Literature DB >> 34432383

Natural history and progression of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: insights from ATTR-ACT.

Jose Nativi-Nicolau1, Daniel P Judge2, James E Hoffman3, Balarama Gundapaneni4, Denis Keohane5, Marla B Sultan5, Martha Grogan6.   

Abstract

AIMS: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, fatal disorder that remains underdiagnosed. The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) was the first large clinical trial to include both wild-type (ATTRwt) and hereditary (ATTRv) patients. A description of the natural history of ATTR-CM, utilizing data from placebo-treated patients in ATTR-ACT, will provide a greater understanding of presentation and progression of ATTR-CM and may aid in disease awareness, earlier diagnosis and treatment monitoring. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Changes in clinical endpoints (mortality, cardiovascular [CV]-related hospitalizations, 6-min walk test [6MWT] distance and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) from baseline to Month 30 in the 177 patients (134 ATTRwt, 43 ATTRv) who received placebo in ATTR-ACT were assessed. ATTRwt patients tended to have less severe disease at baseline. Over the duration of ATTR-ACT, there were 76 (42.9%) all-cause deaths, and 107 (60.5%) patients had a CV-related hospitalization. There was a lower proportion of all-cause deaths in ATTRwt (49, 36.6%) than ATTRv (27, 62.8%). There was a similar, steady decline in mean (SD) 6MWT distance from baseline to Month 30 in ATTRwt (93.9 [93.7] m) and ATTRv (89.1 [107.2] m) patients. The decline in mean (SD) KCCQ-OS score was less severe in ATTRwt (13.8 [20.7]) than ATTRv (21.0 [26.4]) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ATTR-CM experience a severe, progressive disease. In ATTR-ACT, placebo-treated patients with ATTRv, compared with ATTRwt, had more severe disease at baseline, and their disease progressed more rapidly as shown by mortality, hospitalizations and quality of life over time.
© 2021 Pfizer Inc. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Hereditary; Progression; Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy; Variant; Wild-type

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34432383      PMCID: PMC8497209          DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2055-5822


Introduction

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR‐CM) is caused by the accumulation of wild‐type (ATTRwt) or variant (ATTRv) transthyretin amyloid fibrils in the myocardium, leading to cardiomyopathy and symptoms of heart failure. , , Onset of ATTRwt is typically later in life (>60 years of age) with the large majority of patients being male. In contrast, symptom onset in patients with ATTRv can occur at a younger age. , , ATTR‐CM is a progressive, fatal disease, but it remains both underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed, and its prevalence remains unknown. In studies in older patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, as many as 15% of patients had evidence of previously undiagnosed ATTRwt. , , Median survival for patients with ATTR‐CM varies with respect to genotype and disease stage at diagnosis. , Without treatment, survival has been reported as approximately 2.5 years for patients with ATTRv caused by the Val122Ile mutation , , and 3.6 years for patients with ATTRwt. , Greater awareness of ATTR‐CM, and what to expect during the course of disease, could aid earlier diagnosis and improve patient management and treatment outcomes. The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR‐ACT) was the first large clinical trial to include both patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv and represents one of the largest, and longest, collections of natural history data in patients with ATTR‐CM. Patients were enrolled in ATTR‐ACT for up to 30 months, providing a detailed assessment of patients over a meaningful period of time. Following on from prior publications showing the efficacy of tafamidis in patients with ATTR‐CM, in both patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv, this analysis aims to describe the natural history of ATTR‐CM utilizing data from placebo‐treated patients in ATTR‐ACT.

Methods

Trial design and patients

ATTR‐ACT was a Phase 3, multicentre, international, three‐arm, parallel‐design, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized study (ATTR‐ACT) for which the design has been previously published (NCT01994889). , Briefly, those eligible to enrol were patients aged ≥18 and ≤90 years with ATTR‐CM defined by the presence of either ATTRv or ATTRwt and a medical history of heart failure. The trial was approved by the independent review boards or ethics committee at each participating site and was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All patients provided written informed consent. This is the largest published clinical trial of placebo‐treated patients with ATTR‐CM to date. This analysis describes those patients who received placebo during the 30 months of the trial.

