Literature DB >> 24010975

Nonthermal ablation with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound close to the optic tract without affecting nerve function.

Nathan McDannold1, Yong-Zhi Zhang, Chanikarn Power, Ferenc Jolesz, Natalia Vykhodtseva.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Tumors at the skull base are challenging for both resection and radiosurgery given the presence of critical adjacent structures, such as cranial nerves, blood vessels, and brainstem. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided thermal ablation via laser or other methods has been evaluated as a minimally invasive alternative to these techniques in the brain. Focused ultrasound (FUS) offers a noninvasive method of thermal ablation; however, skull heating limits currently available technology to ablation at regions distant from the skull bone. Here, the authors evaluated a method that circumvents this problem by combining the FUS exposures with injected microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent. These microbubbles concentrate the ultrasound-induced effects on the vasculature, enabling an ablation method that does not cause significant heating of the brain or skull.
METHODS: In 29 rats, a 525-kHz FUS transducer was used to ablate tissue structures at the skull base that were centered on or adjacent to the optic tract or chiasm. Low-intensity, low-duty-cycle ultrasound exposures (sonications) were applied for 5 minutes after intravenous injection of an ultrasound contrast agent (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc.). Using histological analysis and visual evoked potential (VEP) measurements, the authors determined whether structural or functional damage was induced in the optic tract or chiasm.
RESULTS: Overall, while the sonications produced a well-defined lesion in the gray matter targets, the adjacent tract and chiasm had comparatively little or no damage. No significant changes (p > 0.05) were found in the magnitude or latency of the VEP recordings, either immediately after sonication or at later times up to 4 weeks after sonication, and no delayed effects were evident in the histological features of the optic nerve and retina.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique, which selectively targets the intravascular microbubbles, appears to be a promising method of noninvasively producing sharply demarcated lesions in deep brain structures while preserving function in adjacent nerves. Because of low vascularity--and thus a low microbubble concentration--some large white matter tracts appear to have some natural resistance to this type of ablation compared with gray matter. While future work is needed to develop methods of monitoring the procedure and establishing its safety at deep brain targets, the technique does appear to be a potential solution that allows FUS ablation of deep brain targets while sparing adjacent nerve structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24010975      PMCID: PMC4028139          DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS122387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  54 in total

1.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Binh C Tran; Jongbum Seo; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans.

Authors:  J F Aubry; M Tanter; M Pernot; J L Thomas; M Fink
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multiphoton imaging of ultrasound/Optison mediated cerebrovascular effects in vivo.

Authors:  Scott B Raymond; Jesse Skoch; Kullervo Hynynen; Brian J Bacskai
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Wayne Kreider; Andrew A Brayman; Michael R Bailey; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging- guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: initial findings in 3 patients.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Greg T Clement; Peter Black; Ferenc Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Guoyun Wang; Kai Hu; Ping Ma; Jin Bai; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-04

8.  MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Nir Lipsman; Michael L Schwartz; Yuexi Huang; Liesly Lee; Tejas Sankar; Martin Chapman; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Focused ultrasound effects on nerve action potential in vitro.

Authors:  Vincent Colucci; Gary Strichartz; Ferenc Jolesz; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  The effects of certain H(1)-antagonists on visual evoked potential in rats.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Iwamura; Yoko Fujii; Chiaki Kamei
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  21 in total

1.  Noninvasive Ultrasonic Drug Uncaging Maps Whole-Brain Functional Networks.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wang; Muna Aryal; Qian Zhong; Daivik B Vyas; Raag D Airan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Focused Ultrasound: An Emerging Therapeutic Modality for Neurologic Disease.

Authors:  Paul S Fishman; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Design of patient-specific focused ultrasound arrays for non-invasive brain therapy with increased trans-skull transmission and steering range.

Authors:  Alec Hughes; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Intracranial Non-thermal Ablation Mediated by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound and Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Chenguang Peng; Tao Sun; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Chanikarn Power; Yongzhi Zhang; Nathan Mcdannold; Tyrone Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Cavitation-enhanced nonthermal ablation in deep brain targets: feasibility in a large animal model.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Ferenc Jolesz; Margaret Livingstone; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Nonthermal ablation in the rat brain using focused ultrasound and an ultrasound contrast agent: long-term effects.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Yongzhi Zhang; Natalia Vykhodtseva
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Equivalence of cell survival data for radiation dose and thermal dose in ablative treatments: analysis applied to essential tremor thalamotomy by focused ultrasound and gamma knife.

Authors:  D Schlesinger; M Lee; G Ter Haar; B Sela; M Eames; J Snell; N Kassell; J Sheehan; J M Larner; J-F Aubry
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  3-D Transcranial Microbubble Cavitation Localization by Four Sensors.

Authors:  Zhongtao Hu; Lu Xu; Chih-Yen Chien; Yaoheng Yang; Yan Gong; Dezhuang Ye; Christopher Pham Pacia; Hong Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Repeated Acoustic Vaporization of Perfluorohexane Nanodroplets for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Austin Van Namen; Sidhartha Jandhyala; Tomas Jordan; Geoffrey P Luke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.