Literature DB >> 25130879

Biomarker driven population enrichment for adaptive oncology trials with time to event endpoints.

Cyrus Mehta1, Helmut Schäfer, Hanna Daniel, Sebastian Irle.   

Abstract

The development of molecularly targeted therapies for certain types of cancers has led to the consideration of population enrichment designs that explicitly factor in the possibility that the experimental compound might differentially benefit different biomarker subgroups. In such designs, enrollment would initially be open to a broad patient population with the option to restrict future enrollment, following an interim analysis, to only those biomarker subgroups that appeared to be benefiting from the experimental therapy. While this strategy could greatly improve the chances of success for the trial, it poses several statistical and logistical design challenges. Because late-stage oncology trials are typically event driven, one faces a complex trade-off between power, sample size, number of events, and study duration. This trade-off is further compounded by the importance of maintaining statistical independence of the data before and after the interim analysis and of optimizing the timing of the interim analysis. This paper presents statistical methodology that ensures strong control of type 1 error for such population enrichment designs, based on generalizations of the conditional error rate approach. The special difficulties encountered with time-to-event endpoints are addressed by our methods. The crucial role of simulation for guiding the choice of design parameters is emphasized. Although motivated by oncology, the methods are applicable as well to population enrichment designs in other therapeutic areas.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive design; clinical trial; conditional error function; multiple comparisons; precision medicine; predictive biomarker; subgroup selection; survival endpoints; targeted therapies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130879     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Use of big data in drug development for precision medicine.

Authors:  Rosa S Kim; Nicolas Goossens; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  NICE, social values, and balancing objectivity and equity.

Authors:  Suzanne R Hill; Leslie G Olson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Optimal decision rules for biomarker-based subgroup selection for a targeted therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Johannes Krisam; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Frank Bretz; Vladimir Dragalin; Franz König; Gernot Wassmer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bayesian adaptive trial design for a continuous biomarker with possibly nonlinear or nonmonotone prognostic or predictive effects.

Authors:  Yusha Liu; John A Kairalla; Lindsay A Renfro
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Clinical trial designs incorporating predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Himel Mallick; Ming-Wen An; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Bayesian group sequential enrichment designs based on adaptive regression of response and survival time on baseline biomarkers.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.701

8.  Sample Size Reassessment and Hypothesis Testing in Adaptive Survival Trials.

Authors:  Dominic Magirr; Thomas Jaki; Franz Koenig; Martin Posch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  An Overview of Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs.

Authors:  Pedro A Torres-Saavedra; Kathryn A Winter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Mortality Benefit of Recombinant Human Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist for Sepsis Varies by Initial Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Plasma Concentration.

Authors:  Nuala J Meyer; John P Reilly; Brian J Anderson; Jessica A Palakshappa; Tiffanie K Jones; Thomas G Dunn; Michael G S Shashaty; Rui Feng; Jason D Christie; Steven M Opal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.