Clinical evaluations and statistical analyses

Clinical evaluations in ATTR‐ACT included all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV)‐related mortality, CV‐related hospitalizations, functional capacity (assessed by 6‐min walk test [6MWT] distance), health status and quality of life (assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ‐OS] score), changes in N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function (interventricular septal wall thickness, left ventricular [LV] posterior wall thickness, LV ejection fraction, LV stroke volume and LV strain). As prespecified in the study protocol, 6MWT distance and KCCQ‐OS score were assessed at baseline and every 6 months for the duration of the trial. NT‐proBNP was assessed at baseline and at Month 12 and Month 30. Echocardiographic measures were assessed at baseline and at Months 6, 18 and 30. Vital status was collected for every patient at Month 30. Heart transplant and implantation of a cardiac mechanical assist device were counted as death/mortality for this description; actual deaths and heart transplants are also shown separately. This is a descriptive analysis of the changes in clinical endpoints from baseline to Month 30 in patients who received placebo. Clinical endpoints are also described in patients by genotype (ATTRwt compared with ATTRv) and NYHA class at baseline (Class I and II compared with Class III). Some data on the effect of treatment with tafamidis (compared with placebo) on these outcomes have been previously published. ,

Results

Patient characteristics at baseline

A total of 177 patients received placebo; the majority were male, with a mean age of 74 years (Table ). Genotypes of the 43 patients with ATTRv were Val122Ile (23 patients [53.5%]); Thr60Ala (6 [14.0%]); Val30Met (6 [14.0%]); Ile68Leu (4 [9.3%]); and Asp18Glu, Glu54Leu, Glu89Gln, and Pro24Ser (one patient each [2.3%]). At baseline, patients with ATTRwt tended to be older, but with less severe disease, as shown by the smaller proportion of patients in NYHA Class III and longer mean 6MWT distance (Table ). In contrast, KCCQ‐OS scores and NT‐proBNP levels were similar in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv. Patients with ATTRwt tended to be more likely to have atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, sleep apnoea syndrome and Type 2 diabetes mellitus at enrolment than patients with ATTRv. The majority of patients were receiving diuretics at baseline (69.5% of patients), although use of beta blockers (29.9%) and agents acting on the renin‐angiotensin system (27.1%) was less because they are poorly tolerated or considered harmful in patients with ATTR‐CM.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline

ATTRwt (n = 134)ATTRv (n = 43)
Age, years
Mean (SD)74.9 (6.0)71.4 (8.1)
Median75.073.0
Min, max57, 8951, 86
Sex, n (%)
Male128 (95.5)29 (67.4)
Female6 (4.5)14 (32.6)
Race, n (%)
White124 (92.5)22 (51.2)
Black5 (3.7)21 (48.8)
Asian5 (3.7)0
BMI, mean (SD)26.6 (3.6)25.4 (5.8)
mBMI a , mean (SD)1085.9 (180.2)1005.6 (225.1)
NYHA class, n (%)
I11 (8.2)2 (4.7)
II79 (59.0)22 (51.2)
III44 (32.8)19 (44.2)
6MWT distance (metres), mean (SD)366.7 (126.2)311.2 (117.1)
KCCQ‐OS score, mean (SD)65.1 (21.3)68.4 (23.1)
NT‐proBNP (pg/mL), mean (SD)3826.3 (2840.2)3905.4 (3384.2)
Comorbidities b , n (%)
Atrial fibrillation71 (53.0)18 (41.9)
Hypertension61 (45.5)23 (53.5)
Hyperlipidaemia44 (32.8)14 (32.6)
Cardiac failure, congestive38 (28.4)11 (25.6)
Chronic kidney disease31 (23.1)10 (23.3)
Coronary artery disease35 (26.1)5 (11.6)
Osteoarthritis32 (23.9)7 (16.3)
Benign prostatic hyperplasia30 (22.4)7 (16.3)
Sleep apnoea syndrome32 (23.9)4 (9.3)
Gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease26 (19.4)6 (14.0)
Gout21 (15.7)4 (9.3)
Constipation19 (14.2)5 (11.6)
Insomnia17 (12.7)6 (14.0)
Hypothyroidism15 (11.2)6 (14.0)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus19 (14.2)0
Dyspnoea13 (9.7)6 (14.0)
Carpal tunnel syndrome15 (11.2)3 (7.0)
Fatigue15 (11.2)3 (7.0)
Echocardiography measures, mean (SD)
IVST, mm16.1 (3.3)16.5 (4.1)
LV posterior wall thickness, mm16.6 (3.9)17.0 (4.8)
LV ejection fraction, %48.9 (8.7)47.9 (11.3)
LV stroke volume, mL46.5 (16.4)40.8 (17.9)
Circumferential mid‐global strain, %−17.2 (10.0)−15.9 (8.5)
Radial mid‐global strain, %18.6 (10.8)14.9 (9.0)
Global longitudinal strain, %−9.6 (3.6)−8.6 (3.6)

