Literature DB >> 16434132

Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars.

Márcio Diniz-Freitas1, Lucía Lago-Méndez, Francisco Gude-Sampedro, José Manuel Somoza-Martin, José Manuel Gándara-Rey, Abel García-García.   

Abstract

We report a consecutive series of 105 extractions of impacted lower third molars, in each of which operative difficulty was predicted preoperatively using the Pederson scale (radiographic appearance of the anatomical position of the lower third molar), and postoperative difficulty was scored with a modified version of the Parant scale (operative manoeuvres that were needed for extraction of the third molar). Preoperative classification as "difficult" on the Pederson scale was not an accurate predictor of true difficulty (postoperative classification as "difficult" on the modified Parant scale). There was no significant association between the Pederson score and duration of operation, but high Parant scores were significantly associated with longer operations. We suggest that scales for the prediction of operative difficulty in the extraction of impacted lower third molars should take into account factors other than the anatomical position of the tooth.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434132     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  18 in total

1.  Effect of age, sex and level of surgical difficulty on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Otasowie D Osunde; Birch D Saheeb
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-10-01

Review 2.  Is Pederson Index a True Predictive Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Bali; Deepika Bali; Ashutosh Sharma; Gaurav Verma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-22

3.  Evaluation capability of surgical difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a retrospective study from a post-graduate institution.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

4.  [Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method].

Authors:  Z Chen; B X Gu; Y F Tang; Z Y Yan; F D Ni; N H Cui
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Correlation of Variables for WHARFE Assessment and Pederson Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery-A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  M Ravi Sekhar; Swapnil Singh; Rathna Valluri
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-25

6.  Evaluation of Third Molar Impaction Distribution and Patterns in a Sample of Lebanese Population.

Authors:  Christian Khouri; Georges Aoun; Carlos Khouri; Maria Saade; Ziad Salameh; Antoine Berberi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-16

7.  Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars.

Authors:  C-J Lima; L-C-F Silva; M-R-S Melo; J-A-S-S Santos; T-S Santos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 8.  Review of Difficulty Indices for Removal of Impacted Third Molars and a New Classification of Difficulty Indices.

Authors:  Sonal Priya Bhansali; Sumit Bhansali; Archit Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

9.  The Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Assessment of Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Study of Radiographs in East Baltic Population.

Authors:  Aleksandra Jaroń; Grzegorz Trybek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The influence of flap design on patients' experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping systematic review.

Authors:  Gennaro DE Marco; Alessandro Lanza; Corina M Cristache; Estefani B Capcha; Karen I Espinoza; Rosario Rullo; Rolando Vernal; Emilio A Cafferata; Fabrizio DI Francesco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.