Literature DB >> 3445463

Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity of the pigmented rat determined electrophysiologically.

L C Silveira1, C A Heywood, A Cowey.   

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function of the rat was assessed by investigating the relationship between the amplitude of visually evoked cortical potentials (VECP) and the spatial frequency and contrast of grating stimuli. Pattern reversal VECPs were recorded in Area 17 in the region of representation of the central binocular visual field. Transient responses were obtained with a 1 Hz contrast reversal. The mean contralateral monocular CSF peaked around 0.1 c/deg, with a threshold sensitivity of 20-25, low frequency attenuation and a high frequency cut-off of 1.18 c/deg. The mean binocular CSF showed a cut-off of 1.20 c/deg, which matches several behavioural measurements of visual acuity. The greater binocular sensitivity in the low frequency range (0.04 c/deg) could be tentatively attributed to the greater influence of the population of large ganglion cells that reaches its maximal density in the ipsilateral projection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3445463     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Contrast sensitivity in pigeons: a comparison of behavioral and pattern ERG methods.

Authors:  William Hodos; Mimi M Ghim; Alex Potocki; Jessica N Fields; Thilo Storm
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Spatial receptive field properties of rat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Walter F Heine; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Nonthermal ablation with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound close to the optic tract without affecting nerve function.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Ferenc Jolesz; Natalia Vykhodtseva
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Contrast sensitivity in rats with increased or decreased numbers of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  C A Heywod; L C Silveira; A Cowey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  High-resolution VSDI retinotopic mapping via a DLP-based projection system.

Authors:  Adi Gross; Nadav H Ivzan; Nairouz Farah; Yossi Mandel
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Holographic display system for restoration of sight to the blind.

Authors:  G A Goetz; Y Mandel; R Manivanh; D V Palanker; T Čižmár
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Pattern ERG in rats following section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  N Berardi; L Domenici; A Gravina; L Maffei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Nerve growth factor prevents the amblyopic effects of monocular deprivation.

Authors:  L Domenici; N Berardi; G Carmignoto; G Vantini; L Maffei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Different effects of intracranial and intraorbital section of the optic nerve on the functional responses of rat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  L Domenici; A Gravina; N Berardi; L Maffei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.