Some demographic data have been previously published.

6MWT, 6‐minute walk test; ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; BMI, body mass index; IVST, interventricular septal wall thickness; KCCQ‐OS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary; LV, left ventricular; mBMI, modified body mass index; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, standard deviation.

mBMI is calculated by multiplying the BMI [weight (kg)/height (m2)] by serum albumin concentration (g/L).

Comorbidities present at enrolment in >10% of all patients.

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline Some demographic data have been previously published. 6MWT, 6‐minute walk test; ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; BMI, body mass index; IVST, interventricular septal wall thickness; KCCQ‐OS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary; LV, left ventricular; mBMI, modified body mass index; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, standard deviation. mBMI is calculated by multiplying the BMI [weight (kg)/height (m2)] by serum albumin concentration (g/L). Comorbidities present at enrolment in >10% of all patients.

Mortality and hospitalizations

In total, there were 76 (42.9%) all‐cause deaths, of which 63 (35.6% of all patients) were CV related (Table and Figure ). There was a lower proportion of all‐cause deaths in patients with ATTRwt than in patients with ATTRv (Table and Figure ). There was also a lower proportion of all‐cause deaths in patients with baseline NYHA Class I and II than NYHA Class III (Table and Figure ). CV‐related deaths were also less common in patients with ATTRwt and patients who were NYHA Class I and II (Table and Figure ). Overall, all‐cause mortality was greatest in patients with ATTRv who were NYHA Class III at baseline (78.9%), followed by patients with ATTRwt who were NYHA Class III (54.5%), patients with ATTRv who were NYHA Class I and II (50.0%) and patients with ATTRwt who were NYHA Class I and II (27.8%) (Table ).
Table 2

All‐cause, and CV‐related, mortality in all patients and by genotype and NYHA class at baseline

All‐cause mortalityCV‐related mortality
All patients
n 177177
Mortality, n (%)76 (42.9)63 (35.6)
Deaths72 (40.7)59 (33.3)
Heart transplants4 (2.3)4 (2.3)
Median time to event, monthsNENE
ATTRwt
n 134134
Mortality, n (%)49 (36.6)41 (30.6)
Deaths46 (34.3)38 (28.4)
Heart transplants3 (2.2)3 (2.2)
Median time to event, monthsNENE
ATTRv
n 4343
Mortality, n (%)27 (62.8)22 (51.2)
Deaths26 (60.5)21 (48.8)
Heart transplants1 (2.3)1 (2.3)
Median time to event, months23.528.4
NYHA Class I and I
n 114114
All‐cause mortality, n (%)37 (32.5)32 (28.1)
Deaths33 (28.9)28 (24.6)
Heart transplants4 (3.5)4 (3.5)
Median time to event, monthsNENE
NYHA Class III
n 6363
All‐cause mortality, n (%)39 (61.9)31 (49.2)
Deaths39 (61.9)31 (49.2)
Heart transplants00
Median time to event, months24.128.4

Some data on all‐cause mortality have been previously published. ,

ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; CV, cardiovascular; NE, not estimable; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

Figure 1

All‐cause mortality and CV‐related mortality in all patients. (Some data on all‐cause mortality have been previously published ).

Figure 2

All‐cause mortality by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ).

Figure 3

CV‐related mortality by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline.

Table 3

All‐cause mortality in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv by NYHA class at baseline

ATTRwt (n = 134)ATTRv (n = 43)
NYHA Class I and II
n 9024
All‐cause mortality, n (%)25 (27.8)12 (50.0)
Deaths22 (24.4)11 (45.8)
Heart transplants3 (3.3)1 (4.2)
Median time to event, monthsNENE
NYHA Class III
n 4419
All‐cause mortality, n (%)24 (54.5)15 (78.9)
Deaths24 (54.5)15 (78.9)
Heart transplants00
Median time to event, months28.113.8

Some data in these patients have been previously published.

ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; NE, not estimable; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

All‐cause, and CV‐related, mortality in all patients and by genotype and NYHA class at baseline Some data on all‐cause mortality have been previously published. , ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; CV, cardiovascular; NE, not estimable; NYHA, New York Heart Association. All‐cause mortality and CV‐related mortality in all patients. (Some data on all‐cause mortality have been previously published ). All‐cause mortality by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ). CV‐related mortality by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. All‐cause mortality in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv by NYHA class at baseline Some data in these patients have been previously published. ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; NE, not estimable; NYHA, New York Heart Association. In total, 107 (60.5%) patients had a CV‐related hospitalization, with similar proportions in each genotype and NYHA group (Table ). The frequency of CV‐related hospitalizations per year was greater in patients with ATTRv and in NYHA Class III.
Table 4

Hospitalizations by genotype and by NYHA class at baseline

ATTRwt (n = 134)ATTRv (n = 43)
Patients with CV‐related hospitalizations, n (%)81 (60.4)26 (60.5)
Frequency of CV‐related hospitalizations per year
Mean (SD)0.86 (1.20)0.95 (1.21)
Median0.400.56
Min, max0, 7.230, 5.40

ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; CV, cardiovascular; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, standard deviation.

Hospitalizations by genotype and by NYHA class at baseline ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; CV, cardiovascular; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, standard deviation.

Functional capacity, health status and quality of life and cardiac measures

Functional capacity, as measured by 6MWT distance, declined markedly over time, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) decline in all patients from baseline to Month 30 of 89.7 (105.2) m. The decline was similar in ATTRwt and ATTRv and in NYHA Class I and II and NYHA Class III (Figure ). Health status and quality of life, as assessed by KCCQ‐OS score, also declined markedly over time, with a mean (SD) decline in all patients from baseline to Month 30 of 14.6 (21.4). The decline was slightly less severe in ATTRwt than ATTRv and in NYHA Class I and II than NYHA Class III (Figure ). NT‐proBNP levels increased over the trial in all patients (Figure ). Echocardiography measures worsened over time in all patients, with the worsening of radial and circumferential strain in particular more rapid, and more severe, in patients with ATTRv (Figure ).
Figure 4

Change in 6MWT distance over time by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ).

Figure 5

Change in KCCQ‐OS score over time by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ).

Change in 6MWT distance over time by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ). Change in KCCQ‐OS score over time by (A) genotype and (B) NYHA class at baseline. (Some data in patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv have been previously published ).

Discussion

Patients with ATTR‐CM experience a severe, progressive disease with high mortality and frequent hospitalizations. In ATTR‐ACT, placebo‐treated patients with ATTRv, compared with patients with ATTRwt, had more severe disease at baseline, as measured by NYHA class and functional capacity (as assessed by 6MWT distance). In addition, in patients with ATTRv, disease progressed more rapidly as shown by mortality, decline in health status and quality of life (as assessed by KCCQ‐OS score) and increase in NT‐proBNP levels over time. These data are consistent with prior observational studies in patients with ATTR‐CM, which have demonstrated the poor prognosis of the disease, both for patients with ATTRwt (Table ) and for patients with ATTRv (Table ). , , , , , , As in ATTR‐ACT, observational studies have shown that patients with ATTRv tend to have more severe disease, and poorer survival, than patients with ATTRwt. Collectively, these studies reveal a consistent population of patients with ATTRwt, the majority (>80%) male, aged approximately 75 years, with elevated NT‐proBNP/BNP levels and preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. The approximately one‐third mortality over 30 months in patients with ATTRwt in ATTR‐ACT was also consistent with the approximately one‐quarter to one‐third mortality over 24–48 months in observational studies. , , , , , , There have been fewer studies, with fewer participants, in patients with ATTRv. , , The majority of patients in these studies (67%–76%) were male, with females potentially less likely to be diagnosed with cardiac disease. These studies have also demonstrated the poorer survival in patients with ATTRv, reporting median survival times consistent with the 23.5 months observed in ATTR‐ACT. Together, these data suggest that genotype, along with baseline disease severity, contributes to the prognosis of patients with ATTR‐CM. The decline in KCCQ‐OS score over time in ATTR‐ACT was more severe in patients with ATTRv and NYHA Class III, although the difference was not large and, as with 6MWT distance, the rate of decline was largely consistent across all groups. In patients with ATTRwt, there was a decline of approximately 3.5 points every 6 months (i.e. ~0.6 per month). In patients with ATTRv, there was a decline of approximately 5.5 points each 6 months (i.e. ~0.9 per month). Patients with ATTR‐CM have been shown to have poor overall quality of life and to experience a significant burden of disease with associated financial costs. , , The steady decline in KCCQ‐OS score was consistent with an observational study in patients with ATTR‐CM. This analysis is limited by the fact that ATTR‐ACT, as a clinical trial rather than an observational study, included only patients who met the trial's inclusion criteria, which, as a result, may not have been representative of the general population of patients with ATTR‐CM. Nevertheless, the population in ATTR‐ACT was broadly similar to those in observational studies (Tables and ) with similar demographics, but with a larger proportion of patients in NYHA Class ≥II than most observational studies. Given the clear differences in both mortality and hospitalizations between patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv and between NYHA Class I and II and NYHA Class III, it was notable that there was no difference in the decline in 6MWT distance, despite differences in 6MWT distance at baseline. The rate of decline also appeared consistent over time, with each group experiencing a decline of 25–30 m every 6 months (i.e. ~5 m per month). Decline in 6MWT distance has been suggested as a measure of disease progression. However, it should be noted that there are a number of limitations with extrapolating the decline in one group of patients (the ATTR‐ACT population) to all patients with ATTR‐CM. Furthermore, the rate of decline observed in this analysis represents a group level change in least‐squares mean and cannot necessarily be directly correlated to a specific change in any individual patient, either within the ATTR‐ACT population or in patients with ATTR‐CM more generally. The use of multiple measures will likely provide the clearest assessment of disease progression in patients with ATTR‐CM. Patients with ATTR‐CM experience a severe, progressive disease. A greater understanding of the presentation and progression of ATTR‐CM, together with the differences between patients with ATTRwt and patients with ATTRv, can help guide physicians in what to expect when treating these patients. Poorer outcomes in patients with more severe disease emphasize the need for earlier diagnosis and treatment of patients with ATTR‐CM.

Conflict of interest

JN‐N has received research grants from Akcea, Eidos Therapeutics and Pfizer and consulting fees from Akcea, Alnylam, Eidos Therapeutics and Pfizer. DPJ has received grants and funding for the trial, travel expenses and consultancy fees from Pfizer; consultancy fees from ADRx, Cytokinetics and Tenaya Therapeutics; and clinical trial funding from Array BioPharma and Eidos Therapeutics. JEH reports membership of a speakers bureau for Celgene. BG, DK and MBS are full‐time employees of Pfizer and hold stock and/or stock options. MG reports grants, advisory board and consultancy fees paid to her institution from Alnylam, Eidos Therapeutics, Prothena and Pfizer. Medical writing support was provided by Joshua Fink, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions and was funded by Pfizer.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Pfizer.

Data sharing

Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual anonymized participant data. See https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical‐trials/trial‐data‐and‐results for more information. Table S1. Clinical characteristics and survival in untreated patients with ATTRwt in ATTR‐ACT compared with observational studies in patients with ATTRwt. Table S2. Clinical characteristics and survival in untreated patients with ATTRv in ATTR‐ACT compared with observational studies in patients with ATTRv. Figure S1. LS mean change in NT‐proBNP from baseline at Months 12 and 30. ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; LS, least‐squares; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; SE, standard error. Figure S2. LS mean change in echocardiography measures over time by genotype. ATTRv, variant transthyretin amyloidosis; ATTRwt, wild‐type transthyretin amyloidosis; LS, least‐squares; LV, left ventricular; SE, standard error. Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Design and Rationale of the Phase 3 ATTR-ACT Clinical Trial (Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial).

