Literature DB >> 24600657

Relationship between the buccal bone plate thickness and the healing of postextraction sockets with/without ridge preservation.

Daniele Cardaropoli, Lorenzo Tamagnone, Alessandro Roffredo, Lorena Gaveglio.   

Abstract

In 48 postextraction sites, sockets were grafted with bovine bone mineral plus collagen membrane (test) or had spontaneous healing (control). After 4 months, horizontal ridge width reduction was 0.71 mm in the test group and 4.04 mm in the control group, while vertical ridge loss was 0.58 mm and 1.67 mm, respectively. No correlation was found between the thickness of the buccal bone wall and the alveolar bone loss in the test group, while an inverse correlation was found in the control group. Ridge preservation compensated for postextraction alveolar ridge resorption irrespective of the buccal plate thickness, whereas leaving the extraction socket undisturbed may result in alveolar bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24600657     DOI: 10.11607/prd.1885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  [Recent research advances on alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction].

Authors:  Si-Jie Xiang; Jian Pan
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel H M Alsabeeha; Alan G T Payne; Warwick Duncan; Clovis M Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-28

3.  Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mario Beretta; Carlo Maiorana; Mattia Manfredini; Fabrizio Signorino; Pier Paolo Poli; Raffaele Vinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-04-18

Review 4.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 5.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

7.  Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix.

Authors:  Carlo Maiorana; Pier Paolo Poli; Matteo Deflorian; Tiziano Testori; Federico Mandelli; Heiner Nagursky; Raffaele Vinci
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 8.  Ridge Preservation Procedures after Tooth Extractions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gabriella Balli; Andreas Ioannou; Charles A Powell; Nikola Angelov; Georgios E Romanos; Nikolaos Soldatos
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-07-03

Review 9.  The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jad Majzoub; Andrea Ravida; Thomas Starch-Jensen; Mustafa Tattan; Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-09-05

10.  Functionalized Scaffold and Barrier Membrane with Anti-BMP-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in a Canine Model.

Authors:  Seiko Min; Taewan Kim; Oksu Kim; Carames Goncalo; Tadahiko Utsunomiya; Takashi Matsumoto; Kayo Kuyama; Nikola Angelov
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.