Literature DB >> 34428339

Chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Asymmetric Transformations of β-Hydroxyketones.

Simon Hilker1, Daniels Posevins1, C Rikard Unelius2, Jan-E Bäckvall1.   

Abstract

Herein we report on the development and application of chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Asymmetric Transformation (DYKAT) of α-substituted β-hydroxyketones (β-HKs), using Candida antartica lipase B (CALB) as transesterification catalyst and a ruthenium complex as epimerization catalyst. An operationally simple protocol allows for an efficient preparation of highly enantiomerically enriched α-substituted β-oxoacetates. The products were obtained in yields up to 95 % with good diastereomeric ratios.
© 2021 The Authors. Chemistry - A European Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DYKAT; lipase; racemization; ruthenium; β-hydroxyketones

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34428339      PMCID: PMC9293354          DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemistry        ISSN: 0947-6539            Impact factor:   5.020


Asymmetric synthesis remains an important part of organic chemistry, strongly impacting other scientific areas. Various areas of chemical industry have a stable growing demand of optically pure compounds, with the resolution of racemic mixtures still being the preferred method industrially. Ever since the possibility to combine enzymes and transition metals in one‐pot procedures was reported, considerable efforts into combining enzymes and transition metals in catalytic systems have been undertaken. Development of systems combining in situ transition metal‐catalyzed racemization with enzymatic kinetic resolution (KR) has resulted in so‐called dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR), efficiently resolving racemic mixtures of e. g. sec‐alcohols in theoretically quantitative yields, providing convenient access to valuable functionalized alcohols. Further, chemoenzymatic DKR procedures have been successfully applied in the resolution of α‐hydroxyketones or the asymmetric syntheses of diaryl diols. Recently, also systems using organocatalysis or photocatalysis cooperatively with enzyme catalysis or bi‐enzymatical DKR systems have been developed and applied. Chemoenzymatic DYKAT protocols have been developed for the diastereo‐ and enantioselective transformations of diastereomeric mixtures of diols and found application in the synthesis of enantiomerically pure (+)‐solenopsin A. We have previously developed a DYKAT of 1,3‐diols to access enantiomerically pure syn‐1,3‐diacetates combining enzymatic resolution and Ru‐catalyzed epimerization additionally including intramolecular acyl migration in 1,3‐syn‐diol monoacetates (Scheme 1a). Another example includes preparation of γ‐hydroxyketones from 1,4‐diols that takes advantage of a facile dehydrogenation step when employing Ru‐complex Ia together with an acyl donor affording γ‐oxoacetates as products (Scheme 1b).
Scheme 1

Examples of previously reported methods for DYKAT of diols and this work.

Examples of previously reported methods for DYKAT of diols and this work. To date various metal‐based racemization catalysts have been reported to be compatible with enzyme catalysis, including ruthenium‐based complexes. Early DKR systems employed a combination of lipase CALB and Shvo's catalyst (Ia). Park and co‐workers later introduced a new type of RuCl‐complexes with superior racemization properties. The Bäckvall group developed a highly potent RuCl‐complex (II), which has since then found application in various DKR and DYKAT systems.[ , , , ] With the latter catalyst racemization of 1‐phenylethanol takes place at room temperature in minutes.[ , ] Further, this catalyst system suppresses the commonly occurring side reaction of substrate oxidation, which is a common problem with the early DKR systems employing catalyst Ia. Chiral β‐hydroxyketones (β‐HKs) are commonly found in nature, for example as pheromone components of Sitona and Sitophilus weevils.[ , , ] In addition, β‐HKs constitute a class of valuable building blocks, commonly employed in the total synthesis of natural products, i. e. polyketides. We envisioned an effective epimerization mechanism for α‐substituted β‐hydroxyketones 1 with RuCl‐complex II (Scheme 2a), including a [1,5]‐migration of ruthenium hydride species ([Ru]‐H) between the oxygen atoms of the 1,3‐diketone moiety in intermediates int‐A and int‐B as the key step (Scheme 2b). The transformation is proposed to proceed via a non‐chiral intermediate int‐C. It has been previously demonstrated during mechanistic studies on the racemization of sec‐alcohols with RuCl‐complex II that the substrate does not leave the coordination sphere of the metal during the oxidation‐reduction process. In contrast, the use of Ru‐complex I under analogous reaction conditions would lead to an equilibrium where the 1,3‐diketone would readily dissociate from the corresponding [Ru]‐H moiety, which would in turn lead to oxidation of the substrate. Furthermore, an expected reaction rate difference between the enzymatic acylation of syn‐ and anti‐ diastereoisomers of α‐substituted β‐HKs would lead to formation of highly useful diastereomerically enriched β‐oxoacetates as products.
Scheme 2

a) Racemization pathways in the DYKAT of β‐HKs employing Ru‐cat II. b) [1,5]‐Migration of [Ru]‐H as the key step in the racemization process.

