| Literature DB >> 34436293 |
Oron Goldstein1, Edna Ayerim Mandujano-Tinoco1,2, Tom Levy3, Shani Talice1, Tal Raveh3, Orly Gershoni-Yahalom1, Ayelet Voskoboynik3, Benyamin Rosental1.
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms that sustain immunological nonreactivity is essential for maintaining tissue in syngeneic and allogeneic settings, such as transplantation and pregnancy tolerance. While most transplantation rejections occur due to the adaptive immune response, the proinflammatory response of innate immunity is necessary for the activation of adaptive immunity. Botryllus schlosseri, a colonial tunicate, which is the nearest invertebrate group to the vertebrates, is devoid of T- and B-cell-based adaptive immunity. It has unique characteristics that make it a valuable model system for studying innate immunity mechanisms: (i) a natural allogeneic transplantation phenomenon that results in either fusion or rejection; (ii) whole animal regeneration and noninflammatory resorption on a weekly basis; (iii) allogeneic resorption which is comparable to human chronic rejection. Recent studies in B. schlosseri have led to the recognition of a molecular and cellular framework underlying the innate immunity loss of tolerance to allogeneic tissues. Additionally, B. schlosseri was developed as a model for studying hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, and it provides further insights into the similarities between the HSC niches of human and B. schlosseri. In this review, we discuss why studying the molecular and cellular pathways that direct successful innate immune tolerance in B. schlosseri can provide novel insights into and potential modulations of these immune processes in humans.Entities:
Keywords: Botryllus schlosseri; allorecognition; immune modulation; immune rejection; immune tolerance; innate immunity; stem-cell transplantation; tunicates
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34436293 PMCID: PMC8398012 DOI: 10.3390/md19080454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1The anatomy of B. schlosseri and its different levels of naturally occurring immune responses. (A) Diagram of the tunicate larvae tadpole phase showing the nerve cord and the notochord. (B) Diagram and live imaging of the ventral view of a zooid (Z) and primary bud (BUD), embedded within a tunic (TUN) and connected with vasculature (V), which terminates in ampullae (AMP). The zooid has a branchial sac conformed by the endostyle (END), stigmata (S), cell islands (CI), digestive system (DS), and heart (H). (C) Diagram showing the “takeover” phase in the weekly cycle of zooid regeneration mediated by noninflammatory programmed cell removal of the resorbing old zooid. (D) Live imaging of two B. schlosseri colonies undergoing fusion (arrows show fused vasculature (top)) and rejection (arrows show points of rejection (POR) (bottom)). (E) Live imaging from the allogeneic resorption process, where one colony is the “loser” (which is resorbed), while the other is the “winner”, demonstrating normal developmental stages. (A,C) were created using BioRender; (B,D) were reproduced with permission from [17], Springer Nature Limited, Berlin, Germany, 2018; (E) was reproduced with permission from [16], National Academy of Sciences, 2016.
Figure 2Transplantation in vivo using exogenous labeling in B. schlosseri. (A) Two colonies differentially labeled with CFSE (green) and CellTracker Deep Red, prior to fusion. (B) Fused colonies through the blood vessel and exchanged allogeneic cells can be seen in the confocal image of the live colonies. The transparent body of B. schlosseri is used to follow transplantation in vivo. (C) Transplanted allogeneic cells in a developing secondary bud, followed in a live colony. (D) Transplanted HSCs (exogenous lipophilic dye DiD, red) in the endostyle stem-cell niche in live animals. Bars = 200 µm. (E) Measurement by flow cytometry of transplanted allogeneic cell abundance 3 weeks after transplantation; average and SD of three pairs of touching animals without response, rejecting animals, and fused colonies. This shows the ability of measurement of transplantation success or modulation. (A,B,D) were reproduced with permission from [17], Springer Nature Limited, 2018; (C) was reproduced with permission from [16], National Academy of Sciences, 2016.