AIMS: Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) is mostly considered a disease predominantly of elderly male, characterized by concentric LV hypertrophy, preserved LVEF, and low QRS voltages. We sought to describe the characteristics of a large cohort of ATTRwt patients to better define the disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical findings of consecutive ATTRwt patients diagnosed at 2 centres were reviewed. ATTRwt was diagnosed histologically or non-invasively (LV hypertrophy ≥12 mm, intense cardiac uptake at 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy and AL exclusion). Mutations in TTR were excluded in all cases. The study cohort comprised 108 patients (78.6 ± 8 years); 67 (62%) diagnosed invasively and 41 (38%) non-invasively. Twenty patients (19%) were females. An asymmetric hypertrophy pattern was observed in 25 (23%) patients. Mean LVEF was 52 ± 14%, with 39 patients (37%) showing a LVEF < 50%. Atrial fibrillation (56%) and a pseudo-infarct pattern (63%) were the commonest ECG findings. Only 22 patients fulfilled QRS low-voltage criteria while 10 showed LV hypertrophy on ECG. Although heart failure was the most frequent profile leading to diagnosis (68%), 7% of individuals presented with atrioventricular block and 11% were diagnosed incidentally. Almost one third (35; 32%) were previously misdiagnosed. CONCLUSION: The clinical spectrum of ATTRwt is heterogeneous and differs from the classic phenotype: women are affected in a significant proportion; asymmetric LV hypertrophy and impaired LVEF are not rare and only a minority have low QRS voltages. Clinicians should be aware of the broad clinical spectrum of ATTRwt to correctly identify an entity for which a number of disease-modifying treatments are under investigation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) is mostly considered a disease predominantly of elderly male, characterized by concentric LV hypertrophy, preserved LVEF, and low QRS voltages. We sought to describe the characteristics of a large cohort of ATTRwt patients to better define the disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical findings of consecutive ATTRwt patients diagnosed at 2 centres were reviewed. ATTRwt was diagnosed histologically or non-invasively (LV hypertrophy ≥12 mm, intense cardiac uptake at 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy and AL exclusion). Mutations in TTR were excluded in all cases. The study cohort comprised 108 patients (78.6 ± 8 years); 67 (62%) diagnosed invasively and 41 (38%) non-invasively. Twenty patients (19%) were females. An asymmetric hypertrophy pattern was observed in 25 (23%) patients. Mean LVEF was 52 ± 14%, with 39 patients (37%) showing a LVEF < 50%. Atrial fibrillation (56%) and a pseudo-infarct pattern (63%) were the commonest ECG findings. Only 22 patients fulfilled QRS low-voltage criteria while 10 showed LV hypertrophy on ECG. Although heart failure was the most frequent profile leading to diagnosis (68%), 7% of individuals presented with atrioventricular block and 11% were diagnosed incidentally. Almost one third (35; 32%) were previously misdiagnosed. CONCLUSION: The clinical spectrum of ATTRwt is heterogeneous and differs from the classic phenotype: women are affected in a significant proportion; asymmetric LV hypertrophy and impaired LVEF are not rare and only a minority have low QRS voltages. Clinicians should be aware of the broad clinical spectrum of ATTRwt to correctly identify an entity for which a number of disease-modifying treatments are under investigation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Frederick L Ruberg; Martha Grogan; Mazen Hanna; Jeffery W Kelly; Mathew S Maurer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Vincent Algalarrondo; Eve Piekarski; Ludivine Eliahou; Dominique Le Guludec; Michel S Slama; François Rouzet Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Giorgio Treglia; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Francesco Bertagna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Paola A Erba; Raffaele Giubbini; Luca Ceriani; John O Prior; Luca Giovanella; Riemer H J A Slart Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Angelos G Rigopoulos; Muhammad Ali; Elena Abate; Abdel-Rahman Torky; Marios Matiakis; Mammad Mammadov; Hannes Melnyk; Alexander Vogt; Renato de Vecchis; Boris Bigalke; Walter Wohlgemuth; Sophie Mavrogeni; Michel Noutsias Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Isabel Zegri-Reiriz; F Javier de Haro-Del Moral; Fernando Dominguez; Clara Salas; Pablo de la Cuadra; Aresio Plaza; Isabel Krsnik; Esther Gonzalez-Lopez; Pablo Garcia-Pavia Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 4.132