Literature DB >> 25524157

A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

C Clancy1, D P O'Leary2, J P Burke2, H P Redmond2, J C Coffey2, M J Kerin2, E Myers2.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery is oncologically equivalent to open resection, but the impact of conversion is undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcome and predictive factors associated with conversion.
METHOD: A comprehensive search for published studies examining the associated factors and outcome of conversion from laparoscopic to open colorectal cancer resection was performed adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Only randomized control trials and prospective studies were included. Each study was reviewed and the data extracted. Random effects methods were used to combine data.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies, including 5293 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Of these 4391 patients had a completed laparoscopic resection and 902 were converted to an open resection. The average conversion rate of the studies was 17.9 ± 10.1%. Meta-analysis showed completed laparoscopic surgery favoured lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.134, 95% CI 0.047-0.385, P < 0.0001), lower long-term disease recurrence (OR 0.634, 95% CI 0.421-0.701, P < 0.023) and lower overall mortality (OR 0.512, 95% CI 0.417-0.629, P < 0.0001). Factors negatively associated with completion of laparoscopic surgery were male gender (P = 0.011), rectal tumour (P = 0.017), T3/T4 tumour (P = 0.009) and node-positive disease (P = 0.009). Completed laparoscopic surgery was also associated with a lower body mass index (BMI; mean difference -0.93 kg/m(2) , P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that conversion from laparoscopic to open colorectal cancer resection is influenced by patient and tumour characteristics and is associated with an adverse perioperative outcome. Although confounding factors such as advanced tumour stage and elevated BMI are present, unsuccessful laparoscopic surgery appears to be associated with an adverse long-term oncological outcome. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25524157     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  27 in total

1.  [Management of more frequent complications of laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive or always open surgery?].

Authors:  K Ludwig; U Scharlau; S Schneider Koriath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26

3.  Critical appraisal of laparoscopic vs open rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Winson Jianhong Tan; Min Hoe Chew; Angela Renayanti Dharmawan; Manraj Singh; Sanchalika Acharyya; Carol Tien Tau Loi; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

4.  [Laparoscopic rectal resection technique].

Authors:  M Anthuber; B Kriening; M Schrempf; B Geißler; B Märkl; S Rüth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Laparoscopic approach for left-sided T4 colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure, compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Jung Ho Park; Hyoung-Chul Park; Sung Chan Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Jae Hwan Oh; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung Chul Heo; Min Jung Kim; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Does the number of operating specialists influence the conversion rate and outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Nader K Francis; Nathan J Curtis; Louise Crilly; Emma Noble; Tamsin Dyke; Rob Hipkiss; Richard Dalton; Andrew Allison; Emad Salib; Jonathan Ockrim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of Laparoscopic Converted to Open Gastrectomy on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Ni Xie; Jie Chen; Zheng-Yan Li; Bin Bai; Dan Song; Shuai Xu; Xiao-Tian Song; Gang Ji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Body mass index and colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Doleman; K T Mills; S Lim; M D Zelhart; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.

Authors:  Rogier M P H Crolla; Paul G Mulder; George P van der Schelling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Analysis of Early and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Converted Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Primary Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Edgar Furnée; Laura Esposito; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.