Literature DB >> 26225071

Importance of Clinical and Radiological Parameters in Assessment of Surgical Difficulty in Removal of Impacted Mandibular 3rd Molars: A New Index.

Indraniil Roy1, Shridhar D Baliga2, Archana Louis2, Sanjay Rao2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess the clinical and radiological factors that increase the surgical difficulty in removal of mandibular impacted 3rd molar and design a new difficulty predictive index.
METHODS: The data was collected from 100 patients with impacted mandibular 3rd molar who presented to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, K.L.E's Institute of Dental Sciences. Clinical and radiological parameters included in the New Index were noted. The tooth was then removed under local anesthesia and time taken for the removal was noted. The Pederson Index, New Index and time taken were co-related using kappa statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The kappa agreement between Pederson Index and time taken was 66.50 % (0.2231) whereas between New Index and time was 89 % (0.7177) indicating that New Index is a better predictor of the difficulty.
CONCLUSION: The New Index is a reliable tool in predicting the difficulty in the removal of mandibular impacted third molar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3rd molar; Impaction; Minor oral surgery

Year:  2014        PMID: 26225071      PMCID: PMC4511907          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0731-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  17 in total

1.  Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  T Renton; N Smeeton; M McGurk
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-06-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction.

Authors:  O A Akadiri; A O Fasola; J T Arotiba
Journal:  Niger Postgrad Med J       Date:  2009-06

3.  Choice of anaesthetic and healthcare facility for third molar surgery.

Authors:  D J Edwards; M R Brickley; J Horton; M J Edwards; J P Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  The radiological assessment of ectopic lower third molars.

Authors:  A J MacGregor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  The removal of impacted third molars. Principles and procedures.

Authors:  K R Koerner
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1994-04

6.  Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery.

Authors:  T Renton; M McGurk
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Factors predisposing to postoperative complications related to wisdom tooth surgery among university students.

Authors:  A Muhonen; I Ventä; P Ylipaavalniemi
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1997-07

8.  Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Yoichi Nakagawa; Hisako Ishii; Yoshiaki Nomura; Nobuyuki Y Watanabe; Daigo Hoshiba; Kaoru Kobayashi; Katsunori Ishibashi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  Olalekan Micah Gbotolorun; Godwin Toyin Arotiba; Akinola Ladipo Ladeinde
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions.

Authors:  Lucía Lago-Méndez; Márcio Diniz-Freitas; Carmen Senra-Rivera; Francisco Gude-Sampedro; José Manuel Gándara Rey; Abel García-García
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  6 in total

1.  Correlation of Variables for WHARFE Assessment and Pederson Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery-A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  M Ravi Sekhar; Swapnil Singh; Rathna Valluri
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-25

Review 2.  Review of Difficulty Indices for Removal of Impacted Third Molars and a New Classification of Difficulty Indices.

Authors:  Sonal Priya Bhansali; Sumit Bhansali; Archit Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

3.  Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?

Authors:  Kyeong-Lok Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Predictive factors of difficulty in lower third molar extraction: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Alvira-González; R Figueiredo; E Valmaseda-Castellón; C Quesada-Gómez; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Application of a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Index for Evaluating Surgical Sites Prior to Sinus Lift Procedures-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shishir Ram Shetty; Satyavrat Arya; Vinayak Kamath; Saad Al-Bayatti; Hesham Marei; Hossam Abdelmagyd; Mohamed El-Kishawi; Saaid Al Shehadat; Sausan Al Kawas; Raghavendra Shetty
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Third molar surgical difficulty scales: systematic review and preoperative assessment form.

Authors:  C Gay-Escoda; A Sánchez-Torres; J Borrás-Ferreres; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2022-01-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.