| Literature DB >> 35408323 |
Zidan Gong1, Yisong Lei1, Ziwen Wang1, Jie Zhang1, Zeji Sun1, Yuyao Li1, Jianhao Huang1, Chichiu Chan2, Xia Ouyang1,3.
Abstract
Copper ion is closely associated with the ecosystem and human health, and even a little excessive dose in drinking water may result in a range of health problems. However, it remains challenging to produce a highly sensitive, reliable, cost-effective and electromagnetic-interference interference-immune device to detect Cu2+ ion in drinking water. In this paper, a taper-in-taper fiber sensor was fabricated with high sensitivity by mode-mode interference and deposited polyelectrolyte layers for Cu2+ detection. We propose a new structure which forms a secondary taper in the middle of the single-mode fiber through two-arc discharge. Experimental results show that the newly developed fiber sensor possesses a sensitivity of 2741 nm/RIU in refractive index (RI), exhibits 3.7 times sensitivity enhancement when compared with traditional tapered fiber sensors. To apply this sensor in copper ions detection, the results present that when the concentration of Cu2+ is 0-0.1 mM, the sensitivity could reach 78.03 nm/mM. The taper-in-taper fiber sensor exhibits high sensitivity with good stability and mechanical strength which has great potential to be applied in the detection of low Cu2+ ions in some specific environments such as drinking water.Entities:
Keywords: Cu2+ detection; interferometric; optical fiber sensor; refractive index; taper-in-taper
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408323 PMCID: PMC9002768 DOI: 10.3390/s22072709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Schematic structure of the taper-in-taper fiber sensor; (b) The tapering process.
Figure 2(a) The experiment setup; (b) Chitosan/PAA polyelectrolyte film coating process.
Tapered fiber sensors with various diameters of first and second taper waist.
| Sensor No. | Diameter of the First Taper Waist (μm) | Diameter of the Second Taper Waist (μm) | Second Taper Length (μm) | Second Taper Waist Length (μm) | Second Taper Ratio | Sensor Total Length (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a-1 | 30 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| a-2 | 40 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| a-3 | 50 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| a-4 | 60 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| b-1 | 40 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| b-2 | 40 | 25 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| b-3 | 40 | 30 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| b-4 | 40 | 35 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
Figure 3The influence of (a) the first taper waist diameter and (b) the second waist diameter on sensitivity performance of the taper-in-taper fiber sensor.
Tapered fiber sensors with different second taper ratios.
| Sensor No. | Diameter of the First Taper Waist (μm) | Diameter of the Second Taper Waist (μm) | Second Taper Length (μm) | Second Taper Waist Length (μm) | Second Taper Ratio | Sensor Length (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c-1 | 40 | 20 | 600 | 2000 | 0.3 | 6600 |
| c-2 | 40 | 20 | 700 | 2000 | 0.35 | 6700 |
| c-3 | 40 | 20 | 800 | 2000 | 0.4 | 6800 |
| c-4 | 40 | 20 | 900 | 2000 | 0.45 | 6900 |
| c-5 | 40 | 20 | 1000 | 2000 | 0.5 | 7000 |
Figure 4Influence of the second taper ratio on sensitivity performance of the taper-in-taper fiber sensor.
Figure 5(a) Microscope view of the developed sensor; (b) Transmission spectra and its (c) FFT spectrum.
Figure 6RI testing result of the taper-in-taper fiber sensor: (a) Wavelength shift; (b) Linear fitting result.
Figure 7Linear fitting results of two traditional tapered sensors: (a) sensor with the waist diameter of a 40 μm and (b) sensor with the waist diameter of 20 μm.
Figure 8Linear fitting result of (a) the tape-in-taper fiber sensor with the second taper waist diameter of 25 μm and (b) the single taper fiber sensor with the taper waist diameter of 25 μm.
Figure 9Testing on cross-sensitivity of temperature: (a) Wavelength shift and (b) its linear fitting result.
Comparison with other published wavelength-modulated RI sensors.
| Refs. | Sensing Principle | RI Sensitivity (RIU) | Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | MZI-taper | 1.333–1.337 | 1905.7 |
| [ | MZI-taper | 1.360–1.385 | 2109.7 |
| [ | MZI | 1.33–1.42 | −333.8 |
| [ | MZI-taper | 1.36–1.42 | 108.07 |
| Our work | MZI-taper | 1.33300–1.40169 | 2471 |
Figure 10Detection results in various Cu2+ concentrations: (a) Wavelength shift and (b) its linear fitting result.
Figure 11Temperature sensitivity of the functionalized fiber optic sensor.