Literature DB >> 34408380

Correlation of Variables for WHARFE Assessment and Pederson Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery-A Prospective Clinical Study.

M Ravi Sekhar1, Swapnil Singh1, Rathna Valluri1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation of factors of WHARFE assessment and Pederson difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: A comparative study of difficult factors utilizing Pederson WHARFE and WAR lines was performed involving patients undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molars for 100 such teeth.
RESULTS: The Spearman's rho correlation run to determine the relationship between Pederson difficulty index and WHARFE assessment values showed a strong, positive monotonic correlation at the 0.05 level (2-tailed; rs = 0.242, n = 100, p = 0.015 < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The study has revealed WHARFE assessment to be a more reliable and consistent measure for the radiological evaluation of surgical difficulty over the contemporary Pederson difficulty index. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficulty predictions; Lower third molar; Pederson index; WAR lines; WHARFE’S assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 34408380      PMCID: PMC8313603          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-020-01362-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  19 in total

1.  Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  A G García; F G Sampedro; J G Rey; P G Vila; M S Martin
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars.

Authors:  H Yuasa; T Kawai; M Sugiura
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Importance of Clinical and Radiological Parameters in Assessment of Surgical Difficulty in Removal of Impacted Mandibular 3rd Molars: A New Index.

Authors:  Indraniil Roy; Shridhar D Baliga; Archana Louis; Sanjay Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-12-24

4.  Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars.

Authors:  Márcio Diniz-Freitas; Lucía Lago-Méndez; Francisco Gude-Sampedro; José Manuel Somoza-Martin; José Manuel Gándara-Rey; Abel García-García
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 5.  Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review.

Authors:  Oladimeji A Akadiri; Ambrose E Obiechina
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 6.  Is Pederson Index a True Predictive Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Bali; Deepika Bali; Ashutosh Sharma; Gaurav Verma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-22

7.  The radiological assessment of ectopic lower third molars.

Authors:  A J MacGregor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Pernambuco index: predictability of the complexity of surgery for impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  R W F de Carvalho; B C Vasconcelos
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications.

Authors:  Ingibjörg S Benediktsdóttir; Ann Wenzel; Jens K Petersen; Hanne Hintze
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2004-04

10.  Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  Olalekan Micah Gbotolorun; Godwin Toyin Arotiba; Akinola Ladipo Ladeinde
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.