| Literature DB >> 34436055 |
Bakr Ahmed Taha1, Norazida Ali1, Nurfarhana Mohamad Sapiee1, Mahmoud Muhanad Fadhel1, Ros Maria Mat Yeh1, Nur Nadia Bachok1, Yousif Al Mashhadany2, Norhana Arsad1.
Abstract
Understanding environmental information is necessary for functions correlated with human activities to improve healthcare quality and reduce ecological risk. Tapered optical fibers reduce some limitations of such devices and can be considerably more responsive to fluorescence and absorption properties changes. Data have been collected from reliable sources such as Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. In this narrative review, we have summarized and analyzed eight classes of tapered-fiber forms: fiber Bragg grating (FBG), long-period fiber grating (LPFG), Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), photonic crystals fiber (PCF), surface plasmonic resonance (SPR), multi-taper devices, fiber loop ring-down technology, and optical tweezers. We evaluated many issues to make an informed judgement about the viability of employing the best of these methods in optical sensors. The analysis of performance for tapered optical fibers depends on four mean parameters: taper length, sensitivity, wavelength scale, and waist diameter. Finally, we assess the most potent strategy that has the potential for medical and environmental applications.Entities:
Keywords: Bragg grating; microstructure; optical sensors; refractive index sensor; tapered optical fiber
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34436055 PMCID: PMC8391612 DOI: 10.3390/bios11080253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the tapered fiber standard [56].
Studies analysis for categorizes tapered-fiber forms.
| Tapered Method | Taper Length | Sensitivity | RI Scale OR | Waist Diameter | Publishing | Application | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity | Quality | |||||||
| FBG | 100 μm | 0.90, −38.49 pm/MPa | 0.7250, 0.9980 | 30 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Temperature and pressure | [ |
| FBG | 10 mm | 1129.44 pm/με | NA | 90 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Temperature and strain | [ |
| FBG | 800 μm | 459.974 nm/RIU | 1.3540–1.3810 | 60 μm | × | ✓ | Biological, medical, and chemical | [ |
| FBG | 780 μm | 269.76 dB/RIU | 1.3330–1.4060 | 54 μm | × | ✓ | Temperature | [ |
| LPFG | 619.24 μm | 45.87 pm/°C | 1.33–1.37 | 44.81 μm | × | ✓ | Temperature | [ |
| LPFG | 730 μm | 8188 nm/RIU | 1.33–1.34 | 12 μm | × | ✓ | Biological and chemical | [ |
| MZI | ∼35.7 μm | ∼8239 pm/MPa | 1.3241–1.3280 | 24 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Temperature and pressure | [ |
| MZI | 350 μm | 28 nm/vol | 1.3645 | 55 μm | × | ✓ | Ethanol concentration | [ |
| MZI | 625 mm | 213.235–215.294 nm/RIU | 0.089 | 65 mm | × | × | Temperature | [ |
| LPFG | 2.3 mm | 1.82 pm/με–8.17 pm/με | Wavelength shifting 1539.4 nm to 1541.2 nm, | 62.5 mm | × | × | Temperature and strain | [ |
| MZI | 4 mm | ∼4202 nm/RIU | 1.3241–1.3280 | 95 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Temperature | [ |
| SPR | 1.25 mm | 3.2 × 105 RIU | 1.333–1.403 | 48 μm | × | ✓ | Biochemical and biomolecular | [ |
| SPR | 25 mm | 18 nm/RIU | 1.3324–1.4254 | 15 μm | × | × | Biological and chemical | [ |
| PCF | ∼2 cm | 1600 nm/RIU | 1.3333–1.3577 | 61 μm top | ✓ | ✓ | Biochemical and biomolecular | [ |
| PCF | 29 mm | 1529 nm/RIU | 1.3355–1.413 | 71.7 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Environments, biomolecules | [ |
| Multi- devices | 550 μm | 261.9 nm/RIU | 1.3333–1.3737 | 52 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Biological and chemical | [ |
| Multi- devices | 17.8 mm | −342.815 dB/RIU | 1.33–1.37 | 29.2 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Biochemical and environments | [ |
| Loop ring-down | 8 mm | 0.045 ns−1RIU−1 | 1.3347–1.3721 | 17 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Medical pharmaceuticals, | [ |
| Loop ring-down | 795 μm | −3128.954 μs/RIU | 3330–1.3682 | 65 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Biochemistry | [ |
| Loop ring-down | 782 μm | −388.581 μs/RIU | 1.335–1.375 | 28 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Industrial processing and | [ |
| Multi- devices | 3 mm | 500.6 nm/RIU | 1.333 to 1.411 | 17 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Chemical and biological | [ |
| Optical tweezer | 200 μm | NA | NA | 1 μm | ✓ | ✓ | Particle and single-cell microscopy | [ |
| Optical tweezer | 20 μm | NA | 1.33–1.40 | 2.5 μm | × | × | Biomedical | [ |
Figure 2Taxonomy of literature research on tapered optic fiber.
Figure 3Tapered fiber optic based on FBG structures. (a) Illustration of hybrid S-taper/FBG structure [62]. (b) Illustration of cascaded S-taper/FBG structure [63]. (c) Illustration of Fabry–Perot/tapered FBG structure [70]. (d) Illustration of long tapered fiber/array of FBG structure [71,72].
Figure 4Tapered fiber optic based on long-period fiber grating (LPFG) structure [75].
Figure 5Tapered fiber based on Mach–Zehnder (MZI) structures. (a) Illustration of tapered based on single cavity [82]. (b) Illustration of tapered based on double air cavities [87]. (c) Illustration of tapered based on air cavity and spot [90]. (d) Illustration tapered based on single air cavity/channel [91].
Figure 6Tapered fiber based on photonic crystals fiber (PCF) [94].
Figure 7Tapered fiber optic based on surface plasmonic resonance (SPR) [105].
Figure 8Tapered fiber optic based on multi-taper devices [108].
Figure 9Tapered fiber optic based on fiber loop ring-down (FLRD) [115].
Figure 10Tapered fiber optic based on optical tweezer structures [122].
Shows the challenges of tapered fiber techniques.
| Tapered Method | Challenges |
|---|---|
| Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) | • Some spectra of reflection overlapped. |
| Long-period fiber grating (LPFG) | • The spectrum is limiting. |
| Mach–Zehnder (MZI) | • Spectral band-width is limited. |
| Photonic crystals (PC) | • The samples given are limited. |
| Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) | • The life of the sensitive layer controls the lifetime of the device. |
| Multi-taper devices | • Measured refractive index range is limited. |
| Fiber loop ring-down technology | • The samples given are limited. |
| Optical tweezers | • Obtain an analytical formula for the output light field is difficult. |