| Literature DB >> 34443463 |
Mongi Saoudi1, Riadh Badraoui2,3, Ahlem Chira1, Mohd Saeed2, Nouha Bouali2, Salem Elkahoui2, Jahoor M Alam2, Choumous Kallel4, Abdelfattah El Feki1.
Abstract
In our study, Allium subhirsutum L. (AS) was investigated to assess its phenolic profile and bioactive molecules including flavonoids and organosulfur compounds. The antioxidant potential of AS and wound healing activity were addressed using skin wound healing and oxidative stress and inflammation marker estimation in rat models. Phytochemical and antiradical activities of AS extract (ASE) and oil (ASO) were studied. The rats were randomly assigned to four groups: group I served as a control and was treated with simple ointment base, group II was treated with ASE ointment, group III was treated with ASO ointment and group IV (reference group; Ref) was treated with a reference drug "Cytolcentella® cream". Phytochemical screening showed that total phenols (215 ± 3.5 mg GAE/g) and flavonoids (172.4 ± 3.1 mg QE/g) were higher in the ASO than the ASE group. The results of the antioxidant properties showed that ASO exhibited the highest DPPH free radical scavenging potential (IC50 = 0.136 ± 0.07 mg/mL), FRAP test (IC50 = 0.013 ± 0.006 mg/mL), ABTS test (IC50 = 0.52 ± 0.03 mg/mL) and total antioxidant capacity (IC50 = 0.34 ± 0.06 mg/mL). In the wound healing study, topical application of ASO performed the fastest wound-repairing process estimated by a chromatic study, percentage wound closure, fibrinogen level and oxidative damage status, as compared to ASE, the Cytolcentella reference drug and the untreated rats. The use of AS extract and oil were also associated with the attenuation of oxidative stress damage in the wound-healing treated rats. Overall, the results provided that AS, particularly ASO, has a potential medicinal value to act as effective skin wound healing agent.Entities:
Keywords: Allium subhirsutum L.; antioxidant potential; inflammatory marker; oxidative stress; wound-healing activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34443463 PMCID: PMC8398921 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26164875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Amounts of total phenolic components, flavonoids, tannins and IC50 for the DPPH scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS antioxidant activity and total antioxidant capacities (TAC) of Allium subhirsutum L. extract and oil. Ascorbic acid was used as standard.
| Samples | Total | Flavonoids a | Tannins a | DPPH a | FRAP a | ABTS a | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 63.8 ± 2.36 | 41.7 ± 3.4 | 387.5 ± 17.2 | 0.20 ± 0.004 | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.45 ± 0.09 |
|
| 215 ± 3.5 | 172.4 ± 3.1 | ND | 0.136 ± 0.07 | 0.013 ± 0.006 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.06 |
|
| — | — | — | 0.118 ± 0.006 | 0.08 ± 0.004 | 0.09 ± 0.09 | 0.124 ± 0.002 |
a: Data represent the mean ± SEM of three experiments; b: mg of gallic acid equivalent/g of dry plant extract; c: mg of quercetin equivalent/g of dry plant extract; d: mg Vitamin C equivalent/g of dry plant extract; ND: not detected; —: not tested.
Figure 1Photographic illustrations of wound healing process in the different experimental groups on 1, 3, 7, 9 and 11 days post-wounding.
Figure 2Effects of Allium subhirsutum L. extract (ASE), Allium subhirsutum L. oil and the reference drug “Cytolcentella®” on the percentage of wound closure in control and treated rats. Data represent the mean ± SEM for six rats. Statistically significant variations are compared as follows: ASE, ASO and Ref treated groups compared to control group. * and ** indicate significant differences when p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 3Effects of Allium subhirsutum L. extract (ASE), Allium subhirsutum L. oil and the reference drug “Cytolcentella®” on fibrinogen level. Data represent the mean ± SEM for six rats. Statistically significant variations are compared as follows: ASE, ASO and Ref treated groups compared to control group: ** and *** indicate significant differences when p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Effects of Allium subhirsutum L. extract (ASE), Allium subhirsutum L. oil and the reference drug “Cytolcentella®” on oxidative stress markers of granulation tissue by estimation of TBARS, CD, AOPPA and CP levels.
| Treatment | TBARS | CD | AOPP | CP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.38 ± 0.138 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 61.37 ± 0.37 |
|
| 1.08 ± 0.09 * | 0.58 ± 0.13 * | 0.23 ± 0.003 | 50.73 ± 1.28 ** |
|
| 0.91 ± 0.37 * | 0.48 ± 0.11 ** | 0.21 ± 0.003 * | 47.63 ± 1.09 ** |
|
| 0.82 ± 0.014 ** | 0.45 ± 0.01 *** | 0.20 ± 0.006 ** | 41.80 ± 1.14 *** |
The oxidative stress marker parameters: TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; CD: conjugated dienes; AOPP: advanced oxidation of protein products; CP: carbonyl protein. Data represent the mean ± SEM for six rats. Statistically significant variations are compared as follows: ASE, ASO and Ref treated groups compared to control group. *, ** and *** indicate significant differences when p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Effects of Allium subhirsutum L. extract (ASE), Allium subhirsutum L. oil and the reference drug “Cytolcentella®” on enzymatic antioxidant profile of granulation tissue by estimation of SOD, CAT and GPx activities.
| Treatment & | SOD | CAT | GPx |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.47 ± 0.29 | 50.50 ± 1.18 | 0.009 ± 0.0006 |
|
| 21.24 ± 2.71 * | 53.07 ± 0.54 * | 0.014 ± 0.0081 ** |
|
| 22.30 ± 3.81 * | 57.50 ± 1.85 ** | 0.028 ± 0.012 *** |
|
| 23.61 ± 0.99 ** | 69.61 ± 1.40 *** | 0.037 ± 0.0003 *** |
The enzymatic antioxidant profile: SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase. Data represent the mean ± SEM for six rats in each group. Statistically significant variations are compared as follows: ASE, ASO and Ref treated groups compared to control group: *, ** and *** indicate significant differences when p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Correlation matrix between phytochemicals, oxidative stress markers, fibrinogen and wound reduction.
| TBARS | CD | AOPP | CP | SOD | CAT | GPx | Fibrinogen | Wound | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters & Groups | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASE | ASO | ASO | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASO | ASE | ASO | |
|
|
| −0.940 | −0.140 | 0.824 | 0.037 | 0.544 | −0.323 | −0.762 | −0.762 | 0.144 | 0.999 * | −0.762 | 0.144 | −0.961 | 0.999 * | 0.16 | −0.55 | −0.28 | −0.87 |
|
| 0.630 | 0.981 | −0.806 | 0.932 | 0.615 | 1.000 * | −0.362 | −0.362 | −0.982 | −0.296 | −0.362 | −0.982 | 0.053 | −0.296 | −0.98 | −0.60 | −0.82 | 0.76 | |
|
| −0.174 | 0.787 | −0.079 | 0.884 | 0.999 * | 0.658 | −0.942 | −0.942 | −0.785 | 0.528 | −0.942 | −0.785 | −0.720 | 0.528 | −0.78 | −0.99 * | −0.97 | 0.00 | |
|
|
| −0.859 | 0.049 | 0.702 | 0.225 | 0.693 | −0.138 | −0.871 | −0.871 | −0.045 | 0.988 | −0.871 | −0.045 | −0.996 | 0.988 | −0.03 | −0.70 | −0.45 | −0.76 |
|
| −0.940 | −0.140 | 0.824 | 0.037 | 0.544 | −0.323 | −0.762 | −0.762 | 0.144 | 0.999 * | −0.762 | 0.144 | −0.961 | 0.999 * | 0.16 | −0.55 | −0.28 | −0.87 | |
Data represent the values obtained by Pearson correlation analysis. * indicate significant differences when p < 0.05.