to receive mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more, with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation. Patients were enrolled between February 2, 2014, and February 22, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive intravenous acyclovir, 5 mg/kg, 3 times daily for 14 days or a matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was ventilator-free days from randomization to day 60. Prespecified secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days. Main analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Of 239 patients enrolled and randomized, 1 patient withdrew consent, leaving 238 patients, with 119 patients in both theacyclovir and placebo (control) groups (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-70] years; 76 [32%] women) available for primary outcome measurement. On day 60, the median (IQR) numbers of ventilator-free days were 35 (0-53) for acyclovir recipients and 36 (0-50]) for controls (P = .17 for between-group comparison). Among secondary outcomes, 26 patients (22%) and 39 patients (33%) had died at day 60 (risk difference, 0.11, 95% CI, -0.004 to 0.22, P = .06). The adverse event frequency was similar for both groups (28% in the acyclovir group and 23% in the placebo group, P = .40), particularly acute renal failure post randomization affecting 3 acyclovir recipients (3%) and 2 controls (2%). Four patients (3%) in the acyclovir group vs none in the placebo group stopped the study drug for treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients receiving mechanical ventilation for 96 hours or more with HSV reactivation in the throat, use of acyclovir, 5 mg/kg, 3 times daily for 14 days, did not increase the number of ventilator-free days at day 60, compared with placebo. These findings do not appear to support routine preemptive use of acyclovir in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152358.
RCT Entities:
Importance: The role of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation on morbidity and mortality in patients in the intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether preemptive treatment with intravenous acyclovir reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 16 intensive care units in France. Participants included 239 adults (age, >18 years) who received mechanical ventilation for at least 96 hours and continued to receive mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or more, with HSV oropharyngeal reactivation. Patients were enrolled between February 2, 2014, and February 22, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive intravenous acyclovir, 5 mg/kg, 3 times daily for 14 days or a matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was ventilator-free days from randomization to day 60. Prespecified secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days. Main analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Of 239 patients enrolled and randomized, 1 patient withdrew consent, leaving 238 patients, with 119 patients in both the acyclovir and placebo (control) groups (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-70] years; 76 [32%] women) available for primary outcome measurement. On day 60, the median (IQR) numbers of ventilator-free days were 35 (0-53) for acyclovir recipients and 36 (0-50]) for controls (P = .17 for between-group comparison). Among secondary outcomes, 26 patients (22%) and 39 patients (33%) had died at day 60 (risk difference, 0.11, 95% CI, -0.004 to 0.22, P = .06). The adverse event frequency was similar for both groups (28% in the acyclovir group and 23% in the placebo group, P = .40), particularly acute renal failure post randomization affecting 3 acyclovir recipients (3%) and 2 controls (2%). Four patients (3%) in the acyclovir group vs none in the placebo group stopped the study drug for treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients receiving mechanical ventilation for 96 hours or more with HSV reactivation in the throat, use of acyclovir, 5 mg/kg, 3 times daily for 14 days, did not increase the number of ventilator-free days at day 60, compared with placebo. These findings do not appear to support routine preemptive use of acyclovir in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152358.
Authors: Giacomo Bellani; John G Laffey; Tài Pham; Eddy Fan; Laurent Brochard; Andres Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Frank van Haren; Anders Larsson; Daniel F McAuley; Marco Ranieri; Gordon Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Hermann Wrigge; Arthur S Slutsky; Antonio Pesenti Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: N De Vos; L Van Hoovels; A Vankeerberghen; K Van Vaerenbergh; A Boel; I Demeyer; L Creemers; H De Beenhouwer Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Lucy Ryan; Andrew Heed; Jonathan Foster; Manoj Valappil; Matthias L Schmid; Christopher J A Duncan Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Patrick M Honore; Aude Mugisha; Luc Kugener; Sebastien Redant; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Sami Hraiech; Eline Bonnardel; Christophe Guervilly; Cyprien Fabre; Anderson Loundou; Jean-Marie Forel; Mélanie Adda; Gabriel Parzy; Guilhem Cavaille; Benjamin Coiffard; Antoine Roch; Laurent Papazian Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 6.925