a) Racemization pathways in the DYKAT of β‐HKs employing Ru‐cat II. b) [1,5]‐Migration of [Ru]‐H as the key step in the racemization process. We postulated that an increase of the steric demand of the substituent in the α‐position of the β‐HKs would lead to improved diastereoselectivity of the overall process. Initial attempts to obtain a DYKAT of β‐HKs indicated a significant drop in the rate of the enzymatic acylation when α‐substituted 3‐hydroxy‐5‐heptanones were used as substrates compared to that of 2‐hydroxy‐4‐pentanones. Hence, β‐HK 1 a bearing a benzyl substituent in the α‐position was chosen as the standard substrate in the optimization of the reaction conditions (Table 1).
Table 1

Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]

Entry

Ru‐cat [mol %]

CALB [mg/mmol]

solvent [M]

2 a [%][b]

3 a [%][b]

syn‐ 2 a : anti‐ 2 a [c]

ee of anti‐ 2 a [%][c]

1

Ia (2.5)

40

CyH (0.2)

49

8

30 : 70

97

2

Ia (2.5)

80

CyH (0.2)

83

8

30 : 70

97

3

Ia (2.5)

80

THF (0.2)

39

32 : 68

99

4

Ia (2.5)

80

DCE (0.2)

27

30 : 70

99

5

Ia (2.5)

80

tBuOH (0.2)

12

8

23 : 77

99

6

Ia (2.5)

80

PhMe (0.2)

85

10

30 : 70

97

7

Ib (2.5)

80

PhMe (0.2)

81

5

34 : 66

95

8

Ic (2.5)

80

PhMe (0.2)

78

5

38 : 62

95

9

II (5.0)[d]

40

PhMe (0.2)

88

30 : 70

99

10[e]

II (5.0)[d]

40

PhMe (0.2)

95 (90)[f]

35 : 65

99

11[e,g]

II (5.0)[d]

PhMe (0.2)

