Literature DB >> 34408364

Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study.

Mario Beretta1, Carlo Maiorana1, Mattia Manfredini1, Fabrizio Signorino1, Pier Paolo Poli1, Raffaele Vinci2.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study evaluated the clinical and radiological stability of hard and soft tissues following alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedure with a follow-up of 5 year from implant insertion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The initial sample consisted of seven patients who underwent single tooth extraction and ASP procedure by means of demineralized bovine bone mineral particles covered with a porcine-derived non-cross-linked collagen matrix (CM). Each patient received a submerged single implant in the healed site. Mesial and distal peri-implant marginal bone resorption (MBR) rates were assessed radiographically at 1 year (T 1) and 5 years (T 2) after implant placement (baseline value). RESULTS AND STATISTICS: No dropouts occurred up to 5 years. At T 1, the MBR was 0.08 ± 0.16 mm at the mesial aspect and 0.1 ± 0.12 mm at the distal aspect. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.867). At T 2, the mesial MBR was 0.15 ± 0.17 mm and the distal MBR was 0.11 ± 0.14 mm, with a non-statistically significant difference (P = 0.532). Therefore, no statistically significant differences were detected comparing mesial and distal MBR at any time point. With respect to the intra-group comparisons, no differences were observed comparing the different study periods within each variable. Indeed, the comparison between T 0, T 1 and T 2 was non-statistically significant at both mesial (P = 0.06) and distal (P = 0.06) aspects. After 5 years, the volume of the soft tissues appeared clinically well maintained with a natural aspect around dental implants and adjacent teeth.
CONCLUSION: ASP using demineralized bovine bone mineral in combination with CM proved to be an effective technique to maintain stable dimensional volumes of both hard and soft tissues. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; Mucograft-seal; Socket preservation; Tooth loss

Year:  2020        PMID: 34408364      PMCID: PMC8313622          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-020-01367-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  30 in total

1.  Impact of a collagen matrix on early healing, aesthetics and patient morbidity in oral mucosal wounds - a randomized study in humans.

Authors:  Daniel S Thoma; Manuel Sancho-Puchades; Dominik A Ettlin; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Local tolerance and efficiency of two prototype collagen matrices to increase the width of keratinized tissue.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Markus B Hürzeler; Daniel S Thoma; Ameen Khraisat; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Cardaropoli; Lorenzo Tamagnone; Alessandro Roffredo; Lorena Gaveglio; Giuseppe Cardaropoli
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between the buccal bone plate thickness and the healing of postextraction sockets with/without ridge preservation.

Authors:  Daniele Cardaropoli; Lorenzo Tamagnone; Alessandro Roffredo; Lorena Gaveglio
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans.

Authors:  Wah Lay Tan; Terry L T Wong; May C M Wong; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue.

Authors:  M Hallman; S Lundgren; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Porcine-derived xenograft combined with a soft cortical membrane versus extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical study in humans.

Authors:  Vincenzo Maria Festa; Francesco Addabbo; Luigi Laino; Felice Femiano; Rosario Rullo
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.932

8.  Postextraction socket preservation using epithelial connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix. 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Silvio Mario Meloni; Marco Tallarico; Francesco Maria Lolli; Alessandro Deledda; Milena Pisano; Sascha A Jovanovic
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.123

9.  Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed after a ridge preservation procedure.

Authors:  Peter Apostolopoulos; Ivan Darby
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix.

Authors:  Carlo Maiorana; Pier Paolo Poli; Matteo Deflorian; Tiziano Testori; Federico Mandelli; Heiner Nagursky; Raffaele Vinci
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.