Literature DB >> 34432192

Impact of Insurance Status on Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

David N Hanna1, Muhammad O Ghani1, Andrew Hermina2, Alexander Mina3, Christina E Bailey1, Kamran Idrees1, Deepa Magge4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has shown that underinsured patients are at increased risk of worse health outcomes compared with insured patients. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is largely performed at highly specialized cancer centers and may pose challenges for the underinsured. This study investigates surgical outcomes following CRS-HIPEC for insured and underinsured patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 125 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC between 2013 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups. The insured group was comprised of patients with private insurance at the time of CRS-HIPEC or who obtained it during the follow-up period. The underinsured group consisted of patients with Medicaid, or self-pay. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 102 (82.3%) patients were insured, and 22 (17.7%) patients were underinsured. There were no significant differences in age, medical morbidities, primary tumor characteristics, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, or completion of cytoreduction score between the two groups. The median overall survival (OS) for insured patients was 64.8 months and was 52.9 months for underinsured patients (p = 0.01). Additionally, insured patients had a significantly longer follow-up time. Underinsurance status also was associated with increased hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and higher rate of Clavien-Dindo classification III-IV complications.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study conducted at a large, urban, specialized cancer center, private insurance status was associated with increased overall survival and longer follow-up period. Furthermore, underinsurance status was associated with increased perioperative morbidity.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34432192      PMCID: PMC9015890          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10670-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  25 in total

1.  Primary payer status affects mortality for major surgical operations.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Carlos M Mery; George J Stukenborg; David R Jones; Bruce D Schirmer; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The impact of age and Medicare status on bariatric surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Joshua Langert
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11

3.  Two-thirds of primary care physicians accepted new Medicaid patients in 2011-12: a baseline to measure future acceptance rates.

Authors:  Sandra L Decker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Preoperative delays in the US Medicare population with breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Eric Ross; Yu-Ning Wong; Sameer A Patel; Marcia Boraas; Neal S Topham; Brian L Egleston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Underuse of surgical resection in black patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: location, location, location.

Authors:  Nestor F Esnaola; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Chris Finney; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Completion of therapy by Medicare patients with stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Sharon A Dobie; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Jason A Dominitz; Barbara Matthews; Kevin Billingsley; William Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The effect of health insurance status on the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander A Parikh; Jamie Robinson; Victor M Zaydfudim; David Penson; Martin A Whiteside
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 8.  Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future.

Authors:  Ahmed Dehal; J Joshua Smith; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02

9.  Effect of insurance status on the stage of breast and colorectal cancers in a safety-net hospital.

Authors:  Daniel T Farkas; Arieh Greenbaum; Vinay Singhal; John M Cosgrove
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status.

Authors:  Xiaoling Niu; Lisa M Roche; Karen S Pawlish; Kevin A Henry
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Disparate Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Based on Insurance Status.

Authors:  David N Hanna; Deepa Magge
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Racial Disparities in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Does Aggressive Surgical Treatment Overcome Cancer Health Inequities?

Authors:  Devon C Freudenberger; Xiaoyan Deng; Vignesh Vudatha; Andrea N Riner; Kelly M Herremans; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Leopoldo J Fernandez; Jose G Trevino
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Impact of sociodemographic factors on outcomes in patients with peritoneal malignancies following cytoreduction and chemoperfusion.

Authors:  Adriana Cantos; Emanuel Eguia; Xuanji Wang; Gerard Abood; Lawrence M Knab
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.885

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.