Authors:  Mathew S Maurer; Perry Elliott; Giampaolo Merlini; Sanjiv J Shah; Márcia Waddington Cruz; Alison Flynn; Balarama Gundapaneni; Carolyn Hahn; Steven Riley; Jeffrey Schwartz; Marla B Sultan; Claudio Rapezzi
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 2.  Transthyretin-related amyloidoses and the heart: a clinical overview.

Authors:  Claudio Rapezzi; Candida Cristina Quarta; Letizia Riva; Simone Longhi; Ilaria Gallelli; Massimiliano Lorenzini; Paolo Ciliberti; Elena Biagini; Fabrizio Salvi; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Prospective evaluation of the morbidity and mortality of wild-type and V122I mutant transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiac Study (TRACS).

Authors:  Frederick L Ruberg; Mathew S Maurer; Daniel P Judge; Steven Zeldenrust; Martha Skinner; Antony Y Kim; Rodney H Falk; Kin N Cheung; Ayan R Patel; Arian Pano; Jeffrey Packman; Donna Roy Grogan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Frederick L Ruberg; Martha Grogan; Mazen Hanna; Jeffery W Kelly; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Natural History of Wild-Type Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Risk Stratification Using a Novel Staging System.

Authors:  Martha Grogan; Christopher G Scott; Robert A Kyle; Steven R Zeldenrust; Morie A Gertz; Grace Lin; Kyle W Klarich; Wayne L Miller; Joseph J Maleszewski; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Screening for Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Everyday Practice.

Authors:  Ronald M Witteles; Sabahat Bokhari; Thibaud Damy; Perry M Elliott; Rodney H Falk; Nowell M Fine; Mariana Gospodinova; Laura Obici; Claudio Rapezzi; Pablo Garcia-Pavia
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 12.035

7.  Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Esther González-López; Maria Gallego-Delgado; Gonzalo Guzzo-Merello; F Javier de Haro-Del Moral; Marta Cobo-Marcos; Carolina Robles; Belén Bornstein; Clara Salas; Enrique Lara-Pezzi; Luis Alonso-Pulpon; Pablo Garcia-Pavia
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Left ventricular amyloid deposition in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Selma F Mohammed; Sultan A Mirzoyev; William D Edwards; Ahmet Dogan; Donna R Grogan; Shannon M Dunlay; Veronique L Roger; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Steven R Zeldenrust; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.035

9.  Clinical characteristics of wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: disproving myths.

Authors:  Esther González-López; Christian Gagliardi; Fernando Dominguez; Cristina Candida Quarta; F Javier de Haro-Del Moral; Agnese Milandri; Clara Salas; Mario Cinelli; Marta Cobo-Marcos; Massimiliano Lorenzini; Enrique Lara-Pezzi; Serena Foffi; Luis Alonso-Pulpon; Claudio Rapezzi; Pablo Garcia-Pavia
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Natural history and progression of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: insights from ATTR-ACT.

Authors:  Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Daniel P Judge; James E Hoffman; Balarama Gundapaneni; Denis Keohane; Marla B Sultan; Martha Grogan
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-08-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Baseline Characteristics and Secondary Medication Adherence Patterns Among Patients Receiving Tafamidis Prescriptions: A Retrospective Analysis Using a National Specialty Pharmacy Dispensing Database.

Authors:  Anuja Roy; Andrew Peterson; Nick Marchant; Jose Alvir; Rahul Bhambri; Jason Lynn; Darrin Benjumea; Sapna Prasad; Alex O'Brien; Yong Chen; Jason Kemner; Bhash Parasuraman
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Natural history and progression of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: insights from ATTR-ACT.

Authors:  Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Daniel P Judge; James E Hoffman; Balarama Gundapaneni; Denis Keohane; Marla B Sultan; Martha Grogan
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 3.  Amyloid seeding as a disease mechanism and treatment target in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Paolo Morfino; Alberto Aimo; Giorgia Panichella; Claudio Rapezzi; Michele Emdin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.654

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.