88

48 : 52

96

[a] Unless otherwise noted reactions were conducted under argon atmosphere in the indicated solvent (1.0 mL) at 80 °C using 1 a (0.2 mmol), p‐ClPhOAc (1.5 equiv), Na2CO3 (1.5 equiv), Ru‐cat (2.5–5 mol%), and CALB (indicated amount). [b] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard. [c] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. [d] Using KOtBu (0.1 M solution in toluene, 5 mol%) as an additive. [e] Using isopropenyl acetate (1.5 equiv) as the acyl donor. [f] Isolated yield. [g] Using lipase PS‐IM (80 mg/mmol) instead of CALB and the reaction time was 64 h. DCE=1,2‐dichloroethane.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a] Entry Ru‐cat [mol %] CALB [mg/mmol] solvent [M] 2 a [%][b] 3 a [%][b] syn‐ 2 a : anti‐ 2 a [c] ee of anti‐ 2 a [%][c] 1 Ia (2.5) 40 CyH (0.2) 49 8 30 : 70 97 2 Ia (2.5) 80 CyH (0.2) 83 8 30 : 70 97 3 Ia (2.5) 80 THF (0.2) 39 32 : 68 99 4 Ia (2.5) 80 DCE (0.2) 27 30 : 70 99 5 Ia (2.5) 80 tBuOH (0.2) 12 8 23 : 77 99 6 Ia (2.5) 80 PhMe (0.2) 85 10 30 : 70 97 7 Ib (2.5) 80 PhMe (0.2) 81 5 34 : 66 95 8 Ic (2.5) 80 PhMe (0.2) 78 5 38 : 62 95 9 II (5.0)[d] 40 PhMe (0.2) 88 30 : 70 99 10[e] II (5.0)[d] 40 PhMe (0.2) 95 (90)[f] 35 : 65 99 11[e,g] II (5.0)[d] PhMe (0.2) 88 48 : 52 96 [a] Unless otherwise noted reactions were conducted under argon atmosphere in the indicated solvent (1.0 mL) at 80 °C using 1 a (0.2 mmol), p‐ClPhOAc (1.5 equiv), Na2CO3 (1.5 equiv), Ru‐cat (2.5–5 mol%), and CALB (indicated amount). [b] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard. [c] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. [d] Using KOtBu (0.1 M solution in toluene, 5 mol%) as an additive. [e] Using isopropenyl acetate (1.5 equiv) as the acyl donor. [f] Isolated yield. [g] Using lipase PS‐IM (80 mg/mmol) instead of CALB and the reaction time was 64 h. DCE=1,2‐dichloroethane. Initially experiments were conducted employing Ru‐complex Ia as the racemization catalyst. p‐Chlorophenyl acetate was chosen as the acyl donor due to the observed increased formation of the undesired diketone 3 a when acyl donors such as vinyl acetates were employed. An enzyme loading of 80 mg/mmol of lipase CALB was found to be necessary for achieving good yield of the desired product 2 a in cyclohexane as the solvent after 20 h at 80 °C. The desired β‐oxoacetate 2 a was formed in 83 % yield, with a moderate diastereomeric ratio (dr) with a syn:anti ratio of 30 : 70 (Table 1, entry 2). High enantiomeric excess (ee) was observed, even though the formation of minor amounts of the undesired enantiomer suggests that epimerization is not sufficiently fast over the whole reaction course. Substrate oxidation to give 3 a as a byproduct in small amounts occurred as a result of acceptorless dehydrogenation of 1 a catalyzed by Ru‐complex Ia. Use of solvents such as THF, DCE or tBuOH in the reaction led to a considerable decrease of the yield of 2 a (Table 1, entries 3–5). Toluene was found to be the best solvent in this transformation (Table 1, entry 6). Screening of other racemization catalysts such as Ru‐catalysts Ib and Ic led to decreased yields of 2 a, as well as lower ee values (Table 1, entries 7–8). To further improve the enantioselectivity of the reaction and suppress formation of the undesired oxidation product 3 a, RuCl‐complex II was tested as a racemization catalyst in this reaction (Table 1, entry 9). Due to the superior epimerization performance of catalyst II, the enzyme loading could be reduced to half while retaining high yield and ee of 2 a. The RuCl‐complex II was also found to be compatible with isopropenyl acetate as the acyl donor (Table 1, entry 10), which facilitated the product isolation. Under these optimized reaction conditions β‐oxoacetate 2 a was obtained in 90 % isolated yield, 99 % ee and a syn : anti ratio of 35 : 65 with no detected formation of 3 a. We also tested the performance of lipase PS‐IM in the DYKAT of 1 a (Table 1, entry 11). Under analogous reaction conditions after 64 h reaction time the β‐oxoacetate 2 a was obtained in 88 % yield, albeit with a decrease of both dr and ee. To gain further insight into the diastereoselectivity of the enzymatic acylation reaction of 1 a, the relative rates of the formation of diastereomers syn‐1 a and anti‐1 a were measured. First, a parallel experiment was carried out using syn‐1 a and anti‐1 a as substrates (Figure 1). In this setting, alcohol anti‐ 1 a undergoes acetylation to furnish anti‐2 a approximately twice as fast as syn‐1 a.
Figure 1

Kinetic resolution (KR) of a) syn‐ 1 a and b) anti‐ 1 a (parallel experiments). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard.

Kinetic resolution (KR) of a) syn‐ 1 a and b) anti‐ 1 a (parallel experiments). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard. Additionally, a competitive KR experiment was run, using compound 1 a with a starting diastereomeric ratio close to 1 : 1 syn : anti (Scheme 3). The faster reacting diastereomer preferentially binds to the enzyme and thereby prevents access of the slower reacting diastereomer, potentially amplifying the diastereoselection. The competitive reaction indicates a relative rate difference of 1 : 3 between syn‐ and anti‐diastereoisomers, based on the observed dr of the product 2 a at low conversion.
Scheme 3

Kinetic resolution (KR) of syn‐ 1 a and anti‐ 1 a (intermolecular competition experiment). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard. [b] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase.

