| Literature DB >> 34452558 |
Luana Aparecida Alves Da Silva1, Celina Angélica Mattos Machado1, Edenice De Oliveira Santana2, Mariana Nunes Da Silva3, Jorge Vinícius Cestari Felix4, Namie Okino Sawada5, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Guimarães6, Luciana Puchalski Kalinke4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the relaxation technique with guided imagery by means of virtual reality on health-related quality of life in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: Bone Marrow Transplantation; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Imagery (Psychotherapy); Relaxation Therapy; Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34452558 PMCID: PMC8629476 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.8.2453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1T1-Time 1 (First day of hospitalization); T2-Time 2 (Day zero, day on which transplantation was performed); T3-Time 3 (Neutropenia stage); T4-Time 4 (Pre-hospital discharge)
Sociodemographic and Clinical Characterization of the Participants Included in the Study
| Variables | IG | CG | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 22 | 62.86 | 4 | 57.14 | 26 | 61.90 |
| Female | 13 | 37.14 | 3 | 42.86 | 16 | 38.10 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married/Stable Union | 17 | 48.57 | 3 | 42.86 | 20 | 47.62 |
| Single | 16 | 45.71 | 4 | 57.14 | 20 | 47.62 |
| Widowed | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Divorced | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Family income | ||||||
| No income | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Up to US$ 210,00 | 3 | 8.57 | 3 | 7.14 | ||
| Above US$ 210,00 and up to US$ 630,00 | 21 | 60 | 5 | 71.43 | 26 | 61.90 |
| Above US$ 630,00 and up to US$ 2100,00 | 4 | 11.43 | 1 | 14.29 | 5 | 11.90 |
| Above US$ 2100,00 and up to US$ 4200,00 | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Above US$ 4200,00 | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Did not know | 4 | 11.43 | 1 | 14.29 | 5 | 11.90 |
| Type of HSCT | ||||||
| Allogeneic – related donor | 15 | 42.86 | 2 | 28.57 | 17 | 40.48 |
| Allogeneic – haploidentical donor | 4 | 11.43 | 1 | 14.29 | 5 | 11.90 |
| Allogeneic – unrelated donor | 9 | 25.71 | 2 | 28.57 | 11 | 26.19 |
| Autologous | 7 | 20 | 2 | 28.57 | 9 | 21.43 |
| Source of HST | ||||||
| Peripheral blood | 18 | 51.43 | 2 | 28.57 | 20 | 47.62 |
| Bone marrow | 16 | 45.71 | 5 | 71.43 | 21 | 50.00 |
| Bone marrow and Peripheral blood | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Diagnosis | ||||||
| Leukemias | 13 | 37.14 | 3 | 42.86 | 16 | 38.10 |
| Lymphomas | 7 | 20 | 1 | 14.29 | 8 | 19.05 |
| Multiple myeloma | 2 | 5.71 | 1 | 14.29 | 3 | 7.14 |
| Myelodysplasia | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Myelofibrosis | 1 | 2.86 | 1 | 2.38 | ||
| Severe Aplastic Anemia | 9 | 25.71 | 9 | 21.43 | ||
| Others | 2 | 5.71 | 2 | 28.57 | 4 | 9.52 |
Note: US$ 210.00 is the approximate amount referring to the Brazilian minimum wage during the research period. IG, Intervention group; CG, Control group; HSCT, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HST, hematopoietic stem cells.
Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life between Groups and Stages
| Scales | T1 | T1-T2 | T2 | T1-T3 | T2-T3 | T3 | T3-T4 | T4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG(n=35) | CG(n=7) | IG(n=33) | CG(n=7) | IG(n=28) | CG(n=7) | IG(n=27) | CG(n=4) | |||||
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | p | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | |
| PWB | 21.97±5.43 | 23.14±3.44 | 0.000 | 16.52±5.72 | 18±4.47 | 0.000 | - | 15.36±5.9 | 16.29±4.23 | 0.038 | 19.11±5.52 | 20±5.29 |
| SWB | 22.22±4.50 | 20.74±4.71 | - | 21.56±4.41 | 21.31±4.85 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 20.96±4.96 | 17.29±4.45 | - | 21.02±5.26 | 20,08±3.06 |
| EWB | 19,37±3.93 | 18.57±4.24 | - | 18.82±4.95 | 20±2.38 | - | - | 19.46±4 | 18.29±3.45 | - | 20±4.18 | 19.75±1.71 |
| FWB | 20.67±4.71 | 19.21±4.6 | 0.019 | 17.58±4.69 | 17.71±6.29 | 0.006 | - | 16.64±5.34 | 16.14±5.05 | - | 17.70±5.66 | 17.25±3.77 |
| BMTS | 29.03±4.95 | 28±4 | - | 24.85±5.4 | 26±3.37 | 0.001 | - | 24.04±4.53 | 23.14±4.06 | 0.011 | 26.22±5.21 | 25±6 |
| TOI | 71.67±11.97 | 70.36±9.39 | 0.000 | 58.94±13.9 | 61.71±12.26 | 0.000 | - | 56.04±13.3 | 55.57±12.45 | 0.030 | 63.04±14.56 | 62.25±14.41 |
| FACT-G | 84.24±13.76 | 81.67±11.51 | 0.015 | 74.47±14 | 77.03±13.56 | 0.000 | - | 72.43±14.62 | 60±14.71 | 0.010 | 77.84±16.22 | 77.08±11.68 |
| FACT-BMT | 113.27±17.69 | 109.67±15.21 | 0.023 | 99.32±18.48 | 103.03±15.99 | 0.000 | 0.047 | 96.46±18.36 | 91.14±17.53 | 0.006 | 104.06±20.72 | 102.08±16.85 |
| FACIT-Fatigue | 39.06±10.05 | 44.43±9.20 | 0.032 | 33.64±12.49 | 38.86±9.08 | 0.000 | - | 32.98±10.65 | 32.86±9.19 | - | 35.36±11.31 | 35±12.57 |
| NS | 48.39±11 | 58.20±11.44 | 0.012 | 45.69±12.73 | 49.64±11.04 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 39.23±12.66 | 39.27±11.31 | 0.001 | 45.44±12.55 | 47.97±11.78 |
Note: The p value refers to the comparison among stages for both groups (p<0.05). From T1-T4 and T2-T4, no statistical significance was found in any of the assessments. Legend: IG-Intervention group; CG-control group; SD-Standard deviation; PWB-Physical well-being; SWB-Social/family well-being; EWB-Emotional well-being; FWB-Functional well-being; BMTS-Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale; TOI-Trial Outcome Index; FACT-G-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; FACT-BMT-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation; FACIT-Fatigue-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; NS-Neutropenia Subscale.
Correlation between Overall Quality of Life, Additional Concerns, Fatigue and Neutropenia in the Intervention Group
| r | p | n | Intercept | Inclination | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | ||||||
| FACT-G | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.628 | 0.000 | 35 | 50.67 | 0.86 |
| NS | 0.551 | 0.000 | 35 | 50.86 | 0.69 | |
| FACT-BMT | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.632 | 0.000 | 35 | 69.81 | 1.11 |
| NS | 0.543 | 0.000 | 35 | 71.03 | 0.87 | |
| T2 | ||||||
| FACT-G | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.76 | 0.000 | 33 | 45.96 | 0.85 |
| NS | 0.77 | 0.000 | 33 | 35.78 | 0.85 | |
| FACT-BMT | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.76 | 0.000 | 33 | 61.34 | 1.13 |
| NS | 0.75 | 0.000 | 33 | 49.68 | 1.09 | |
| T3 | ||||||
| FACT-G | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.65 | 0.000 | 28 | 43.18 | 0.89 |
| NS | 0.6 | 0.000 | 28 | 45.47 | 0.69 | |
| FACT-BMT | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.64 | 0.000 | 28 | 59.85 | 1.11 |
| NS | 0.6 | 0.000 | 28 | 62.29 | 0.87 | |
| T4 | ||||||
| FACT-G | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.75 | 0.000 | 27 | 39.81 | 1.08 |
| NS | 0.71 | 0.000 | 27 | 36.07 | 0.92 | |
| FACT-BMT | FACIT-Fatigue | 0.78 | 0.000 | 27 | 53.51 | 1.43 |
| NS | 0.73 | 0.000 | 27 | 49.47 | 1.20 |
Legend: * p <0.000; r-Pearson’s correlation coefficient; p-probability of significance; SD-Standard deviation; FACT-G-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; FACT-BMT-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation; FACIT-Fatigue-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue.