| Literature DB >> 34440373 |
Raul Juntas Morales1,2, Aurélien Perrin3,4, Guilhem Solé5, Delphine Lacourt3, Henri Pegeot3, Ulrike Walther-Louvier6, Pascal Cintas7, Claude Cances8, Caroline Espil9, Corinne Theze3, Reda Zenagui3, Kevin Yauy3, Elodie Cosset2, Dimitri Renard10, Valerie Rigau11, Andre Maues de Paula12, Emmanuelle Uro-Coste13, Marie-Christine Arne-Bes7, Marie-Laure Martin Négrier14, Nicolas Leboucq15, Blandine Acket7, Edoardo Malfatti16,17, Valérie Biancalana18,19, Corinne Metay20, Pascale Richard20, John Rendu21,22, François Rivier6, Michel Koenig3,4, Mireille Cossée3,4.
Abstract
Diagnosis of myopathies is challenged by the high genetic heterogeneity and clinical overlap of the various etiologies. We previously reported a Next-Generation Sequencing strategy to identify genetic etiology in patients with undiagnosed Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies, Congenital Myopathies, Congenital Muscular Dystrophies, Distal Myopathies, Myofibrillar Myopathies, and hyperCKemia or effort intolerance, using a large gene panel including genes classically associated with other entry diagnostic categories. In this study, we report the comprehensive clinical-biological strategy used to interpret NGS data in a cohort of 156 pediatric and adult patients, that included Copy Number Variants search, variants filtering and interpretation according to ACMG guidelines, segregation studies, deep phenotyping of patients and relatives, transcripts and protein studies, and multidisciplinary meetings. Genetic etiology was identified in 74 patients, a diagnostic yield (47.4%) similar to previous studies. We identified 18 patients (10%) with causative variants in different genes (ACTA1, RYR1, NEB, TTN, TRIP4, CACNA1S, FLNC, TNNT1, and PAPBN1) that resulted in milder and/or atypical phenotypes, with high intrafamilial variability in some cases. Mild phenotypes could mostly be explained by a less deleterious effect of variants on the protein. Detection of inter-individual variability and atypical phenotype-genotype associations is essential for precision medicine, patient care, and to progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of myopathies.Entities:
Keywords: atypical phenotype-genotype associations; deep phenotyping; inter-individual variability; myopathies; next generation sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34440373 PMCID: PMC8392536 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Diagnostic rate and molecular results. (A) Reported in literature versus not reported variants. (B) Variant type. (C) Frequency of pathogenic variants by gene. (D) Rate of confirmed diagnosis according to each phenotype in our study in comparison with scientific literature.
Figure 2Nebulin muscle transcripts analyses for the c.6075+5G>A variant in intron 47. (A) Muscle nebulin transcripts were analyzed by RT-PCR and sequencing from muscle biopsies of the patient harboring the c.6075+5G>A heterozygous variant and from a healthy control. Agarose gel electrophoresis shows the RT-PCR products of nebulin exons 46 to 48 transcripts from the muscle of the patient (Lane 2) and the control (Lane 3). Lane 1 represents the molecular weight marker (100–1000 kb ladder). These analyses showed the presence of three populations of transcripts: a normal product of 415 bases, a smaller transcript (310 bases) corresponding to exon 47 skipping, and a larger fragment (466 bases). This transcript corresponds to the retention of 51 nucleotides in intron 47 due to the inactivation of the WT splice site and the activation of a cryptic donor splice site in intron 47 (green gt). (B) Diagram of the splicing pattern in muscle patient. NEB exons are shown as boxes. The splicing pattern of the WT RNA is schematically shown in black color and other mutated transcripts in red (exon 47 skipping) and green (aberrant exon 47 skipping).
Clinical features, muscle MRI and histopathological investigations in patients with new or very unusual phenotype/genotype associations.
