Literature DB >> 34415052

Bayesian adaptive trial design for a continuous biomarker with possibly nonlinear or nonmonotone prognostic or predictive effects.

Yusha Liu1, John A Kairalla2, Lindsay A Renfro3.   

Abstract

As diseases like cancer are increasingly understood on a molecular level, clinical trials are being designed to reveal or validate subpopulations in which an experimental therapy has enhanced benefit. Such biomarker-driven designs, particularly "adaptive enrichment" designs that initially enroll an unselected population and then allow for later restriction of accrual to "marker-positive" patients based on interim results, are increasingly popular. Many biomarkers of interest are naturally continuous, however, and most existing design approaches either require upfront dichotomization or force monotonicity through algorithmic searches for a single marker threshold, thereby excluding the possibility that the continuous biomarker has a nondisjoint and truly nonlinear or nonmonotone prognostic relationship with outcome or predictive relationship with treatment effect. To address this, we propose a novel trial design that leverages both the actual shapes of any continuous marker effects (both prognostic and predictive) and their corresponding posterior uncertainty in an adaptive decision-making framework. At interim analyses, this marker knowledge is updated and overall or marker-driven decisions are reached such as continuing enrollment to the next interim analysis or terminating early for efficacy or futility. Using simulations and patient-level data from a multi-center Children's Oncology Group trial in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, we derive the operating characteristics of our design and compare its performance to a traditional approach that identifies and applies a dichotomizing marker threshold.
© 2021 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian adaptive design; adaptive enrichment; biomarker-driven design; continuous biomarkers; precision medicine

Year:  2021        PMID: 34415052      PMCID: PMC8858338          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.

Authors:  Martin Jenkins; Andrew Stone; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  A two-stage patient enrichment adaptive design in phase II oncology trials.

Authors:  James X Song
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Adaptive randomized phase II design for biomarker threshold selection and independent evaluation.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Christina M Coughlin; Axel M Grothey; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03

4.  Biomarker driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints.

Authors:  Cyrus Mehta; Helmut Schäfer; Hanna Daniel; Sebastian Irle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bayesian adaptive patient enrollment restriction to identify a sensitive subpopulation using a continuous biomarker in a randomized phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Shoichi Ohwada; Satoshi Morita
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 6.  Precision oncology: A new era of cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Ming-Wen An; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  A two-stage Bayesian design for co-development of new drugs and companion diagnostics.

Authors:  Stella Wanjugu Karuri; Richard Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Werner Brannath; Emmanuel Zuber; Michael Branson; Frank Bretz; Paul Gallo; Martin Posch; Amy Racine-Poon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; Robert T O'Neill; H M James Hung
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials.

Authors:  T Friede; N Parsons; N Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.