Kinetic resolution (KR) of syn‐ 1 a and anti‐ 1 a (intermolecular competition experiment). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as the internal standard. [b] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. Next, the scope of the newly developed DYKAT reaction was investigated (Scheme 4). Under the previously established optimal reaction conditions (Conditions A), products 2 a–c were obtained in excellent yields, very high enantioselectivity, and moderate dr. However, β‐HK 1 d with n‐butyl substituent in the α‐position led to dr of 45 : 55 (syn : anti) under these reaction conditions. We argued that the rate of enzymatic acylation of 1 d is too fast for an efficient epimerization to occur by [1,5]‐migration of RuH. Hence, we further investigated if an increased diastereomeric ratio of 2 d could be achieved by lowering the enzyme‐to‐catalyst ratio. After an additional screening of reaction conditions (see the Supporting Information) new optimized reaction conditions were established (Conditions B). We observed that decreasing the amount of enzyme in the reaction decreased the yield and increased the reaction time, whereas raising the amount of rutheniumcatalyst to 7.5 mol% and diluting the reaction mixture resulted in high yield of product 2 d with increased dr compared to the reaction with the previously used optimized conditions (Conditions A). The newly optimized reaction conditions (Conditions B) were further applied for substrates 1 b, 1 c, and 1 e in order to achieve higher dr of the corresponding products. Substrate 1 f containing a terminal alkyne moiety afforded the corresponding β‐oxoacetate 2 f in 45 % yield with moderate dr, but with decreased ee of both diastereoisomers. The yields of acetates 2 g and 2 h obtained were low due to their instability under the reaction conditions (they readily underwent elimination reactions to form the corresponding α,β‐unsaturated ketones as side products). Higher enzyme loading and longer reaction times were necessary to achieve efficient DYKAT of the 3‐hydroxy‐5‐heptanone‐derived β‐HKs 1 i–k in good yields. Surprisingly, α‐methyl‐substituted β‐oxoacetate 2 i showed a slight preference for the syn‐diastereomer, in contrast to the previous examples described here. A plausible reason for this preference is the way that the β‐HK adapts to the enzyme pocket, since the methyl substituent is less sterically demanding than the propionyl moiety in 2 i. Introducing additional steric hindrance by creating a quaternary stereogenic center in β‐HK 1 l caused an increased steric demand. Even after prolonged reaction time, β‐oxoacetate 2 l was obtained in low yield, with just marginally better dr than 2 a and decreased ee. Interestingly, cyclic β‐HK 1 m was also found to be compatible with the newly developed DYKAT protocol and afforded the corresponding β‐oxoacetate 2 m in 80 % yield and dr of 40 : 60 (syn : anti).
Scheme 4

Scope of DYKAT of β‐HKs. Unless otherwise noted the reaction was conducted under argon atmosphere in anhydrous toluene (indicated amount) at 80 °C using 1 (0.2 mmol), Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv), Ru‐cat II (indicated amount), KOtBu (0.1 M solution in toluene, indicated amount) and CALB (40 mg/mmol). [a] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. [b] 80 mg/mmol of CALB was used. [c] 120 mg/mmol CALB. [d] Reaction time was 48 h. [e] Reaction time was 70 h. [f] Reaction time was 90 h.

Scope of DYKAT of β‐HKs. Unless otherwise noted the reaction was conducted under argon atmosphere in anhydrous toluene (indicated amount) at 80 °C using 1 (0.2 mmol), Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv), Ru‐cat II (indicated amount), KOtBu (0.1 M solution in toluene, indicated amount) and CALB (40 mg/mmol). [a] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. [b] 80 mg/mmol of CALB was used. [c] 120 mg/mmol CALB. [d] Reaction time was 48 h. [e] Reaction time was 70 h. [f] Reaction time was 90 h. As it was previously demonstrated, Ru‐complex Ia can be used to efficiently reduce ketones to alcohols via transfer hydrogenation by the use of an external alcohol as a hydrogen donor. Herein we disclose a tandem hydrogenation‐DYKAT of 1,3‐diketone 3 a as a one‐pot procedure (Scheme 5). By employing Ru‐complex Ia as the racemization/transfer hydrogenation catalyst, the mono reduction of the 1,3‐diketone moiety in 3 a and the subsequent epimerization and enzymatic acylation of the in situ generated β‐HK, afforded the desired β‐oxoacetate 2 a in 65 % NMR‐yield with high enantiomeric excess.
Scheme 5

Tandem hydrogenation‐DYKAT of 1,3‐diketone 3 a. The reaction was conducted under argon atmosphere in anhydrous toluene (1 mL) at 80 °C using 3 a (0.2 mmol), Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv), Ru‐cat Ia (5 mol%), p‐ClPhOAc (1.5 equiv), alcohol 4 (1.1 equiv) and CALB (80 mg/mmol). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5‐trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard. [b] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase.