| Patient Sex, Age/ Age at Onset | Clinical Features | CK | Muscle Biopsy | Muscle MRI | Family History | Genetic Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Neonatal hypotonia | N | Type I fiber predominance. | ND | Sporadic | c.3557C>T; p.(Ala1186Val) |
|
| Pierre Robin sequence (micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate), scoliosis | N | Type I fiber atrophy | Normal | Sporadic | c.4927+2T>A |
|
| Asymptomatic CK elevation | x20 | Some necrotic fibers | Normal | Sporadic | c.889G>A; p.(Ala297Thr) |
|
| Slowly progressive axial weakness with camptocormia | N | Abnormal myofibrillar network | Paravertebral VL, AB, AM, SM, GM, SO | Sporadic | c.30_31insGCA; p.(Ala11dup) |
|
| Neonatal hypotonia with feeding difficulties and respiratory insufficiency | N | Non-specific myopathic pattern with type 1 fiber predominance and mild myofibrillar disorganization | Upper and lower limbs atrophy. No fat tissue replacement | AR (deceased affected brother) | c.2970G>A; p.(Trp990*) |
|
| Neonatal hypotonia, feeding difficulties, respiratory insufficiency | N | Non-specific myopathic pattern with type 1 fiber predominance | Tongue | Pauci symptomatic father carries the variant | c.2447T>G; p.(Leu816Arg) |
|
| Bilateral calf and left tibialis anterior atrophy | N | Excessive internal nuclei. Minicores with NADH technique | Bilateral GM and | AD | del <11-18> exons |
|
| Very mild proximal weakness | N | Excessive internal nuclei resembling centronuclear myopathy. | Normal | Adopted child | c.51437-4_51444del |
|
| Proximal and axial weakness | N | Excessive internal nuclei resembling centronuclear myopathy. | Bilateral SO and | Sporadic | c.65575+2T>G |
|
| Mild proximal and axial weakness | x2 | Excessive internal nuclei | N.D | Affected twin sister | c.106531G>C; p.(Ala35511Pro) |
|
| Isolated tibialis anterior weakness | N | Pathological fiber size variation. Excessive internal nuclei | Bilateral TA and GM in both patients | AR | c.8860delG |
|
| Isolated tibialis anterior weakness | N | Pathological fiber size variation. Absence of rods | Bilateral TA and | Sporadic | c.21790G>C p.(Arg7264His) |
|
| Axial and proximal weakness | N | Excessive internal nuclei | Bilateral SM, BF, SO | Sporadic (Consang) | del <8-9> homozygous exons |
|
| Neonatal hypotonia | N | Excessive internal nuclei | Bilateral GMax, AM, SM, BF, TA, SO, P | Sporadic | c.200A>G; p.(His67Arg) |
|
| Lower limb-girdle muscular dystrophy | x20 | Non-specific dystrophic pattern | Bilateral VL, AM, AB, SM, ST, GM | AR | c.6617C>T; p.(Thr2206Met) Homozygous |
AD: Autosomal Dominant; AR: Autosomal recessive; N: Normal. VL: Vastus lateralis; VM: Vastus medialis; AM: Adductor magnus; AB: Adductor brevis; ST: Semitendinosus; SM: Semimembranosus; BF: Rectus femoris; GMax: Gluteus maximus; GM: Gastrocnemius medialis; TA: Tibialis anterior; P: Peroneus; SO: Soleus; Consang: consanguinity. ND: Not done.
Figure 3Clinical features of patients with new genotype/phenotype associations: Severe scoliosis in patient I111 aged 5 years with FLNC variant (A). Tongue fatty replacement inpatient I164 (B1) and his father (B2) with CACNA1S variant. Hanging big toe and bilateral tibialis anterior and soleus fatty replacement inpatient I76 with two NEB variants (C, D). Patient I152 with LGMD phenotype and homozygous RYR1 variant with severe quadriceps atrophy (E), fatty replacement of quadriceps, adductors, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius muscles in muscular weighted T1 MRI (F) and dystrophic pattern in muscular biopsy (G, H). The black arrow shows fatty replacement and the blue arrow, fibrosis.
Figure 4Alignment of NEB repeat domains The figure represents the alignment of selected NEB repeats, with conserved residues highlighted in yellow (and/or gray). Residues are indicated by the single-letter amino acid code. “Mutated” residues identified inpatient I112 (p.(Asp7264His)=D7264H, in repeat 201), patients I76,77 (p.(Ser7310Pro)=S7310P, in repeat 202) and patient I173 (p.(Tyr1680Cys)=Y1680C, in repeat 43) are highlighted in purple. “Mutated” residues from previously reported NEB patients with missense variants are highlighted in cyan/blue (references on the right). Corresponding “mutant” residues (single-letter amino acid code) are indicated at the top of the figure. The figure shows that almost all pathogenic missense variants cluster either at the conserved residues of the repeat motif (DX2(E/D)X4KX6(S/N)X3YK) or at 3 specific non-conserved positions for Proline “mutants” (P, at the top of the figure, and which are notorious fold disruptive mutants).
Figure 5Structure prediction of the p.(Ala297Thr) variant. Based on the 6BNO PDB structures [25] the 297 Alanine residue was mutated in Threonine with the fold X algorithm [26] on YASARA software [27]. The p.(Ala297Thr) variant is predicted by fold X to induce a shift of Lysine 326 and Lysine 328, due to the size and polarity of the mutant threonine side chain. Lysine residues 326 and 328 are shown in dark blue, while Ala297 (left panel) was shown in grey and Threonine 297 (right panel) in yellow. The molecular surface is colored in a green cloud.
Figure 6Proposed approach to identify new genotype/phenotype associations.