Literature DB >> 24342820

A two-stage patient enrichment adaptive design in phase II oncology trials.

James X Song1.   

Abstract

Illustrated is the use of a patient enrichment adaptive design in a randomized phase II trial which allows the evaluation of treatment benefits by the biomarker expression level and makes interim adjustment according to the pre-specified rules. The design was applied to an actual phase II metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) trial in which progression-free survival (PFS) in two biomarker-defined populations is evaluated at both interim and final analyses. As an extension, a short-term biomarker is used to predict the long-term PFS in a Bayesian model in order to improve the precision of hazard ratio (HR) estimate at the interim analysis. The characteristics of the extended design are examined in a number of scenarios via simulations. The recommended adaptive design is shown to be useful in a phase II setting. When a short-term maker which correlates with the long-term PFS is available, the design can be applied in smaller early phase trials in which PFS requires longer follow-up. In summary, the adaptive design offers flexibility in randomized phase II patient enrichment trials and should be considered in an overall personalized healthcare (PHC) strategy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive design; Oncology; Phase II trials; Predictive marker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24342820     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  5 in total

1.  Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Inference for multimarker adaptive enrichment trials.

Authors:  Richard Simon; Noah Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Bayesian adaptive trial design for a continuous biomarker with possibly nonlinear or nonmonotone prognostic or predictive effects.

Authors:  Yusha Liu; John A Kairalla; Lindsay A Renfro
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Clinical trial designs incorporating predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Himel Mallick; Ming-Wen An; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 5.  Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Ondra; Alex Dmitrienko; Tim Friede; Alexandra Graf; Frank Miller; Nigel Stallard; Martin Posch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.