Tandem hydrogenation‐DYKAT of 1,3‐diketone 3 a. The reaction was conducted under argon atmosphere in anhydrous toluene (1 mL) at 80 °C using 3 a (0.2 mmol), Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv), Ru‐cat Ia (5 mol%), p‐ClPhOAc (1.5 equiv), alcohol 4 (1.1 equiv) and CALB (80 mg/mmol). [a] Yield determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5‐trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard. [b] dr and ee determined by GC on chiral stationary phase. In conclusion, we have reported the first protocol for chemoenzymatic DYKAT of α‐substituted β‐HKs. The newly developed method afforded highly useful β‐oxoacetates as products in good yields with high enantioselectivity and moderate diastereoselectivity. The diastereoselectivity of the overall process is proposed to be dependent on the rate difference of the enzymatic acylation of syn‐ and anti‐diastereomers of the β‐HK which is largely influenced by the steric demand of the substituent in the α‐position. While lipase CALB performed well and afforded moderate to good dr of the target β‐oxoacetates, the use of lipase PS‐IM led to considerable decrease of the diastereoselectivity of the reaction. We expect, that future improvements in terms of diastereoselectivity can be achieved by the discovery of even more selective lipase enzymes in the near future. A complimentary approach would be to use genetic tools like directed evolution where the enzyme performance could be specifically tailored to the described DYKAT protocol.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic kinetic resolution.

Authors:  M T Gihani; J M Williams
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Total synthesis of epothilone A.

Authors:  B Zhu; J S Panek
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2000-08-24       Impact factor: 6.005

3.  Discovery, applications, and catalytic mechanisms of Shvo's catalyst.

Authors:  Brian L Conley; Megan K Pennington-Boggio; Emine Boz; Travis J Williams
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Pd asymmetric allylic alkylation (AAA). A powerful synthetic tool.

Authors:  Barry M Trost
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Stereodivergent Synthesis of Chiral Paraconic Acids via Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of 3-Acylsuccinimides.

Authors:  Abhijeet M Sarkale; Vidyasagar Maurya; Sachin Giri; Chandrakumar Appayee
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Remote Stereoinductive Intramolecular Nitrile Oxide Cycloaddition: Asymmetric Total Synthesis and Structure Revision of (-)-11β-Hydroxycurvularin.

Authors:  Hyeonjeong Choe; Thuy Trang Pham; Joo Yun Lee; Muhammad Latif; Haeil Park; Young Kee Kang; Jongkook Lee
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Concerted catalytic reactions for conversion of ketones or enol acetates to chiral acetates

Authors: 
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 6.005

8.  Studies on the mechanism of metal-catalyzed hydrogen transfer from alcohols to ketones.

Authors:  O Pàmies; J E Bäckvall
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  N-Aroyl-L-phenylalanine derivatives as VCAM/VLA-4 antagonists.

Authors:  Achyutharao Sidduri; Jefferson W Tilley; Jian Ping Lou; Li Chen; Gerry Kaplan; Frank Mennona; Robert Campbell; Robert Guthrie; Tai-Nan Huang; Karen Rowan; Virginia Schwinge; Louis M Renzetti
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2002-09-02       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Racemization of secondary alcohols catalyzed by cyclopentadienylruthenium complexes: evidence for an alkoxide pathway by fast beta-hydride elimination-readdition.

Authors:  Belén Martín-Matute; Jenny B Aberg; Michaela Edin; Jan-E Bäckvall
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.236

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chemoenzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Asymmetric Transformations of β-Hydroxyketones.

Authors:  Simon Hilker; Daniels Posevins; C Rikard Unelius; Jan-E Bäckvall
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.020

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.